Skip to main content

That was timed perfectly - Biden's "Chains" gaffe

Earlier today, I wrote a blog where I stated that if President Barack Obama made Hillary Clinton his Vice Presidential candidate, he'd be all but guaranteed a victory in November. I also said that I doubted he would make the switch, unless Joe Biden made a horrendous gaffe or got involved in a scandal. What did I read just a few moments ago? A Biden gaffe and the very surprising responses by 2008 Republican Presidential and Vice Presidential nominees John McCain and Sarah Palin, whom said it'd probably be wise that Obama make the before-mentioned Clinton his VP candidate. 

What was it Biden said? Speaking to a crowd of African-Americans in Danville, Virginia, the Vice President said, "Unchain Wall Street. They're going to put y'all back in chains."

This was met with immediate criticism by the Romney team and Republicans in general, McCain and Palin going so far as to say it'd be wise for President Obama to name Hillary Clinton as his new Vice Presidential candidate.

Do I think Biden could have chosen his words better? Yes. However, do I think the GOP is overreacting? Yes again. 

Let's not forget, the front-runner in the GOP Primary for a time was Rick Santorum and during his campaign, he said, "They will put you in chains called 'Obamacare,' and you will never break away."

Mitt Romney's just-announced running mate, Paul Ryan, said that "a renewed commitment to limited government will unshackle our economy."

While I do believe that Joe Biden, as he often times does, didn't choose his words as carefully as he probably should have, I find it rather humorous that Republicans and Mitt Romney, in particular, would act so offended by this. Not long ago, his newly-announced running mate, Paul Ryan, made comments about "unshackling our economy". While I do feel that Obama would all be guaranteed a victory come election day if he made Hillary Clinton his VP candidate, I don't believe Biden's "chains" remark warrants the switch. 

The really sad (funny) part to me is I believe the only reason the Romney team and Republicans in general are clamoring over the Biden quote is to divert attention away from Romney's tax releases (or lack there of) and Paul Ryan's budget plan. I mean, seriously, which demographic are they trying to win over with this? Blacks? Good luck. Al Gore won 90% of the black vote in 2000. John Kerry won 88% of that vote in 2004. Barack Obama won 95% of it in 2008. So yeah, best of luck with that, Mitt and Paul. The geniuses that they are (no doubt), the Romney team must have forgotten that Paul Ryan uttered the word "unshackle" not long ago, so their attempting to focus the attention on Biden's "chains" remark will only prompt Democrats to utter the Ryan quote. Geniuses indeed!

Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Boycotting jukeboxes because of TouchTunes

I love music and enjoy hitting the bar(s) over the weekend, so naturally, when the mood strikes me, I've never been coy about playing some songs on the jukebox. This past Thursday, a friend of mine turned 50, so several friends of her's, including myself, all met up to celebrate the occasion. At around 9:30, a friend of mine and I both chipped in $5 to play some songs on the jukebox. Four hours and 231 skips later, we gave up on hearing the songs we had selected, and went home knowing we had just wasted $5. This wasn't the first time such a thing had happened to me (and many others), and due to that, I'll be boycotting jukeboxes. Why? The scam known as TouchTunes. You see, here's how the plot typically breaks down. A person (or group of people) downloads the TouchTunes app on his/her phone, consumes one too many adult beverages, and due to this, has less care for spending extra money to hear the songs of their choosing right NOW. That's the thing with TouchTun
2 comments
Read more

The difference between "looking" and "checking out"

I may be way off with these numbers, but it's my approximation that at least 75% of individuals whom are involved in a serious relationship feel it's perfectly acceptable to "check out" members of the opposite sex they're not involved with. Meanwhile, approximately 25% either don't feel this is acceptable or aren't sure about the matter. I hadn't thought about this matter for a while, but since I've been dating a woman for about 8 months, the topic has been pondered about some. When reading or hearing others discuss this very issue, I often times hear comments similar to the following: "It's human nature to look." "There's nothing wrong with checking others out. I'm sure he/she does it too!" "It's fine to do it. Just don't tell your boyfriend/girlfriend about it or do it in front of them!" "It's natural to find people attractive." When observing the array of comments, I i
Post a Comment
Read more

The verdict is in. To no one's surprise, Jonathan Hoenig has been found guilty of being an idiot.

Just recently, when discussing the Michael Brown shooting and whether or not race had anything to do with it, Fox News contributor Jonathan Hoenig said, "You know who talks about race? Racists." One moment while I provide Mr. Hoenig with the well deserved slow-clap. :: slow-claps for two seconds :: So, that was quite the line by Mr. Hoenig, wasn't it? "You know who talks about race? Racists." Well, wasn't he just talking about race? So, by his own words, I guess that makes him a racist. Also, if he wants to be consistent, does this mean that people whom talk about gender are sexists and people whom talk about sexual orientation are homophobes? With that line of thinking, Hoenig would engage in the following back-and-forths: Hoenig: "So, who are you voting for?" A woman: "The Democratic candidate, because he's been adamant about his support for equal rights for women." Hoenig: "You sexist feminist nazi!"
Post a Comment
Read more