Skip to main content

What makes Vick both exciting and risky

For the second time in two pre-season games, Philadelphia Eagles quarterback, Michael Vick, had to leave the game early due to injury. He hit his left thumb on his center's helmet on a follow-through in the first game against Pittsburgh and got leveled by a Patriots' defender right square in the ribs in last night's game. Fortunately for Vick and the Eagles, both X-rays came out negative and he should be fine to go in the next pre-season game.

This trend can't continue for Vick and the Eagles, though. They won't get lucky every time this happens and the Eagles can ill-afford to lose Vick for an extended period of time during the course of the season. Vick needs to protect himself better when he's left vulnerable by the offensive line or he makes himself vulnerable by running outside the pocket. The thing about Vick that makes him such an exciting player yet one that is also prone to getting hurt is the fact he doesn't give up on plays. Due to the unprecedented levels of speed and elusiveness that he possesses at the quarterback position, the guy has often times made a living out of spinning away from oncoming defenders and either scrambling for a large gain with his feet or heaving the ball deep on a pass which could only be scripted in a backyard football game. While it may be easier said than done, Vick is going to need to learn how to pick his spots better - when he needs to just throw the ball away or take a sack due to the risk outweighing the reward and when the opposite is true and he should try to once again make something out of nothing.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Boycotting jukeboxes because of TouchTunes

I love music and enjoy hitting the bar(s) over the weekend, so naturally, when the mood strikes me, I've never been coy about playing some songs on the jukebox. This past Thursday, a friend of mine turned 50, so several friends of her's, including myself, all met up to celebrate the occasion. At around 9:30, a friend of mine and I both chipped in $5 to play some songs on the jukebox. Four hours and 231 skips later, we gave up on hearing the songs we had selected, and went home knowing we had just wasted $5. This wasn't the first time such a thing had happened to me (and many others), and due to that, I'll be boycotting jukeboxes. Why? The scam known as TouchTunes. You see, here's how the plot typically breaks down. A person (or group of people) downloads the TouchTunes app on his/her phone, consumes one too many adult beverages, and due to this, has less care for spending extra money to hear the songs of their choosing right NOW. That's the thing with TouchTun

The difference between "looking" and "checking out"

I may be way off with these numbers, but it's my approximation that at least 75% of individuals whom are involved in a serious relationship feel it's perfectly acceptable to "check out" members of the opposite sex they're not involved with. Meanwhile, approximately 25% either don't feel this is acceptable or aren't sure about the matter. I hadn't thought about this matter for a while, but since I've been dating a woman for about 8 months, the topic has been pondered about some. When reading or hearing others discuss this very issue, I often times hear comments similar to the following: "It's human nature to look." "There's nothing wrong with checking others out. I'm sure he/she does it too!" "It's fine to do it. Just don't tell your boyfriend/girlfriend about it or do it in front of them!" "It's natural to find people attractive." When observing the array of comments, I i

The verdict is in. To no one's surprise, Jonathan Hoenig has been found guilty of being an idiot.

Just recently, when discussing the Michael Brown shooting and whether or not race had anything to do with it, Fox News contributor Jonathan Hoenig said, "You know who talks about race? Racists." One moment while I provide Mr. Hoenig with the well deserved slow-clap. :: slow-claps for two seconds :: So, that was quite the line by Mr. Hoenig, wasn't it? "You know who talks about race? Racists." Well, wasn't he just talking about race? So, by his own words, I guess that makes him a racist. Also, if he wants to be consistent, does this mean that people whom talk about gender are sexists and people whom talk about sexual orientation are homophobes? With that line of thinking, Hoenig would engage in the following back-and-forths: Hoenig: "So, who are you voting for?" A woman: "The Democratic candidate, because he's been adamant about his support for equal rights for women." Hoenig: "You sexist feminist nazi!"