Skip to main content

Paul Ryan's Effect on the Election

Many talking heads and columnists have been speculating just how Mitt Romney's choice of running mate Paul Ryan will shake up the election. Of course, these articles were filled with more questions than answers and by the end of the "piece" (meant to be taken ambiguously), I thought to myself, "What was the point of that exactly?"

In my honest opinion, I don't see much of a shake-up at all and if anything, think that the Ryan pick could hinder Romney from an electoral college standpoint.

Let's look at the map, shall we? Keep in mind that it takes 270 electoral votes to win the election.

Here are the states Barack Obama will almost certainly win in November (the electoral votes for the state and then the cumulative total of electoral votes will be placed in parentheses):

1. Washington (12 - 12)
2. Oregon (7 - 19)
3. California (55 - 74)
4. Hawaii (4 - 78)
5. New Mexico (5 - 83)
6. Illinois (20 - 103)
7. Washington, D.C. (3 - 106)
8. Maine (4 - 110)
9. Vermont (3 - 113)
10. New York (29 - 142)
11. New Jersey (14 - 156)
12. Massachusetts (11 - 167)
13. Connecticut (7 - 174)
14. Rhode Island (4 - 178)
15. Delaware (3 - 181)
16. Maryland (10 - 191)

Now here are a list of states Obama will likely win, but they are not solid guarantees like the previous 16 (15 and D.C., I suppose):

17. Nevada (6 - 197)
18. Minnesota (10 - 207)
19. Michigan (16 - 223)
20. Wisconsin (10 - 233)
21. Pennsylvania (20 - 253)
22. New Hampshire (4 - 257)

So, given the 21 states (and D.C.) that I feel Obama will likely win, he'd need only 13 additional electoral votes to assure himself another 4 years as President of the United States.

What other states are likely in play for the president?

23. Iowa (6)
24. Colorado (9)
25. Ohio (18)
26. Virginia (13)
27. North Carolina (15)
28. Florida (29)
29. Missouri (10)

(with outside chances in the likes of: Montana (3), North Dakota (3), Indiana (11), Georgia (16), South Carolina (9) and Arizona (11))

The state I'm now looking at after the Ryan nomination? Florida. Mitt Romney had led in state polls for quite some time until recently, when Obama either caught him or went ahead. With Ryan now as his running mate, Romney may be in serious trouble in this state. Why? Ryan is none-too-popular with the Latino community due to his stance on immigration and he pretty much wants to do away with Medicare. What two demographics is the state of Florida most known for? Latino-Americans and the elderly. With Ryan on the ticket, I look for Obama to win Florida and the 29 electoral votes there, which would lift him to 286 such votes and another 4 years in office. He could then lose: Iowa, Colorado, Ohio, Virginia, North Carolina, Missouri and the 71 electoral votes in those 6 states and still come out on top at night's end. Even if Ryan helped Romney win the states of Iowa (6), Ohio (18), Wisconsin (10) and Minnesota (10), Obama would still wind up with 276 electoral votes due to Florida and win his re-election bid. Why again did Romney select Ryan as his running mate?

http://www.270towin.com/

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Boycotting jukeboxes because of TouchTunes

I love music and enjoy hitting the bar(s) over the weekend, so naturally, when the mood strikes me, I've never been coy about playing some songs on the jukebox. This past Thursday, a friend of mine turned 50, so several friends of her's, including myself, all met up to celebrate the occasion. At around 9:30, a friend of mine and I both chipped in $5 to play some songs on the jukebox. Four hours and 231 skips later, we gave up on hearing the songs we had selected, and went home knowing we had just wasted $5. This wasn't the first time such a thing had happened to me (and many others), and due to that, I'll be boycotting jukeboxes. Why? The scam known as TouchTunes. You see, here's how the plot typically breaks down. A person (or group of people) downloads the TouchTunes app on his/her phone, consumes one too many adult beverages, and due to this, has less care for spending extra money to hear the songs of their choosing right NOW. That's the thing with TouchTun

The difference between "looking" and "checking out"

I may be way off with these numbers, but it's my approximation that at least 75% of individuals whom are involved in a serious relationship feel it's perfectly acceptable to "check out" members of the opposite sex they're not involved with. Meanwhile, approximately 25% either don't feel this is acceptable or aren't sure about the matter. I hadn't thought about this matter for a while, but since I've been dating a woman for about 8 months, the topic has been pondered about some. When reading or hearing others discuss this very issue, I often times hear comments similar to the following: "It's human nature to look." "There's nothing wrong with checking others out. I'm sure he/she does it too!" "It's fine to do it. Just don't tell your boyfriend/girlfriend about it or do it in front of them!" "It's natural to find people attractive." When observing the array of comments, I i

The verdict is in. To no one's surprise, Jonathan Hoenig has been found guilty of being an idiot.

Just recently, when discussing the Michael Brown shooting and whether or not race had anything to do with it, Fox News contributor Jonathan Hoenig said, "You know who talks about race? Racists." One moment while I provide Mr. Hoenig with the well deserved slow-clap. :: slow-claps for two seconds :: So, that was quite the line by Mr. Hoenig, wasn't it? "You know who talks about race? Racists." Well, wasn't he just talking about race? So, by his own words, I guess that makes him a racist. Also, if he wants to be consistent, does this mean that people whom talk about gender are sexists and people whom talk about sexual orientation are homophobes? With that line of thinking, Hoenig would engage in the following back-and-forths: Hoenig: "So, who are you voting for?" A woman: "The Democratic candidate, because he's been adamant about his support for equal rights for women." Hoenig: "You sexist feminist nazi!"