Skip to main content

Tips or No Tips? Which system is better?

I'm curious to see a study which compares and contrasts the pros and cons of tips (as far as tipping waiters, bartenders, etc.). When many Europeans visit the States, they're often times confused by the concept of tipping. In their native countries, the "tips" are already built in to the overall salary, which makes for a more consistent annual wage. When they hear how much waiters and bartenders make per hour here, they're often times shocked and ask how they live off that. That's when the waiter or bartender explains the concept of tipping.

I guess my question is, which is the better method overall?

I think the theory in this country is that people will work harder for the extra tip - the "bonus" at the end of his/her job. If he or she doesn't excel, they deservedly won't be tipped well and if they do excel, the tip will reflect that and continue to inspire them to excel day in and day out. However, how often is that the case? Regardless of a person's performance on the job, how often does he/she not receive the tip they so rightfully deserve? Is there a set tipping percentage most people give, where they won't budge for anybody, regardless of the quality of service? Are there some people whom are notoriously poor tippers, regardless of the quality of service? Also, what would motivate a person to work harder and perform well on a regular basis - the extra tip at the end of the job or a guaranteed decent salary for the year void of any tips?

In my opinion, I think I like the concept of tips in theory, however, I don't think it plays out very well in reality and in the end, I feel that it'd be better for these workers to be guaranteed a decent salary by year's end than have to worry about whether or not customers are feeling generous on a particular day or week.

I think this is especially troublesome when it comes to bartenders, because many of their patrons are tipsy (or worse) by the time they receive their tab. How functional is their mind from any angle, let alone the mathematical one, by that point in the evening? They may have received great service throughout the night, but they may not be able to recall that, let alone be able to mentally figure a 20-30% tip. Sure, they could use a calculator on their phone, but if they're tipsy, that may not work too well either.

Unfortunately, I feel that working for tips is just as much based on luck as it is hard work. Even if a person is extremely consistent and solid at their job, there are going to be weeks where they hardly receive any tips and other weeks when they can't believe how much they received in tips. It wasn't so much due to their having a much better week on the job performance wise. It was more to do with whom they were serving.

I also think this can create a bit of bias toward customers. If there are regulars at a particular restaurant or bar, Person A is a notoriously bad tipper, Person B is very average in their tipping and Person C is an extremely good tipper, after a while, the waiter and/or bartender may provide better service to Person C than Person B and Person B than Person A.

I guess the more I think about it, the more I feel we should do away with the tipping-system in this country and guarantee a decent salary for people void of tips. Tips are never guaranteed and with as low as these people's salaries are, they can often times live paycheck to paycheck and worry themselves sick by wondering if they'll be able to make enough tips to pay rent or pay for groceries. I think that overall, people would be less stressed on the job and through that and other factors, able to consistently perform at a high level.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Boycotting jukeboxes because of TouchTunes

I love music and enjoy hitting the bar(s) over the weekend, so naturally, when the mood strikes me, I've never been coy about playing some songs on the jukebox. This past Thursday, a friend of mine turned 50, so several friends of her's, including myself, all met up to celebrate the occasion. At around 9:30, a friend of mine and I both chipped in $5 to play some songs on the jukebox. Four hours and 231 skips later, we gave up on hearing the songs we had selected, and went home knowing we had just wasted $5. This wasn't the first time such a thing had happened to me (and many others), and due to that, I'll be boycotting jukeboxes. Why? The scam known as TouchTunes. You see, here's how the plot typically breaks down. A person (or group of people) downloads the TouchTunes app on his/her phone, consumes one too many adult beverages, and due to this, has less care for spending extra money to hear the songs of their choosing right NOW. That's the thing with TouchTun

The difference between "looking" and "checking out"

I may be way off with these numbers, but it's my approximation that at least 75% of individuals whom are involved in a serious relationship feel it's perfectly acceptable to "check out" members of the opposite sex they're not involved with. Meanwhile, approximately 25% either don't feel this is acceptable or aren't sure about the matter. I hadn't thought about this matter for a while, but since I've been dating a woman for about 8 months, the topic has been pondered about some. When reading or hearing others discuss this very issue, I often times hear comments similar to the following: "It's human nature to look." "There's nothing wrong with checking others out. I'm sure he/she does it too!" "It's fine to do it. Just don't tell your boyfriend/girlfriend about it or do it in front of them!" "It's natural to find people attractive." When observing the array of comments, I i

The verdict is in. To no one's surprise, Jonathan Hoenig has been found guilty of being an idiot.

Just recently, when discussing the Michael Brown shooting and whether or not race had anything to do with it, Fox News contributor Jonathan Hoenig said, "You know who talks about race? Racists." One moment while I provide Mr. Hoenig with the well deserved slow-clap. :: slow-claps for two seconds :: So, that was quite the line by Mr. Hoenig, wasn't it? "You know who talks about race? Racists." Well, wasn't he just talking about race? So, by his own words, I guess that makes him a racist. Also, if he wants to be consistent, does this mean that people whom talk about gender are sexists and people whom talk about sexual orientation are homophobes? With that line of thinking, Hoenig would engage in the following back-and-forths: Hoenig: "So, who are you voting for?" A woman: "The Democratic candidate, because he's been adamant about his support for equal rights for women." Hoenig: "You sexist feminist nazi!"