Skip to main content

Ugh for Dan Uggla

I've been an Atlanta Braves fan for quite a number of years and while it appears as if the Braves are in pretty good shape to make the playoffs once again - this time as a Wild Card - I've remained extremely disappointed with second baseman, Dan Uggla.

Last night, in the bottom of the 13th inning against division-leading Washington, the Nationals had runners at 1st and 3rd with one out. A ground ball was hit right to Uggla, who was playing in on the infield. The runner at 3rd base ran on contact. Uggla had to either try and get a double play by going to the shortstop at second or go directly at home. Based on how he was positioned - the best odds would have been to throw to home. What did he do? He froze. He froze like an ice sculpture being visited by the president. The run scored and that was the ball game, which then placed Washington a full six games ahead of Atlanta with about 40 to go.

Sadly, his glove work hasn't been the most disappointing aspect of his game. No, the most disappointing part of his game for the two years he's been with the Braves has been his bat. To his credit, he did bounce back fairly nicely after a horrendous start last year en route to jacking 36 home runs and 82 RBI's. However, he also finished the year only hitting .233 - his lowest batting average as a major leaguer. He got off to a much better start at the plate this year and even made the all-star game, but has struggled ever since then and his numbers are even worse than last year - hitting just .210, with 15 home runs and 62 RBI's.

It's really a shame, because I like Dan Uggla. The guy always hustles, swings the bat like he wants to decapitate somebody and is fun to watch play. He's a guy that's easy to root for in the game. However, the Braves can't afford paying this guy the kind of money they are and only getting .210 - .230 average in return. The Braves (outside of Chipper Jones) have a great young line-up when healthy, with: Michael Bourne in center (one of the fastest players in the majors), Jason Heyward in right (who's having a solid comeback year after his disappointing sophomore campaign), Martin Prado in left (one of the more underrated players in the league, in my opinion), Andrelton Simmons at short (he's banged up now, but should be back before too long and appears to have a great deal of potential), Freddie Freeman at first (one of the purer swings on the team - should be a solid contributor for years to come) and Brian McCann at catcher (having an off-year, quite possibly due to nagging injuries, yet is a very solid all-around hitter most years and is contributing in the power production categories this season). If Chipper does in fact retire at the end of the season, I might try trading Uggla and a minor league prospect or two for a more reliable second baseman and a left fielder, as Prado may then be shifted from left to third in Chipper's absence. Hopefully Uggla can turn it around in the final 40 games of the season (and the playoffs), but based on what I've been seeing in recent weeks, that's not all too likely.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Boycotting jukeboxes because of TouchTunes

I love music and enjoy hitting the bar(s) over the weekend, so naturally, when the mood strikes me, I've never been coy about playing some songs on the jukebox. This past Thursday, a friend of mine turned 50, so several friends of her's, including myself, all met up to celebrate the occasion. At around 9:30, a friend of mine and I both chipped in $5 to play some songs on the jukebox. Four hours and 231 skips later, we gave up on hearing the songs we had selected, and went home knowing we had just wasted $5. This wasn't the first time such a thing had happened to me (and many others), and due to that, I'll be boycotting jukeboxes. Why? The scam known as TouchTunes. You see, here's how the plot typically breaks down. A person (or group of people) downloads the TouchTunes app on his/her phone, consumes one too many adult beverages, and due to this, has less care for spending extra money to hear the songs of their choosing right NOW. That's the thing with TouchTun

The difference between "looking" and "checking out"

I may be way off with these numbers, but it's my approximation that at least 75% of individuals whom are involved in a serious relationship feel it's perfectly acceptable to "check out" members of the opposite sex they're not involved with. Meanwhile, approximately 25% either don't feel this is acceptable or aren't sure about the matter. I hadn't thought about this matter for a while, but since I've been dating a woman for about 8 months, the topic has been pondered about some. When reading or hearing others discuss this very issue, I often times hear comments similar to the following: "It's human nature to look." "There's nothing wrong with checking others out. I'm sure he/she does it too!" "It's fine to do it. Just don't tell your boyfriend/girlfriend about it or do it in front of them!" "It's natural to find people attractive." When observing the array of comments, I i

The verdict is in. To no one's surprise, Jonathan Hoenig has been found guilty of being an idiot.

Just recently, when discussing the Michael Brown shooting and whether or not race had anything to do with it, Fox News contributor Jonathan Hoenig said, "You know who talks about race? Racists." One moment while I provide Mr. Hoenig with the well deserved slow-clap. :: slow-claps for two seconds :: So, that was quite the line by Mr. Hoenig, wasn't it? "You know who talks about race? Racists." Well, wasn't he just talking about race? So, by his own words, I guess that makes him a racist. Also, if he wants to be consistent, does this mean that people whom talk about gender are sexists and people whom talk about sexual orientation are homophobes? With that line of thinking, Hoenig would engage in the following back-and-forths: Hoenig: "So, who are you voting for?" A woman: "The Democratic candidate, because he's been adamant about his support for equal rights for women." Hoenig: "You sexist feminist nazi!"