Skip to main content

Well, this is stupid - Group attacks Obama on Bin Laden raid

I really don't understand political strategies sometimes. I didn't understand John McCain's choice of Sarah Palin as his running mate for the 2008 Presidential Election. I honestly don't really understand Mitt Romney's choice of Paul Ryan as his running mate. Now it appears as if a group of ex-special operations and C.I.A. officers have released a video criticizing the president of his Bin Laden raid.

I guess this group believes that the president allowed for certain leaks regarding the mission in order to improve his political standing with the public, placing this country in harm's way. True or not, what this group is doing is making the country relive one of Obama's high points in office - the killing of Osama bin Laden. I'm trying to be politically correct here, but I think this move by the Opsec group is "mentally handicapped". Many of the members of this group have been involved with either/both the Republican and Tea Party. If they truly want President Obama to lose the upcoming election, why in Hercules' rectum would they bring up the Osama bin Laden killing yet again? I see this only backfiring on the group and I sincerely hope the likes of Jon Stewart and Stephen Colbert highlight it in order to illustrate just how ridiculous and idiotic a move this is. Well, I must be going. I'm going to make the public hate my arch-nemesis by telling them of the time he saved a child's life. Wish me luck!

http://www.nytimes.com/2012/08/16/us/politics/ex-military-and-cia-officers-attack-obama-over-bin-laden-leaks.html?_r=1
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Boycotting jukeboxes because of TouchTunes

I love music and enjoy hitting the bar(s) over the weekend, so naturally, when the mood strikes me, I've never been coy about playing some songs on the jukebox. This past Thursday, a friend of mine turned 50, so several friends of her's, including myself, all met up to celebrate the occasion. At around 9:30, a friend of mine and I both chipped in $5 to play some songs on the jukebox. Four hours and 231 skips later, we gave up on hearing the songs we had selected, and went home knowing we had just wasted $5. This wasn't the first time such a thing had happened to me (and many others), and due to that, I'll be boycotting jukeboxes. Why? The scam known as TouchTunes. You see, here's how the plot typically breaks down. A person (or group of people) downloads the TouchTunes app on his/her phone, consumes one too many adult beverages, and due to this, has less care for spending extra money to hear the songs of their choosing right NOW. That's the thing with TouchTun...
2 comments
Read more

Mentioned on Crooks and Liars and Hinterland Gazette!

Due to some tweets of mine, I got mentioned on the following two sites (all my tweets can be viewed here -  https://twitter.com/CraigRozniecki ): https://crooksandliars.com/2019/04/trump-gives-stupid-advice-george https://hinterlandgazette.com/2019/03/istandwithschiff-is-trending-after-donald-trump-led-gop-attack-on-adam-schiff-backfires-spectacularly.html
Post a Comment
Read more

Face guarding is legal in college football and the NFL

I just wanted to remind fans and announcers especially, that face guarding is legal in both college football and the NFL. It all comes down to contact. So long as a defender doesn't make contact with an intended receiver, he doesn't have to turn around to play the ball. I can't tell you how many times every week I hear announcers talk about face guarding being a penalty. It's not. I even heard one announcer yesterday state, "If the defender doesn't turn around and play the ball, the ref will call pass interference every time." That's simply not true. Courtesy of referee Bill LeMonnier, he says this with regard to the rule at the college level (answered on 8/12/13): "NCAA rules on pass interference require the face guarding to have contact to be a foul. No contact, no foul by NCAA rules." In the NFL rule book, this is written:  "Actions that constitute defensive pass interference include but are not limited to: (a) Contact by a ...
2 comments
Read more