Skip to main content

Alicia Keys judged by Yahoo members? Seriously?

I'm not going to get into whether or not I felt Grammy Award-winning musician Alicia Keys was right or wrong in creating a jazzy rendition of "The Star Spangled Banner" during her performance at the Super Bowl Sunday night.

What I am going to get into is a ridiculous article regarding the performance. It was written by Chris Willman of Stop the Presses and released yesterday via Yahoo.

Willman started the "piece" (I use that term ambiguously) by saying, "...Just look at the backlash against Alicia Keys' version of the tune before the Super Bowl if you want a good example of bombs bursting in air."

He went on to note that most singers and music critics praised Keys' performance, with Randy Jackson saying that she "killed it." He also noted the positive comments by film director Spike Lee as well as former Survivor contestant Elisabeth Hasselbeck. Perhaps he groups them in with singers and music critics; I really don't know.

Following that, Willman went on (and on and on some more) about Yahoo members' comments and how negative they were.

One such comment was the following - "Stop trying to make the national anthem'your own'. It's not yours. It's ours collectively. Sing it the way it's supposed to be sung."

Upon Willman's posting of this article, that comment had received 1,098 thumbs-up and just 225 thumbs-down.

Another such comment was: "One of the worst anthem renditions I have ever seen or heard. What a funeral durge. Too slow."

Upon Willman's posting of the article, that comment had received 1,058 thumbs-up and 248 thumbs-down.

Really? We're going to look toward Yahoo members for guidance on the arts? ...on the answers? ...on just about any and everything? Really?

In response to Donald Trump suing Bill Maher over an orangutan joke, one Yahoo member defended Trump with the following comment - "I just told my bookie that the bet I made on the 49rs [sic] was a joke. He isn't buying it either." At this very moment, that comment has 1,819 thumbs-up and 239 thumbs-down. So, yes, let's all stand in unison and proclaim to the world that Donald Trump is absolutely right to sue a comedian for telling a joke about him on a late-night comedy show, since he thought this statement made by a comedian on a late-night comedy show at his expense was a serious statement!

I'm starting to seriously wonder what the point of critics is anymore, since it seems as if many "journalists" are, instead of asking for or providing expert opinion, looking to random people on Twitter and Yahoo to provide their expertise in hyperbole, abbreviations, and typos. Well done! Well, I must be going. I'm going to ask my dog what her thoughts were on the Alicia Keys performance. I'll be certain to post my interpretation of her response on this site as well as Facebook. Stay tuned...

http://music.yahoo.com/blogs/stop-the-presses/singing-star-spangled-banner-sure-recipe-backlash-ask-103647816.html

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Boycotting jukeboxes because of TouchTunes

I love music and enjoy hitting the bar(s) over the weekend, so naturally, when the mood strikes me, I've never been coy about playing some songs on the jukebox. This past Thursday, a friend of mine turned 50, so several friends of her's, including myself, all met up to celebrate the occasion. At around 9:30, a friend of mine and I both chipped in $5 to play some songs on the jukebox. Four hours and 231 skips later, we gave up on hearing the songs we had selected, and went home knowing we had just wasted $5. This wasn't the first time such a thing had happened to me (and many others), and due to that, I'll be boycotting jukeboxes. Why? The scam known as TouchTunes. You see, here's how the plot typically breaks down. A person (or group of people) downloads the TouchTunes app on his/her phone, consumes one too many adult beverages, and due to this, has less care for spending extra money to hear the songs of their choosing right NOW. That's the thing with TouchTun

The difference between "looking" and "checking out"

I may be way off with these numbers, but it's my approximation that at least 75% of individuals whom are involved in a serious relationship feel it's perfectly acceptable to "check out" members of the opposite sex they're not involved with. Meanwhile, approximately 25% either don't feel this is acceptable or aren't sure about the matter. I hadn't thought about this matter for a while, but since I've been dating a woman for about 8 months, the topic has been pondered about some. When reading or hearing others discuss this very issue, I often times hear comments similar to the following: "It's human nature to look." "There's nothing wrong with checking others out. I'm sure he/she does it too!" "It's fine to do it. Just don't tell your boyfriend/girlfriend about it or do it in front of them!" "It's natural to find people attractive." When observing the array of comments, I i

The verdict is in. To no one's surprise, Jonathan Hoenig has been found guilty of being an idiot.

Just recently, when discussing the Michael Brown shooting and whether or not race had anything to do with it, Fox News contributor Jonathan Hoenig said, "You know who talks about race? Racists." One moment while I provide Mr. Hoenig with the well deserved slow-clap. :: slow-claps for two seconds :: So, that was quite the line by Mr. Hoenig, wasn't it? "You know who talks about race? Racists." Well, wasn't he just talking about race? So, by his own words, I guess that makes him a racist. Also, if he wants to be consistent, does this mean that people whom talk about gender are sexists and people whom talk about sexual orientation are homophobes? With that line of thinking, Hoenig would engage in the following back-and-forths: Hoenig: "So, who are you voting for?" A woman: "The Democratic candidate, because he's been adamant about his support for equal rights for women." Hoenig: "You sexist feminist nazi!"