Skip to main content

Blind Trust vs. Blind Hatred of Presidents

I just thought about this the other day and found it to be quite interesting. Many in the media like to utilize hyperbole to exaggerate a point and draw attention to both it and themselves. Since Obama has been in office, many pundits on both sides of the aisle have been prone to proclaiming that President Obama is either too in-line with former President George W. Bush's terror policies or his policies are too drastically different from the former president's. Of course, the answer lies somewhere in the middle of the two extremes. While I think there have been some slight differences with this administration's terror policies than the previous one, it's been disappointingly too similar for many self-described liberals such as myself.

Taking all of that into consideration, though, why is it that many Republicans were in favor of the policies when George W. Bush was in office and not now, and why is it that many Democrats weren't supportive of then President Bush's policies, but are now supportive of them under President Obama? It doesn't make a whole lot of sense, from just a policy standpoint, for a person to disagree with it under one president but agree with it under another.

I think the biggest factor in this is trust. For whatever reason, Republicans tended to trust George W. Bush in the Oval Office and even if the policies are similar, they don't trust Barack Obama. On the flip-side, Democrats trust Obama with these similar policies when they didn't trust Bush.

I can understand that reasoning to an extent. If my father had a couple drinks in him and was driving, I'd instantly trust him more than I would a stranger with a similar quantity of alcohol consumption. This wouldn't be wise on my part. It'd just be a certain blind trust I have with family and friends, and perhaps that's how things are to many when it comes to party affiliation. However, if I were to stand back and think about things a bit further, I could see that whether my father or a complete stranger was driving, they shouldn't with the amount of drinking they did, and I shouldn't trust either of them under those conditions. Also, while I may like Barack Obama more as a president than George W. Bush, when I stand back a bit to garner some perspective, I can see that it ultimately doesn't make a whole lot of sense for me to disagree so strongly with President Bush's signing and enacting the U.S. Patriot Act, and to not be displeased with President Obama compromising on the bill in order to get it extended. Granted, I have been outspoken against both presidents on that very issue from the start, yet have noticed that many on both sides of the aisle tend to illustrate contradictory behavior on such matters.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Boycotting jukeboxes because of TouchTunes

I love music and enjoy hitting the bar(s) over the weekend, so naturally, when the mood strikes me, I've never been coy about playing some songs on the jukebox. This past Thursday, a friend of mine turned 50, so several friends of her's, including myself, all met up to celebrate the occasion. At around 9:30, a friend of mine and I both chipped in $5 to play some songs on the jukebox. Four hours and 231 skips later, we gave up on hearing the songs we had selected, and went home knowing we had just wasted $5. This wasn't the first time such a thing had happened to me (and many others), and due to that, I'll be boycotting jukeboxes. Why? The scam known as TouchTunes. You see, here's how the plot typically breaks down. A person (or group of people) downloads the TouchTunes app on his/her phone, consumes one too many adult beverages, and due to this, has less care for spending extra money to hear the songs of their choosing right NOW. That's the thing with TouchTun

The difference between "looking" and "checking out"

I may be way off with these numbers, but it's my approximation that at least 75% of individuals whom are involved in a serious relationship feel it's perfectly acceptable to "check out" members of the opposite sex they're not involved with. Meanwhile, approximately 25% either don't feel this is acceptable or aren't sure about the matter. I hadn't thought about this matter for a while, but since I've been dating a woman for about 8 months, the topic has been pondered about some. When reading or hearing others discuss this very issue, I often times hear comments similar to the following: "It's human nature to look." "There's nothing wrong with checking others out. I'm sure he/she does it too!" "It's fine to do it. Just don't tell your boyfriend/girlfriend about it or do it in front of them!" "It's natural to find people attractive." When observing the array of comments, I i

The verdict is in. To no one's surprise, Jonathan Hoenig has been found guilty of being an idiot.

Just recently, when discussing the Michael Brown shooting and whether or not race had anything to do with it, Fox News contributor Jonathan Hoenig said, "You know who talks about race? Racists." One moment while I provide Mr. Hoenig with the well deserved slow-clap. :: slow-claps for two seconds :: So, that was quite the line by Mr. Hoenig, wasn't it? "You know who talks about race? Racists." Well, wasn't he just talking about race? So, by his own words, I guess that makes him a racist. Also, if he wants to be consistent, does this mean that people whom talk about gender are sexists and people whom talk about sexual orientation are homophobes? With that line of thinking, Hoenig would engage in the following back-and-forths: Hoenig: "So, who are you voting for?" A woman: "The Democratic candidate, because he's been adamant about his support for equal rights for women." Hoenig: "You sexist feminist nazi!"