Skip to main content

Marco Rubio's response to the State of the Union Address

I didn't know whether to shake my head in disgust or cringe and feel sorry for Marco Rubio last night when giving the State of the Union rebuttal. Granted, it is quite the difficult and awkward task for a person to follow the president's State of the Union speech. Since there's less time to give the speech, details tend to be substituted with generalities, slogans, and talking points. There isn't a great deal of time to go through one's notes regarding the speech, so this too can limit the number of specific details one can present in the rebuttal. Less people tune into the rebuttal than the actual State of the Union speech, and the overall presentation works against the person giving the rebuttal as well. Whereas the president hears commentary emanating from members of Congress' mouths during the speech, along with loud roars, and standing ovations at times, the individual giving the rebuttal typically appears to be in a room all by himself/herself, along with the camera-person.

So, yes, part of me feels for a person like Marco Rubio, who was placed in that difficult position last night. The pressure was placed on him to produce, to become the new face for the party, much like Bobby Jindal was not too long ago, and like Jindal, Rubio fell flat on his face (figuratively speaking, of course). What's the one moment of Rubio's speech that people are talking about? When the guy appeared to be so uncomfortable and nervous, he reached out for a bottle of water, took a drink, handed it back, and went right back to talking. There are already several YouTube clips of this very moment, where people are poking fun at the guy. I have to imagine the likes of Jon Stewart and Stephen Colbert will poke fun of him as well on tonight's programs. When the one moment people remember about a speech is an awkward one where a guy reaches a ways for a bottle of water, it's pretty safe to say it's not going to be remembered as being a good speech.

If we were to just look at the actual content in the speech, it sounded like almost every other I've heard from leaders of the Republican Party in recent years. The guy sounded off on the president and the Democratic Party being about taxing and spending (where have I heard that before...) - that they were about big government, and that more government is never a good thing. Meanwhile, he talked about how he received student loans from the government to complete his education and get him to where he is today, before once again basically calling the government worthless. I know, it doesn't make sense, and even he seemed to have trouble buying what he was saying (being told to say).

If I had to grade Rubio's speech, I'd give it a "C-," as it sounded like almost every other like-speech I've heard from Republican leaders in recent years, yet with an above-average awkwardness about it. Like I said, I kind of felt sorry for the guy, yet can't find it in me to raise his grade any just based on that.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Boycotting jukeboxes because of TouchTunes

I love music and enjoy hitting the bar(s) over the weekend, so naturally, when the mood strikes me, I've never been coy about playing some songs on the jukebox. This past Thursday, a friend of mine turned 50, so several friends of her's, including myself, all met up to celebrate the occasion. At around 9:30, a friend of mine and I both chipped in $5 to play some songs on the jukebox. Four hours and 231 skips later, we gave up on hearing the songs we had selected, and went home knowing we had just wasted $5. This wasn't the first time such a thing had happened to me (and many others), and due to that, I'll be boycotting jukeboxes. Why? The scam known as TouchTunes. You see, here's how the plot typically breaks down. A person (or group of people) downloads the TouchTunes app on his/her phone, consumes one too many adult beverages, and due to this, has less care for spending extra money to hear the songs of their choosing right NOW. That's the thing with TouchTun

The difference between "looking" and "checking out"

I may be way off with these numbers, but it's my approximation that at least 75% of individuals whom are involved in a serious relationship feel it's perfectly acceptable to "check out" members of the opposite sex they're not involved with. Meanwhile, approximately 25% either don't feel this is acceptable or aren't sure about the matter. I hadn't thought about this matter for a while, but since I've been dating a woman for about 8 months, the topic has been pondered about some. When reading or hearing others discuss this very issue, I often times hear comments similar to the following: "It's human nature to look." "There's nothing wrong with checking others out. I'm sure he/she does it too!" "It's fine to do it. Just don't tell your boyfriend/girlfriend about it or do it in front of them!" "It's natural to find people attractive." When observing the array of comments, I i

The verdict is in. To no one's surprise, Jonathan Hoenig has been found guilty of being an idiot.

Just recently, when discussing the Michael Brown shooting and whether or not race had anything to do with it, Fox News contributor Jonathan Hoenig said, "You know who talks about race? Racists." One moment while I provide Mr. Hoenig with the well deserved slow-clap. :: slow-claps for two seconds :: So, that was quite the line by Mr. Hoenig, wasn't it? "You know who talks about race? Racists." Well, wasn't he just talking about race? So, by his own words, I guess that makes him a racist. Also, if he wants to be consistent, does this mean that people whom talk about gender are sexists and people whom talk about sexual orientation are homophobes? With that line of thinking, Hoenig would engage in the following back-and-forths: Hoenig: "So, who are you voting for?" A woman: "The Democratic candidate, because he's been adamant about his support for equal rights for women." Hoenig: "You sexist feminist nazi!"