Skip to main content

Missouri state Rep. Mike Leara supports gun rights over human rights! Hooray!

Just recently, Missouri state Representative Mike Leara (Republican) proposed a bill which said the following - "...[a]ny member of the general assembly who proposes a piece of legislation that further restricts the right of an individual to bear arms, as set forth under the second amendment of the Constitution of the United States, shall be guilty of a class D felony."

Sure, this proposed bill ironically violates the Missouri Constitution, but still... Is Representative Leara really wanting to bring gun control debate to a screeching halt? Do Second Amendment rights trump First Amendment rights in his opinion? Don't the two kind of connect with one another in a way?

In Mr. Leara's mind, he seems to think, "Everyone should have the right to own and fire any gun of their choosing anywhere at any point in time. If someone doesn't want to own or fire a gun, that's their choice as well. However, if anyone wants to debate gun rights, he or she shall go to a pound-me-in-the-a*s prison for at least one life term, if not twenty-two of them. You know what? Check that. If anyone wants to debate gun rights, he or she shall be executed by way of a firing squad. Free speech for humans is overrated. Free speech for guns is what it's all about. My gun is an extension of me and when it goes off, I feel so much better. Whether or not I harm anyone in the process of firing my erect quick-strike gun is of no relevance. This is my right and their dissent shall not be heard. If it is heard, they shall be killed. Take that, First Amendment supporters!"

In light of this bit of news, it's rumored that Mr. Leara wants to pass legislation which would squelch debates on the following issues:

 - Taxes: If anyone even contemplates the raising of taxes on the wealthiest in this country, he or she shall see their taxes raised to former Republican President Dwight D. Eisenhower levels - over 90%! If some of the wealthiest support this, then that goes for you too!

- Gay marriage: If anyone wants to debate gay marriage rights, they will be considered gay by the state of Missouri and will be prohibited of ever getting married, having kids, or watching a film starring Chuck Norris.

- Equal pay: If any female expresses support for the equal pay rights of women, she shall be forced to have the word "FEMINAZI" tattooed to her forehead. If any male expresses support for the equal pay rights of women, he shall be neutered and forced to carry his balls in a little bag hanging around his neck, which reads, "I'VE GOT NO BALLS."

http://thinkprogress.org/justice/2013/02/19/1607891/unconstitutional-missouri-bill-makes-it-a-felony-for-lawmakers-to-propose-gun-safety-legislation/

http://news.yahoo.com/eisenhower-obama-wealthiest-americans-pay-taxes-193734550--abc-news.html

Comments

  1. Some politicians are undoubtedly loony wackadoodles. Maybe someone should propose a piece of legislation that states if Mr. Leara says anything crazy, he's guilty of a felony. He'd be screaming for his first amendment rights then.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Yeah, if that were the case, I have a hunch Mr. Leara (and many others) would have started serving time many years ago.

    By the way, I think you should copyright that term "loony wackadoodles," send it to Saturday Night Live, The Daily Show, and The Colbert Report and see what they can do with it. I have to admit, that term made me chuckle.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Boycotting jukeboxes because of TouchTunes

I love music and enjoy hitting the bar(s) over the weekend, so naturally, when the mood strikes me, I've never been coy about playing some songs on the jukebox. This past Thursday, a friend of mine turned 50, so several friends of her's, including myself, all met up to celebrate the occasion. At around 9:30, a friend of mine and I both chipped in $5 to play some songs on the jukebox. Four hours and 231 skips later, we gave up on hearing the songs we had selected, and went home knowing we had just wasted $5. This wasn't the first time such a thing had happened to me (and many others), and due to that, I'll be boycotting jukeboxes. Why? The scam known as TouchTunes. You see, here's how the plot typically breaks down. A person (or group of people) downloads the TouchTunes app on his/her phone, consumes one too many adult beverages, and due to this, has less care for spending extra money to hear the songs of their choosing right NOW. That's the thing with TouchTun

The difference between "looking" and "checking out"

I may be way off with these numbers, but it's my approximation that at least 75% of individuals whom are involved in a serious relationship feel it's perfectly acceptable to "check out" members of the opposite sex they're not involved with. Meanwhile, approximately 25% either don't feel this is acceptable or aren't sure about the matter. I hadn't thought about this matter for a while, but since I've been dating a woman for about 8 months, the topic has been pondered about some. When reading or hearing others discuss this very issue, I often times hear comments similar to the following: "It's human nature to look." "There's nothing wrong with checking others out. I'm sure he/she does it too!" "It's fine to do it. Just don't tell your boyfriend/girlfriend about it or do it in front of them!" "It's natural to find people attractive." When observing the array of comments, I i

The verdict is in. To no one's surprise, Jonathan Hoenig has been found guilty of being an idiot.

Just recently, when discussing the Michael Brown shooting and whether or not race had anything to do with it, Fox News contributor Jonathan Hoenig said, "You know who talks about race? Racists." One moment while I provide Mr. Hoenig with the well deserved slow-clap. :: slow-claps for two seconds :: So, that was quite the line by Mr. Hoenig, wasn't it? "You know who talks about race? Racists." Well, wasn't he just talking about race? So, by his own words, I guess that makes him a racist. Also, if he wants to be consistent, does this mean that people whom talk about gender are sexists and people whom talk about sexual orientation are homophobes? With that line of thinking, Hoenig would engage in the following back-and-forths: Hoenig: "So, who are you voting for?" A woman: "The Democratic candidate, because he's been adamant about his support for equal rights for women." Hoenig: "You sexist feminist nazi!"