Skip to main content

Coincidence is nonexistent to conspiracists

To die-hard conspiracists, it seems that coincidence is nonexistent. Everything has to happen for a reason - everything has to have been planned by a person or group of people - probably a person or people of power.

From Hurricane Katrina to Hurricane Sandy to the Columbine school shooting to the Sandy Hook school shooting to Benghazi to Oklahoma City to global warming to President Obama being elected and beyond, I can all but guarantee there is at least one group of people who believes in some sort of conspiracy theory explaining these events.

I can understand conspiracy theorists to an extent. Most people want to understand the world's happenings and believe there's a reason to the madness. On that level, I see conspiracy theories as somewhat reminiscent of religious beliefs. While I myself am not religious, I can understand why many are. Many have the need to feel a sense of order to the world - to feel a purpose for their lives as well as others'. However, unlike with religious individuals, whom I can't prove are right or wrong, conspiracy theorists are debunked more times than A Christmas Story has been showcased on TBS during December 24th and 25th.

One of the joys in life, in my opinion, is to know how much we don't know, keep those figurative upstairs doors open, and through that, continually expand our knowledge. It's much more difficult to accept new bits of knowledge when we've closed those doors, wanting to believe we know more than we do through theories which have either been unproven or thoroughly debunked. Why deny ourselves knowledge due to a fear of not knowing?

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Boycotting jukeboxes because of TouchTunes

I love music and enjoy hitting the bar(s) over the weekend, so naturally, when the mood strikes me, I've never been coy about playing some songs on the jukebox. This past Thursday, a friend of mine turned 50, so several friends of her's, including myself, all met up to celebrate the occasion. At around 9:30, a friend of mine and I both chipped in $5 to play some songs on the jukebox. Four hours and 231 skips later, we gave up on hearing the songs we had selected, and went home knowing we had just wasted $5. This wasn't the first time such a thing had happened to me (and many others), and due to that, I'll be boycotting jukeboxes. Why? The scam known as TouchTunes. You see, here's how the plot typically breaks down. A person (or group of people) downloads the TouchTunes app on his/her phone, consumes one too many adult beverages, and due to this, has less care for spending extra money to hear the songs of their choosing right NOW. That's the thing with TouchTun...

Face guarding is legal in college football and the NFL

I just wanted to remind fans and announcers especially, that face guarding is legal in both college football and the NFL. It all comes down to contact. So long as a defender doesn't make contact with an intended receiver, he doesn't have to turn around to play the ball. I can't tell you how many times every week I hear announcers talk about face guarding being a penalty. It's not. I even heard one announcer yesterday state, "If the defender doesn't turn around and play the ball, the ref will call pass interference every time." That's simply not true. Courtesy of referee Bill LeMonnier, he says this with regard to the rule at the college level (answered on 8/12/13): "NCAA rules on pass interference require the face guarding to have contact to be a foul. No contact, no foul by NCAA rules." In the NFL rule book, this is written:  "Actions that constitute defensive pass interference include but are not limited to: (a) Contact by a ...