Skip to main content

Why must everything be posted on Facebook?

I've written about this a couple of times before, but after reading through some very personal Facebook statuses today, I have to ask, must we share everything on social networking sites?

I have friends, family, even a girlfriend, but after I experience things with them, I don't feel the need to tell the world every last detail about them. If anything, I may briefly mention a happening and find a way to be stimulate laughter by integrating humor. This is especially the case with my relationship. Granted, my girlfriend and I aren't too fond of romantic comedies and romance novels. This is especially the case with her. Yes, I like romantic comedies more than my girlfriend. In any case, you're not going to see us typing the following statuses at any point in the future:

"X years ago today, I began a wonderful journey with my one true love - (name). He's/She's the most perfect boyfriend/girlfriend/husband/wife anyone could ever ask for, and I'm forever grateful. Thank you, honey, for (X) wonderful years! I love you. Hugs and kisses."

Wouldn't a message like that be better served by just telling that one person, rather than hundreds of friends, family members, and acquaintances?

It kind of cracks me up (not literally) how many "likes" such statuses generate, because I can almost guarantee you that a large majority of these "likers" only "liked" the status because the person is a friend and they want to show that they're happy for them, even though they're gagging while reading the post.

It's great if these people are genuinely happy and truly mean what they say via these personal posts. However, I'd be much more touched to actually see and hear a woman I care about tell me such things face-to-face rather than read them on Facebook. Perhaps I'm a little old-fashioned in that regard, but for as much time as I spend on the computer, I'd much rather a woman and I express our feelings for one another privately than in the social networking world.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Boycotting jukeboxes because of TouchTunes

I love music and enjoy hitting the bar(s) over the weekend, so naturally, when the mood strikes me, I've never been coy about playing some songs on the jukebox. This past Thursday, a friend of mine turned 50, so several friends of her's, including myself, all met up to celebrate the occasion. At around 9:30, a friend of mine and I both chipped in $5 to play some songs on the jukebox. Four hours and 231 skips later, we gave up on hearing the songs we had selected, and went home knowing we had just wasted $5. This wasn't the first time such a thing had happened to me (and many others), and due to that, I'll be boycotting jukeboxes. Why? The scam known as TouchTunes. You see, here's how the plot typically breaks down. A person (or group of people) downloads the TouchTunes app on his/her phone, consumes one too many adult beverages, and due to this, has less care for spending extra money to hear the songs of their choosing right NOW. That's the thing with TouchTun

The difference between "looking" and "checking out"

I may be way off with these numbers, but it's my approximation that at least 75% of individuals whom are involved in a serious relationship feel it's perfectly acceptable to "check out" members of the opposite sex they're not involved with. Meanwhile, approximately 25% either don't feel this is acceptable or aren't sure about the matter. I hadn't thought about this matter for a while, but since I've been dating a woman for about 8 months, the topic has been pondered about some. When reading or hearing others discuss this very issue, I often times hear comments similar to the following: "It's human nature to look." "There's nothing wrong with checking others out. I'm sure he/she does it too!" "It's fine to do it. Just don't tell your boyfriend/girlfriend about it or do it in front of them!" "It's natural to find people attractive." When observing the array of comments, I i

The verdict is in. To no one's surprise, Jonathan Hoenig has been found guilty of being an idiot.

Just recently, when discussing the Michael Brown shooting and whether or not race had anything to do with it, Fox News contributor Jonathan Hoenig said, "You know who talks about race? Racists." One moment while I provide Mr. Hoenig with the well deserved slow-clap. :: slow-claps for two seconds :: So, that was quite the line by Mr. Hoenig, wasn't it? "You know who talks about race? Racists." Well, wasn't he just talking about race? So, by his own words, I guess that makes him a racist. Also, if he wants to be consistent, does this mean that people whom talk about gender are sexists and people whom talk about sexual orientation are homophobes? With that line of thinking, Hoenig would engage in the following back-and-forths: Hoenig: "So, who are you voting for?" A woman: "The Democratic candidate, because he's been adamant about his support for equal rights for women." Hoenig: "You sexist feminist nazi!"