Skip to main content

"Well, isn't that convenient?" - Missouri State Senator Brian Nieves on abortions due to health complications

Missouri state Senate Majority Whip and man most targeted on dart boards by women - Brian Nieves - just recently got into another lovely abortion debate.

After being provided examples of medical reasons why women may opt for an abortion in the third trimester (including heart failure, diabetes, renal disease, hypertension, and severe fetal deformities), Nieves responded by saying, "'Life of the Mother?' Your own argument proves it is a matter of convenience!"

Yes, a third-trimester abortion due to health complications is obviously a matter of convenience. The most common such complication is what is called an ectopic pregnancy. Such pregnancies are life-threatening and occur between one in 40 to one in every 100 pregnancies. Again, such pregnancies are only matters of "convenience."

It really boggles my mind how so many far-right Republican men pretend to know more about the female body than they or doctors do. What such individuals are implying is that they, whom will never get pregnant, know women could never die due to a pregnancy, and that it's best to go through with such dangerous pregnancies to quite possibly end the mother's life and the child's as well just in hope that the child can survive, but without a mother. Here's how such a conversation between a person like Brian Nieves and a respected woman doctor plays out in my mind:

Doctor Smarterthanyou: "So, a third-trimester abortion due to health risks is a matter of convenience?"

Nieves: "Yes, yes it is."

Doctor Smarterthanyou: "What about ectopic pregnancies?"

Nieves: "What are those?"

Doctor Smarterthanyou: "They're life-threatening pregnancies which occur between one in 40 to one in every 100 pregnancies, and which often result in late abortions to spare the mother her life."

Nieves: "Well, isn't that 'convenient?' What about the child's rights and life?"

Doctor Smarterthanyou: "The child's life likely wouldn't be spared in such a pregnancy either. Would you rather both the child and mother die than just the child?"

Nieves: "I want the mother to die, but the child to live, as God intended."

Doctor Smarterthanyou: "How is that as God intended?"

Nieves: "It says so in the Bible."

Doctor Smarterthanyou: "What book?"

Nieves: "Every book!"

Doctor Smarterthanyou: "I think you're mistaken."

Nieves: "Whatever. A fetus should have more rights than a woman. It's as simple as that."

Doctor Smarterthanyou: "Okay... Let me try this from a different angle. Would you consider yourself a family man, Mr. Nieves?"

Nieves: "What kind of question is that? Of course, I do. I'm all about the family - as God intended - a working husband, slave wife, and lots of kids."

Doctor Smarterthanyou: "::sighs:: Alright, so, you feel that the wife and mother of a family is just as important a component as any other - would that be accurate?"

Nieves: "Yeah, I suppose."

Doctor Smarterthanyou: "Okay then... So, if I were able to guarantee that a woman's life could be saved with an abortion due to some serious health risks during pregnancy, would it not be better for the present and future family for her to have an abortion, so that the child she and her husband hopefully have one day can grow up with both a mother and a father, rather than me not performing the abortion, the woman dying, and the child growing up without a mother?"

Nieves: "It's all in God's hands. Women should not ever have abortions - period!"

Doctor Smarterthanyou: "In God's hands? Wouldn't their lives kind of be in my hands, since I'd be the one working on saving at least one of their lives?"

Nieves: "That's just science crap."

Doctor Smarterthanyou: "So, everything is in God's hands and there's nothing we can do about it?"

Nieves: "Yup."

Doctor Smarterthanyou: "The Holocaust?"

Nieves: "Yup."

Doctor Smarterthanyou: "Did you know Jesus was Jewish?"

Nieves: "What? Sinner!"

Doctor Smarterthanyou: "He was. Look it up. So, according to you, it was as God intended for six million Jews to be killed during this time, all the while his son was Jewish?"

Nieves: "Yes! What part of as God intended don't you understand? Everything that happens ends up being good, because everything is controlled by God. Everything happens for a reason - because of God!"

Doctor Smarterthanyou: "So, it was as God intended for President Obama to be elected twice?"

Nieves: "No. That was just voter fraud!"

Doctor Smarterthanyou: "So, God didn't control that? But, I thought he controlled everything."

Nieves: "Go to hell!"

Doctor Smarterthanyou: "After talking to you for a few minutes, I think I can safely say I've been there."

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/07/23/brian-nieves_n_3640587.html

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Boycotting jukeboxes because of TouchTunes

I love music and enjoy hitting the bar(s) over the weekend, so naturally, when the mood strikes me, I've never been coy about playing some songs on the jukebox. This past Thursday, a friend of mine turned 50, so several friends of her's, including myself, all met up to celebrate the occasion. At around 9:30, a friend of mine and I both chipped in $5 to play some songs on the jukebox. Four hours and 231 skips later, we gave up on hearing the songs we had selected, and went home knowing we had just wasted $5. This wasn't the first time such a thing had happened to me (and many others), and due to that, I'll be boycotting jukeboxes. Why? The scam known as TouchTunes. You see, here's how the plot typically breaks down. A person (or group of people) downloads the TouchTunes app on his/her phone, consumes one too many adult beverages, and due to this, has less care for spending extra money to hear the songs of their choosing right NOW. That's the thing with TouchTun

The difference between "looking" and "checking out"

I may be way off with these numbers, but it's my approximation that at least 75% of individuals whom are involved in a serious relationship feel it's perfectly acceptable to "check out" members of the opposite sex they're not involved with. Meanwhile, approximately 25% either don't feel this is acceptable or aren't sure about the matter. I hadn't thought about this matter for a while, but since I've been dating a woman for about 8 months, the topic has been pondered about some. When reading or hearing others discuss this very issue, I often times hear comments similar to the following: "It's human nature to look." "There's nothing wrong with checking others out. I'm sure he/she does it too!" "It's fine to do it. Just don't tell your boyfriend/girlfriend about it or do it in front of them!" "It's natural to find people attractive." When observing the array of comments, I i

The verdict is in. To no one's surprise, Jonathan Hoenig has been found guilty of being an idiot.

Just recently, when discussing the Michael Brown shooting and whether or not race had anything to do with it, Fox News contributor Jonathan Hoenig said, "You know who talks about race? Racists." One moment while I provide Mr. Hoenig with the well deserved slow-clap. :: slow-claps for two seconds :: So, that was quite the line by Mr. Hoenig, wasn't it? "You know who talks about race? Racists." Well, wasn't he just talking about race? So, by his own words, I guess that makes him a racist. Also, if he wants to be consistent, does this mean that people whom talk about gender are sexists and people whom talk about sexual orientation are homophobes? With that line of thinking, Hoenig would engage in the following back-and-forths: Hoenig: "So, who are you voting for?" A woman: "The Democratic candidate, because he's been adamant about his support for equal rights for women." Hoenig: "You sexist feminist nazi!"