Skip to main content

A study disproves the NRA's talking points

David Hemenway, director of the Harvard Injury Control Research Center, has been conducting a study regarding guns, gun violence, and whether or not the National Rifle Association's talking points are at all valid. Unfortunately for the NRA, to this point, the study's findings send a very clear message to the powerful gun lobby: "You're wrong!"

Hemenway modeled his study off the 2010 study on climate change, where it was reported that 97% of climate scientists believe humans to be responsible for global warming. He and his team of researchers looked through 1,200 gun-related articles published since 2011 "in peer-reviewed journals focused on public health, public policy, sociology, and criminology." Hemenway then sent surveys to the authors of these very articles on a monthly basis (up to 300 per), asking these gun experts an array of questions regarding the topic. To this point, nine surveys have been completed, with approximately 100 of the gun experts/researchers responding to each. Here's how the results have played out thus far:

"Do you think having a gun in the house makes it a safer or a more dangerous place to be?"

More dangerous: 64%

Neutral/It depends: 32%

Safer: 5%

Difference: 59% (between more dangerous and safer)


"Strong gun laws help reduce homicide."

Agree: 71%

Neutral/Don't know: 18%

Disagree: 12%

Difference: 59%


"The change in state-level concealed carry laws in the United States over the past few decades from more restrictive to more permissive has reduced crime rates."

Disagree: 62%

Neutral/Don't know: 29%

Agree: 9%

Difference: 53%


"In the United States, guns are used in self-defense far more often than they are used in crime."

Disagree: 73%

Neutral/Don't know: 20%

Agree: 8%

Difference: 65%


"In the United States, having a gun in the home increases the risk of suicide."

Agree: 84%

Neutral/Don't know: 8%

Disagree: 8%

Difference: 76%


"In the United States, having a gun in the home increases the risk that a woman living in the home will be a victim of homicide."

Agree: 72%

Neutral/Don't know: 17%

Disagree: 11%

Difference: 61%


"Internationally, and in the United States, evidence indicates that background checks can help keep guns out of the hands of a significant number of violent people."

Agree: 60%

Neutral/Don't know: 23%

Disagree: 16%

Difference: 44%


"Safe storage (e.g., unloaded, locked up) of firearms in the home reduces the likelihood of suicide."

Agree: 65%

Neutral/Don't know: 18%

Disagree: 17%

Difference: 48%


Average numbers

More gun-control crowd: 68.9%

Neutral: 20.6%

Less gun-control crowd: 10.8%

Difference: 58.1%


So, on average, out of every ten gun experts/researchers out there, approximately seven believe guns to be dangerous and that more gun laws would mean less crime, one believes the direct opposite, and two are uncertain which way they lean at this point. No, these numbers aren't quite as staggering as those in the 2010 climate-change study, but they're pretty significant nevertheless.

97% of climate scientists believe in global warming

Nearly 70% of gun experts dismiss NRA's talking points

I can just hear the NRA's response now. I'm guessing it will be one (or all) of the following:

- "The only way to stop a bad guy with a survey is a good guy with a survey!"

- "More studies means less reading!"

- "Studies don't teach people; people teach people!"

http://www.motherjones.com/politics/2015/04/gun-research-harvard-nra

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Boycotting jukeboxes because of TouchTunes

I love music and enjoy hitting the bar(s) over the weekend, so naturally, when the mood strikes me, I've never been coy about playing some songs on the jukebox. This past Thursday, a friend of mine turned 50, so several friends of her's, including myself, all met up to celebrate the occasion. At around 9:30, a friend of mine and I both chipped in $5 to play some songs on the jukebox. Four hours and 231 skips later, we gave up on hearing the songs we had selected, and went home knowing we had just wasted $5. This wasn't the first time such a thing had happened to me (and many others), and due to that, I'll be boycotting jukeboxes. Why? The scam known as TouchTunes. You see, here's how the plot typically breaks down. A person (or group of people) downloads the TouchTunes app on his/her phone, consumes one too many adult beverages, and due to this, has less care for spending extra money to hear the songs of their choosing right NOW. That's the thing with TouchTun

The difference between "looking" and "checking out"

I may be way off with these numbers, but it's my approximation that at least 75% of individuals whom are involved in a serious relationship feel it's perfectly acceptable to "check out" members of the opposite sex they're not involved with. Meanwhile, approximately 25% either don't feel this is acceptable or aren't sure about the matter. I hadn't thought about this matter for a while, but since I've been dating a woman for about 8 months, the topic has been pondered about some. When reading or hearing others discuss this very issue, I often times hear comments similar to the following: "It's human nature to look." "There's nothing wrong with checking others out. I'm sure he/she does it too!" "It's fine to do it. Just don't tell your boyfriend/girlfriend about it or do it in front of them!" "It's natural to find people attractive." When observing the array of comments, I i

The verdict is in. To no one's surprise, Jonathan Hoenig has been found guilty of being an idiot.

Just recently, when discussing the Michael Brown shooting and whether or not race had anything to do with it, Fox News contributor Jonathan Hoenig said, "You know who talks about race? Racists." One moment while I provide Mr. Hoenig with the well deserved slow-clap. :: slow-claps for two seconds :: So, that was quite the line by Mr. Hoenig, wasn't it? "You know who talks about race? Racists." Well, wasn't he just talking about race? So, by his own words, I guess that makes him a racist. Also, if he wants to be consistent, does this mean that people whom talk about gender are sexists and people whom talk about sexual orientation are homophobes? With that line of thinking, Hoenig would engage in the following back-and-forths: Hoenig: "So, who are you voting for?" A woman: "The Democratic candidate, because he's been adamant about his support for equal rights for women." Hoenig: "You sexist feminist nazi!"