Skip to main content

Are Republicans really this devoid of reality?

I once heard a person say, "I don't care if a person hates me; I just hope it's for the right reason(s)." Likewise, I don't care if Republicans hate President Obama; I just hope it's for the right reason(s), and this goes for the Affordable Care Act (Obamacare) as well. Unfortunately, it appears most of them are still trying to find that "right" reason to despise both as a recent poll shows.

According to a recently released YouGov.com poll, just 43% of Republicans believe the Affordable Care Act has resulted in an increase in the number of people with health insurance, while 25% believe that number has remained the same, and 21% believe the ACA has actually resulted in a decrease in that very number. That's right, over 1 in 5 Republicans believe "Obamacare" has done the direct opposite of expanding healthcare coverage across the country and more believe the healthcare law has either resulted in no change or a decrease in the number of those with health insurance (44%) than believe it's increased the number of those insured (43%). Again, if a Republican truly has an issue with Obamacare, so be it, but don't let that reason be due to hatred, ignorance, and/or denial.

On March 16th of this year, CNN reported that 16.4 million people have gained healthcare coverage since Obamacare became a law (yes, 16,400,000 people). Not only that, but Gallup reported earlier this year that the uninsured rate has dropped to its lowest point since they started tracking it in 2008 (daily tracking), down from 17.1% in the fourth quarter of 2013 to 12.9% in the fourth quarter a year later.

Let's break this down a little further:

GOPers whom believe Obamacare has resulted in no change or a decrease in the number of those with health insurance: 44% (50.6% of respondents)

The actual number: +16,400,000 (+16.4 million)


Are Republicans really this devoid of reality? To criticize the healthcare law for not bringing down prices much in most cases or to criticize the website's problems at the start of the enrollment process would be one thing (or two things), but to completely deny the reality that the law has resulted in a substantial increase in those with health insurance has to simply be the result of hatred, ignorance, and/or denial.

Well, I best be going. I'm going to burn some calories while I jog for a couple of miles, which, according to at least 44% of Republicans, means I'm going to either not not burn any calories at all or will wind up adding calories through jogging. Wish me luck!

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2015/04/27/obamacare-poll-repeal_n_7153216.html

http://www.cnn.com/2015/03/16/politics/obamacare-numbers-16-million-insured-rate/

http://www.politico.com/story/2015/01/poll-americans-uninsured-rate-low-114027.html

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Boycotting jukeboxes because of TouchTunes

I love music and enjoy hitting the bar(s) over the weekend, so naturally, when the mood strikes me, I've never been coy about playing some songs on the jukebox. This past Thursday, a friend of mine turned 50, so several friends of her's, including myself, all met up to celebrate the occasion. At around 9:30, a friend of mine and I both chipped in $5 to play some songs on the jukebox. Four hours and 231 skips later, we gave up on hearing the songs we had selected, and went home knowing we had just wasted $5. This wasn't the first time such a thing had happened to me (and many others), and due to that, I'll be boycotting jukeboxes. Why? The scam known as TouchTunes. You see, here's how the plot typically breaks down. A person (or group of people) downloads the TouchTunes app on his/her phone, consumes one too many adult beverages, and due to this, has less care for spending extra money to hear the songs of their choosing right NOW. That's the thing with TouchTun

The difference between "looking" and "checking out"

I may be way off with these numbers, but it's my approximation that at least 75% of individuals whom are involved in a serious relationship feel it's perfectly acceptable to "check out" members of the opposite sex they're not involved with. Meanwhile, approximately 25% either don't feel this is acceptable or aren't sure about the matter. I hadn't thought about this matter for a while, but since I've been dating a woman for about 8 months, the topic has been pondered about some. When reading or hearing others discuss this very issue, I often times hear comments similar to the following: "It's human nature to look." "There's nothing wrong with checking others out. I'm sure he/she does it too!" "It's fine to do it. Just don't tell your boyfriend/girlfriend about it or do it in front of them!" "It's natural to find people attractive." When observing the array of comments, I i

The verdict is in. To no one's surprise, Jonathan Hoenig has been found guilty of being an idiot.

Just recently, when discussing the Michael Brown shooting and whether or not race had anything to do with it, Fox News contributor Jonathan Hoenig said, "You know who talks about race? Racists." One moment while I provide Mr. Hoenig with the well deserved slow-clap. :: slow-claps for two seconds :: So, that was quite the line by Mr. Hoenig, wasn't it? "You know who talks about race? Racists." Well, wasn't he just talking about race? So, by his own words, I guess that makes him a racist. Also, if he wants to be consistent, does this mean that people whom talk about gender are sexists and people whom talk about sexual orientation are homophobes? With that line of thinking, Hoenig would engage in the following back-and-forths: Hoenig: "So, who are you voting for?" A woman: "The Democratic candidate, because he's been adamant about his support for equal rights for women." Hoenig: "You sexist feminist nazi!"