Skip to main content

How the rich have brainwashed the middle-class to blame the poor

The American dream is a lovely concept. It contends that no matter who you are or where you came from, if you continually showcase a good work ethic, dedication, and determination, this dream can become a reality. You'll have a big house in the suburbs, a beautiful wife/handsome husband, a couple of kids, a dog, a white picket fence, backyard barbecues in the summer,  and an annual family vacation. In other words, you'll be living the dream. However, it seems that over the past 30+ years, while this dream is still feasible for a decent percentage of people and their families, it's becoming decreasingly likely. Trickle-down economics, certain tax breaks and loopholes, and through that, a growing disparity between the top 1-2% and everybody else, has left many in the middle-class living paycheck to paycheck, and many in the lower-class searching for second and third jobs in order to just make ends meet. Sadly, while the rich have been continuing to get richer these past 30+ years, they've appeared to maintain this superior and guilt-free image to much of the public, all the while most the attention and blame for our economic struggles have been directed at the poor. I have a feeling this is largely due to the concepts of hope and denial.

I think most Americans want to believe in the American dream. They want to believe if they work hard enough, stay dedicated to their jobs, and are determined enough to succeed, this will result in them living the American dream. Due to this hope and denial, they often times find themselves defending the wealthiest among us, claiming that these very individuals obviously worked hard for their fortunes and earned every single penny along the way. If these rich individuals find tax loopholes in order to spend less come tax day, many will call this simply a smart business move, and due to all the hard work the wealthy put forth, they've earned the right to do this. This is why many of these same "hopeful" Americans tend to cast the poor as lazy and as moochers, because in their minds, the American dream is a feasible destination for everyone, so if a person falls short, it's obviously due to a lack of work ethic, dedication, and determination. Also, while it was a smart business move for the wealthiest to find tax loopholes to pay less come tax day, the poor asking for money are simply moochers seeking government handouts.

The poorest among us are difficult for the most ardent of American dream believers to comprehend, because to them, they illustrate what's wrong with our economic system, and instead of thinking about where we went wrong, they'd rather just cast these people off as lazy moochers, so their vision of the ever so feasible American dream is still in tact. As in denial as they may be, however, their consciences still aren't seeing the whole picture, for along with the poorest among us, the richest among us are a direct illustration of what's wrong with our economic system. While some do work hard for their fortunes, others inherit theirs, and while some whom are poor are in fact lazy, others work extraordinarily hard. The fact of the matter is, no matter how hard one works anymore in this country, if one is born in a wealthy family, the odds are good that trend will continue into adulthood, and if one is born in a poor family, the odds are good that trend will continue as well. Yes, there are exceptions to those odds, but again, they're exceptions. The truth is that corporations and the richest among us can afford to find loopholes and find ways to cheat the country out of a great deal more money than the poor could ever fathom. Yet since they're obscenely wealthy, many Americans give them a pass on their lack of ethics, while instead choosing to cast the poor as this country's scapegoat, because to them, these individuals are poor only due to a lack of work and effort. In the meantime, the top 1-2% are laughing at the notion of the American dream, because to them, this "dream" is a substandard way of life, not realizing it's truly a dream for the other 98-99%. Unfortunately, the longer we allow the wealthy to convince the middle-class that the poor is to blame for this country's financial ills, the more they'll be laughing at the rest of us, and the more unlikely it will be for those in the middle- and lower-classes to achieve the American dream.

http://billmoyers.com/2014/01/16/ten-examples-of-welfare-for-corporations-and-the-ultra-rich/

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Boycotting jukeboxes because of TouchTunes

I love music and enjoy hitting the bar(s) over the weekend, so naturally, when the mood strikes me, I've never been coy about playing some songs on the jukebox. This past Thursday, a friend of mine turned 50, so several friends of her's, including myself, all met up to celebrate the occasion. At around 9:30, a friend of mine and I both chipped in $5 to play some songs on the jukebox. Four hours and 231 skips later, we gave up on hearing the songs we had selected, and went home knowing we had just wasted $5. This wasn't the first time such a thing had happened to me (and many others), and due to that, I'll be boycotting jukeboxes. Why? The scam known as TouchTunes. You see, here's how the plot typically breaks down. A person (or group of people) downloads the TouchTunes app on his/her phone, consumes one too many adult beverages, and due to this, has less care for spending extra money to hear the songs of their choosing right NOW. That's the thing with TouchTun

The difference between "looking" and "checking out"

I may be way off with these numbers, but it's my approximation that at least 75% of individuals whom are involved in a serious relationship feel it's perfectly acceptable to "check out" members of the opposite sex they're not involved with. Meanwhile, approximately 25% either don't feel this is acceptable or aren't sure about the matter. I hadn't thought about this matter for a while, but since I've been dating a woman for about 8 months, the topic has been pondered about some. When reading or hearing others discuss this very issue, I often times hear comments similar to the following: "It's human nature to look." "There's nothing wrong with checking others out. I'm sure he/she does it too!" "It's fine to do it. Just don't tell your boyfriend/girlfriend about it or do it in front of them!" "It's natural to find people attractive." When observing the array of comments, I i

The verdict is in. To no one's surprise, Jonathan Hoenig has been found guilty of being an idiot.

Just recently, when discussing the Michael Brown shooting and whether or not race had anything to do with it, Fox News contributor Jonathan Hoenig said, "You know who talks about race? Racists." One moment while I provide Mr. Hoenig with the well deserved slow-clap. :: slow-claps for two seconds :: So, that was quite the line by Mr. Hoenig, wasn't it? "You know who talks about race? Racists." Well, wasn't he just talking about race? So, by his own words, I guess that makes him a racist. Also, if he wants to be consistent, does this mean that people whom talk about gender are sexists and people whom talk about sexual orientation are homophobes? With that line of thinking, Hoenig would engage in the following back-and-forths: Hoenig: "So, who are you voting for?" A woman: "The Democratic candidate, because he's been adamant about his support for equal rights for women." Hoenig: "You sexist feminist nazi!"