Skip to main content

When an eternal optimist sounds eternally stupid

I read a Columbus Dispatch letter-to-the-editor today and honestly had to reread it to make certain it wasn't written by someone at The Onion. Sadly, it wasn't. The letter, titled, "Global warming has positive for Earth," was written by Rick Gibbs, and goes as follows:

"I often see letters concerning climate change that seem to have a political leaning. These writers often speak of doom and gloom, yet I never see a letter that mentions that there could be positive changes.

It is estimated that there will be 9 billion people by 2050. Perhaps having vast areas of Canada and Siberia opened to agriculture to help feed the world's hungry people would be a good thing.

Further, it has been said that the polar ice is melting. Perhaps adding more liquid water to the water cycle will increase overall world soil hydration, as well as release more water to give a drink to the world's thirsty people.

Perhaps longer growing cycles will increase diversity in the food crops we all enjoy.

In my life, I have found few things that happen that don't come with benefits as well as negative results."

Yes, so long to the coasts of many countries due to raised sea levels, as well as the inland portions of several countries due to an increased quantity of severe storms (as well as an increase in the severity of the storms), but it will be all for the better; you'll see. Sorry, Florida...

Given Gibbs' positive take on global warming and his philosophy that all things contain both benefits and hindrances, here's how I see him commenting on other issues:

Subject: Poverty

Gibbs: "If a person is poor, that means they get to appreciate all the little things in life more, like food they find in the trash that might make them sick, puddles of dirty water to drink on the street, or toy rocks they can use like Legos to build a giant caveman's castle of some kind."


Subject: Segregation

Gibbs: "Segregation helps people learn about themselves, their history, and grow pride in who they are and where they come from. Without it, we'd lack that self-awareness and just think that we're all people or something."


Subject: The Holocaust

Gibbs: "Jesus was Jewish, so a lot of people went to heaven around that time!"


Yeah, for his next writing, I suggest Mr. Gibbs write a book, entitled, "How To Make An Eternal Optimist Sound Eternally Stupid."

http://www.dispatch.com/content/stories/editorials/2015/03/31/1-global-warming.html

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Boycotting jukeboxes because of TouchTunes

I love music and enjoy hitting the bar(s) over the weekend, so naturally, when the mood strikes me, I've never been coy about playing some songs on the jukebox. This past Thursday, a friend of mine turned 50, so several friends of her's, including myself, all met up to celebrate the occasion. At around 9:30, a friend of mine and I both chipped in $5 to play some songs on the jukebox. Four hours and 231 skips later, we gave up on hearing the songs we had selected, and went home knowing we had just wasted $5. This wasn't the first time such a thing had happened to me (and many others), and due to that, I'll be boycotting jukeboxes. Why? The scam known as TouchTunes. You see, here's how the plot typically breaks down. A person (or group of people) downloads the TouchTunes app on his/her phone, consumes one too many adult beverages, and due to this, has less care for spending extra money to hear the songs of their choosing right NOW. That's the thing with TouchTun

The difference between "looking" and "checking out"

I may be way off with these numbers, but it's my approximation that at least 75% of individuals whom are involved in a serious relationship feel it's perfectly acceptable to "check out" members of the opposite sex they're not involved with. Meanwhile, approximately 25% either don't feel this is acceptable or aren't sure about the matter. I hadn't thought about this matter for a while, but since I've been dating a woman for about 8 months, the topic has been pondered about some. When reading or hearing others discuss this very issue, I often times hear comments similar to the following: "It's human nature to look." "There's nothing wrong with checking others out. I'm sure he/she does it too!" "It's fine to do it. Just don't tell your boyfriend/girlfriend about it or do it in front of them!" "It's natural to find people attractive." When observing the array of comments, I i

The verdict is in. To no one's surprise, Jonathan Hoenig has been found guilty of being an idiot.

Just recently, when discussing the Michael Brown shooting and whether or not race had anything to do with it, Fox News contributor Jonathan Hoenig said, "You know who talks about race? Racists." One moment while I provide Mr. Hoenig with the well deserved slow-clap. :: slow-claps for two seconds :: So, that was quite the line by Mr. Hoenig, wasn't it? "You know who talks about race? Racists." Well, wasn't he just talking about race? So, by his own words, I guess that makes him a racist. Also, if he wants to be consistent, does this mean that people whom talk about gender are sexists and people whom talk about sexual orientation are homophobes? With that line of thinking, Hoenig would engage in the following back-and-forths: Hoenig: "So, who are you voting for?" A woman: "The Democratic candidate, because he's been adamant about his support for equal rights for women." Hoenig: "You sexist feminist nazi!"