Big Douche Bryan Fischer calls out to "Big Gay"

On his radio show Friday, Bryan Fischer of the ultra-conservative American Family Association, made the following statement regarding Indiana's RFRA law (Religious Freedom Restoration Act), the public's reaction, and at the time, Governor Mike Pence's thoughts of revising the controversial bill:

"I'm afraid Governor Pence is dangerously close to allowing the homosexual lobby to get the state of Indiana, to compel people to provide labor against their will. What do we call it when people are compelled to provide labor against their will? Involuntary labor, what do we call that, ladies and gentlemen? That is involuntary servitude, that is slavery, that is something that is forbidden by the Thirteenth Amendment."

He's also made his views about the matter known on his Twitter account, as he's posted the following tweets:

- "The pressure Big Gay has put on Indiana is proof they are not about 'marriage equality' but 'homosexual supremacy.'"

- "Indiana will soon find it is impossible to satisfy the homosexual lobby. They will immediately be back for more. And more."

- "Indiana to Christian wedding vendors: in any conflict between you and Big Gay, we're coming down on the side of Big Gay."

"Big Gay"? Really? Based on that rhetoric, Bryan Fischer just proves himself to be a "Big Douche."

Speaking of the big douche, Bryan Fischer, like a lot of other extreme right-wing individuals, seems to have trouble with the concept of equality. Allow me to try and help him out with that.

When heterosexuals and homosexuals are both allowed to marry the person of their choosing, this would constitute as equality. However, when homosexual couples can get turned away from businesses due to their orientation, whereas heterosexuals aren't, this is inequality. When both groups of people aren't turned away from such businesses, this would not be an example of homosexual supremacy, but again, of equality.

It's really not that difficult of a concept to grasp, but strangely enough, appears to be that way for a growing number of people.

Also, does Mr. Fischer REALLY want to go there with the slavery comparison? Does he really want to contend that a group of people which is fighting to attain equal rights are masters in a way to their slaves that is the rest of the country? Does that mean, according to him, it was an issue of slavery where African-American slaves fought for equal rights so they didn't get turned away by businesses due to the color of their skin? Give me a fricking break...

Yeah, only in Bryan Fischer's world do the real slaves control their masters as slaves. In the real world, Bryan Fischer is just a "Big Douche."

http://www.motherjones.com/mojo/2015/03/bryan-fischer-indiana-law

http://www.rightwingwatch.org/content/bryan-fischer-clarifying-indianas-religious-freedom-law-will-lead-slavery

Boycotting jukeboxes because of TouchTunes

I love music and enjoy hitting the bar(s) over the weekend, so naturally, when the mood strikes me, I've never been coy about playing some songs on the jukebox. This past Thursday, a friend of mine turned 50, so several friends of her's, including myself, all met up to celebrate the occasion. At around 9:30, a friend of mine and I both chipped in $5 to play some songs on the jukebox. Four hours and 231 skips later, we gave up on hearing the songs we had selected, and went home knowing we had just wasted $5. This wasn't the first time such a thing had happened to me (and many others), and due to that, I'll be boycotting jukeboxes. Why? The scam known as TouchTunes. You see, here's how the plot typically breaks down. A person (or group of people) downloads the TouchTunes app on his/her phone, consumes one too many adult beverages, and due to this, has less care for spending extra money to hear the songs of their choosing right NOW. That's the thing with TouchTun

The difference between "looking" and "checking out"

I may be way off with these numbers, but it's my approximation that at least 75% of individuals whom are involved in a serious relationship feel it's perfectly acceptable to "check out" members of the opposite sex they're not involved with. Meanwhile, approximately 25% either don't feel this is acceptable or aren't sure about the matter. I hadn't thought about this matter for a while, but since I've been dating a woman for about 8 months, the topic has been pondered about some. When reading or hearing others discuss this very issue, I often times hear comments similar to the following: "It's human nature to look." "There's nothing wrong with checking others out. I'm sure he/she does it too!" "It's fine to do it. Just don't tell your boyfriend/girlfriend about it or do it in front of them!" "It's natural to find people attractive." When observing the array of comments, I i

The verdict is in. To no one's surprise, Jonathan Hoenig has been found guilty of being an idiot.

Just recently, when discussing the Michael Brown shooting and whether or not race had anything to do with it, Fox News contributor Jonathan Hoenig said, "You know who talks about race? Racists." One moment while I provide Mr. Hoenig with the well deserved slow-clap. :: slow-claps for two seconds :: So, that was quite the line by Mr. Hoenig, wasn't it? "You know who talks about race? Racists." Well, wasn't he just talking about race? So, by his own words, I guess that makes him a racist. Also, if he wants to be consistent, does this mean that people whom talk about gender are sexists and people whom talk about sexual orientation are homophobes? With that line of thinking, Hoenig would engage in the following back-and-forths: Hoenig: "So, who are you voting for?" A woman: "The Democratic candidate, because he's been adamant about his support for equal rights for women." Hoenig: "You sexist feminist nazi!"

The Kind-Hearted Smart Aleck

Search This Blog