Skip to main content

Passing loving oneself off as loving one's country

There's a distinct difference between just loving oneself and loving one's country, yet it appears as if the wealthiest among us, as well as the most conservative of politicians, have been able to increasingly blur those lines over the past several years.

For some strange reason, when a wealthy or powerful person loudly declares that they love this country or that it's the country in the world, people tend to respond, "They're such good, patriotic Americans! Nobody loves this country more than they do!" However, as the old saying goes, "Actions speak louder than words," and their actions tend to tell a different story.

The extremely wealthy, and many far-right conservative politicians for that matter, live in a different world than most of us. They may all have loved this country at one point, but in their minds, they've made it, so now they can afford to stop looking after the country and simply just look after themselves. Many even deny the help (or breaks) they've received along the way to get to where they are, claiming they "built that" all by themselves, when that's never actually the case (well, unless one believes the story of God and he, she, or it in fact God).

Even though most of these people were afforded great educational opportunities, where do such politicians tend to propose their first spending cuts? Education. Environmental concerns seem to be minimal. The idea of raising the minimum wage often times gets greeted with the notion that it will drive companies out of business. The homeless get progressively pushed further and further away from society. Such politicians have no problems sending soldiers to war, but do have problems taking care of them when they return home. Improving our infrastructure is of little importance, as is improving our healthcare system. Prison reform may get discussed (as well as drug laws), but action doesn't seem to follow that talk. Also, the notion that the wealthiest among us should see their taxes decrease at the expense of the middle- and lower-classes, in addition to permitting them to spend countless dollars to influence elections, goes to further illustrate that most such individuals truly just care about themselves and only themselves.

It's simply not enough for a person to say they love this country and that it's the very best. If a person truly loves their country, they'll want to see it continue to prosper. They'll want to see education improve, not be cut. They'll want to see the environment in better shape for our children's future, along with our healthcare system, and infrastructure. They'll want to help this country continue to move forward by aiding it with the dollars needed to assure that, which was a key reason for them finding their success in the first place. As far as I'm concerned, these extremely wealthy individuals and far-right conservative politicians are simply telling the country this:

"Through the aid of others, this great country afforded us the opportunity to succeed at the highest level, and because of that, we think this is the greatest country in the world. However, we got ours, so you get yours, and without our help. That's right, f**k all of you! Oh, and God bless America!"

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Boycotting jukeboxes because of TouchTunes

I love music and enjoy hitting the bar(s) over the weekend, so naturally, when the mood strikes me, I've never been coy about playing some songs on the jukebox. This past Thursday, a friend of mine turned 50, so several friends of her's, including myself, all met up to celebrate the occasion. At around 9:30, a friend of mine and I both chipped in $5 to play some songs on the jukebox. Four hours and 231 skips later, we gave up on hearing the songs we had selected, and went home knowing we had just wasted $5. This wasn't the first time such a thing had happened to me (and many others), and due to that, I'll be boycotting jukeboxes. Why? The scam known as TouchTunes. You see, here's how the plot typically breaks down. A person (or group of people) downloads the TouchTunes app on his/her phone, consumes one too many adult beverages, and due to this, has less care for spending extra money to hear the songs of their choosing right NOW. That's the thing with TouchTun

The difference between "looking" and "checking out"

I may be way off with these numbers, but it's my approximation that at least 75% of individuals whom are involved in a serious relationship feel it's perfectly acceptable to "check out" members of the opposite sex they're not involved with. Meanwhile, approximately 25% either don't feel this is acceptable or aren't sure about the matter. I hadn't thought about this matter for a while, but since I've been dating a woman for about 8 months, the topic has been pondered about some. When reading or hearing others discuss this very issue, I often times hear comments similar to the following: "It's human nature to look." "There's nothing wrong with checking others out. I'm sure he/she does it too!" "It's fine to do it. Just don't tell your boyfriend/girlfriend about it or do it in front of them!" "It's natural to find people attractive." When observing the array of comments, I i

The verdict is in. To no one's surprise, Jonathan Hoenig has been found guilty of being an idiot.

Just recently, when discussing the Michael Brown shooting and whether or not race had anything to do with it, Fox News contributor Jonathan Hoenig said, "You know who talks about race? Racists." One moment while I provide Mr. Hoenig with the well deserved slow-clap. :: slow-claps for two seconds :: So, that was quite the line by Mr. Hoenig, wasn't it? "You know who talks about race? Racists." Well, wasn't he just talking about race? So, by his own words, I guess that makes him a racist. Also, if he wants to be consistent, does this mean that people whom talk about gender are sexists and people whom talk about sexual orientation are homophobes? With that line of thinking, Hoenig would engage in the following back-and-forths: Hoenig: "So, who are you voting for?" A woman: "The Democratic candidate, because he's been adamant about his support for equal rights for women." Hoenig: "You sexist feminist nazi!"