Skip to main content

Does the phrase "persons of color" bother anyone else?

Am I the only one who's bothered by the phrase "persons of color"? I think it rubs me the wrong way for two reasons. First, why is it offensive to use the phrase "colored people" but inoffensive to say "persons of color"? If one is offensive, shouldn't both be offensive? If I were to anger a group of individuals I called "stupid people," wouldn't they likely be angered if I were to alter that phrase to "people of idiocy"?

Secondly, if we take the phrase "persons of color" literally, doesn't it come across as kind of ridiculous? To my knowledge, nobody is clear, colorless, transparent. We all have color to us, from the whitest of white to the blackest of black and everywhere in between. I, like most "white" people, am peachy/pinkish in color. So when I hear someone say "persons of color," my immediate thought is, "So, we're talking about everyone then?"

More times than not we seem to take the easy road out when it comes to people's skin tones, don't we? Back in the day (and sadly even at times in contemporary society), instead of getting to know a person, many often resorted to pulling out that uber-offensive term our dads taught us. Even though 99% of "whites" aren't actually white and a large majority of "blacks" aren't actually black, let's refer to them as whites and blacks anyway. Let's start making hyphens cool for the first time in history. Whether a person was born in this country or came from the planet Neptune, let's be sure to include a hyphen in their description: Anglo-American, African-American, Latino-American, Asian-American, Arab-American, Uranus-American. etc. Those hyphens are a bit long-winded at times, so let's just refer to most every demographic as a minority. Now, minority's too general, so let's help to distinguish minorities from one another with the category "persons of color," because, you know, a large segment of the population is colorless.

How about we stop beating around the bush when it comes to these terms and start referring to such demographics as "persons fighting for equality," because that's what it's really all about, isn't it? Whether we're talking about women, the LGBT community, Muslims, "blacks," Hispanics, etc., in the end, we're/they're all fighting for equality both in the eyes of the law and in the eyes in our American brothers and sisters.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Boycotting jukeboxes because of TouchTunes

I love music and enjoy hitting the bar(s) over the weekend, so naturally, when the mood strikes me, I've never been coy about playing some songs on the jukebox. This past Thursday, a friend of mine turned 50, so several friends of her's, including myself, all met up to celebrate the occasion. At around 9:30, a friend of mine and I both chipped in $5 to play some songs on the jukebox. Four hours and 231 skips later, we gave up on hearing the songs we had selected, and went home knowing we had just wasted $5. This wasn't the first time such a thing had happened to me (and many others), and due to that, I'll be boycotting jukeboxes. Why? The scam known as TouchTunes. You see, here's how the plot typically breaks down. A person (or group of people) downloads the TouchTunes app on his/her phone, consumes one too many adult beverages, and due to this, has less care for spending extra money to hear the songs of their choosing right NOW. That's the thing with TouchTun...

Face guarding is legal in college football and the NFL

I just wanted to remind fans and announcers especially, that face guarding is legal in both college football and the NFL. It all comes down to contact. So long as a defender doesn't make contact with an intended receiver, he doesn't have to turn around to play the ball. I can't tell you how many times every week I hear announcers talk about face guarding being a penalty. It's not. I even heard one announcer yesterday state, "If the defender doesn't turn around and play the ball, the ref will call pass interference every time." That's simply not true. Courtesy of referee Bill LeMonnier, he says this with regard to the rule at the college level (answered on 8/12/13): "NCAA rules on pass interference require the face guarding to have contact to be a foul. No contact, no foul by NCAA rules." In the NFL rule book, this is written:  "Actions that constitute defensive pass interference include but are not limited to: (a) Contact by a ...