Skip to main content

Jesus is facepalming himself over (Jeffrey) Lord's comments

Well, the Lord hath spoken, and it wasn't powerful, pretty, nor even pretty powerful. After Republican House Speaker Paul Ryan criticized presumptive GOP nominee Donald Trump's racist comments regarding Mexican-American judge Gonzalo Curiel (he was born in Indiana), CNN commentator Jeffrey Lord decided to defend Trump by saying this:

"Speaker Ryan is wrong and Speaker Ryan has apparently switched positions and is supporting identity politics, which is racist. I am astonished."

He added:

"I am accusing anybody who believes in identity politics, which he apparently does now, of playing the race card. The Republican establishment is playing this, Senator [Mitch McConnell] is playing this. These people have run and hid and borrowed the Democratic agenda of playing the race card. It's just wrong!"

This is one of the major problems with the modern-day Republican Party - to put it bluntly, they don't know what in the hell they're talking about. They want to reduce abortions, yet are also in favor of abstinence-only education, employers not providing contraception coverage to women in their healthcare plans, and defunding Planned Parenthood, all of which increase the likelihood of women having abortions. They want to decrease gun violence by making it easier for everyone to purchase and own a gun, even felons and terrorists. They want to close the wage gap and prevent another recession by reverting regulations to where they helped prompt the increasing wage gap and the Great Recession. Not only that, but according to many in the modern-day GOP, like Jeffrey Lord implied, it's racist to admit racism exists. Let's break his asinine claim down for a moment...

Donald Trump: "I'm gonna make a bigly racist remark right now."

Paul Ryan: "Trump just made a bigly racist remark."

Jeffrey Lord: "It's racist for Paul Ryan to call out Donald Trump for his racist remark!"

I'm sorry Mr. Lord, but that's not how the "race card" works. If Trump simply said he didn't like a particular judge and this judge said, "That's because I'm Hispanic, isn't it?" that would be playing the "race card." However, Trump brought up this man's heritage as being the main reason why he might not be trustworthy, which is racist. So Speaker Ryan calling Trump out for his racist comment is not in itself racist. While Lord's at it, he might as well make these absurd claims:

- "If you admit to there being gun violence in this country, you're the one that's violent!"

- "If a person says adultery exists, that means the person is probably unfaithful."

- "It's a well-known fact - if you talk about drugs, you do drugs. This is why I've always been against those D.A.R.E. programs at schools."

- "You know who says terrorism exists? Al-Qaeda."

- "What?!? You hear stupid people?!? That makes you stupid!"

Speak for yourself, buddy...

http://www.mediaite.com/tv/trump-supporter-jeffrey-lord-immediately-responds-to-paul-ryan-by-calling-him-racist/

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Boycotting jukeboxes because of TouchTunes

I love music and enjoy hitting the bar(s) over the weekend, so naturally, when the mood strikes me, I've never been coy about playing some songs on the jukebox. This past Thursday, a friend of mine turned 50, so several friends of her's, including myself, all met up to celebrate the occasion. At around 9:30, a friend of mine and I both chipped in $5 to play some songs on the jukebox. Four hours and 231 skips later, we gave up on hearing the songs we had selected, and went home knowing we had just wasted $5. This wasn't the first time such a thing had happened to me (and many others), and due to that, I'll be boycotting jukeboxes. Why? The scam known as TouchTunes. You see, here's how the plot typically breaks down. A person (or group of people) downloads the TouchTunes app on his/her phone, consumes one too many adult beverages, and due to this, has less care for spending extra money to hear the songs of their choosing right NOW. That's the thing with TouchTun

The difference between "looking" and "checking out"

I may be way off with these numbers, but it's my approximation that at least 75% of individuals whom are involved in a serious relationship feel it's perfectly acceptable to "check out" members of the opposite sex they're not involved with. Meanwhile, approximately 25% either don't feel this is acceptable or aren't sure about the matter. I hadn't thought about this matter for a while, but since I've been dating a woman for about 8 months, the topic has been pondered about some. When reading or hearing others discuss this very issue, I often times hear comments similar to the following: "It's human nature to look." "There's nothing wrong with checking others out. I'm sure he/she does it too!" "It's fine to do it. Just don't tell your boyfriend/girlfriend about it or do it in front of them!" "It's natural to find people attractive." When observing the array of comments, I i

The verdict is in. To no one's surprise, Jonathan Hoenig has been found guilty of being an idiot.

Just recently, when discussing the Michael Brown shooting and whether or not race had anything to do with it, Fox News contributor Jonathan Hoenig said, "You know who talks about race? Racists." One moment while I provide Mr. Hoenig with the well deserved slow-clap. :: slow-claps for two seconds :: So, that was quite the line by Mr. Hoenig, wasn't it? "You know who talks about race? Racists." Well, wasn't he just talking about race? So, by his own words, I guess that makes him a racist. Also, if he wants to be consistent, does this mean that people whom talk about gender are sexists and people whom talk about sexual orientation are homophobes? With that line of thinking, Hoenig would engage in the following back-and-forths: Hoenig: "So, who are you voting for?" A woman: "The Democratic candidate, because he's been adamant about his support for equal rights for women." Hoenig: "You sexist feminist nazi!"