Skip to main content

A high school athlete gets punished for being responsible

From using illegal substances to domestic violence to driving under the influence and beyond, it seems that not a week goes by where I don't hear about or read a story regarding an athlete getting into trouble. Just last night, I read such a story, but this was a much different story - one which greatly bothered me.

Apparently, North Andover (Massachusetts) High School senior volleyball player Erin Cox has just recently been suspended five games and stripped of her captaincy for picking up a friend of her's who was too drunk and taking her home.

When Ms. Cox went to pick up her friend, the police were already on the scene, arresting several people for underage possession of alcohol. Boxford police officer Brian Neeley vouched for Ms. Cox's sobriety, but even that wasn't enough to reverse the school's decision.

Erin's mother - Eleanor Cox - said the following on WBZ-TV in Boston: "She did what she thought was right, and I'm very proud of her."

Attorney Geoffrey Bok, who has been representing the school in court over the matter, responded to the situation by saying this to the Boston Herald: "The school is trying to take a very serious and principled stand regarding alcohol. And we all get that. Teen drinking is a serious problem."

 I find Mr. Bok's quote to be laughable. If the school really wants to take a principled stand on teenage drinking, it shouldn't punish Erin Cox for acting like a responsible adult by picking up a drunk friend and making certain her friend didn't place her own life or others' lives in jeopardy by driving under the influence of alcohol. With the school's ridiculous actions, they only place more of their students at risk of harming or killing themselves or others through drunken driving, because now it's implanted in the students' minds that if you are a friend's designated driver, you will be punished. Erin Cox should be commended, not punished, for what she did. If anyone should be punished in this scenario, it should be the leaders at the school.

http://espn.go.com/boston/story/_/id/9826842/high-school-athlete-massachusetts-suspended-driving-drunk-friend

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Boycotting jukeboxes because of TouchTunes

I love music and enjoy hitting the bar(s) over the weekend, so naturally, when the mood strikes me, I've never been coy about playing some songs on the jukebox. This past Thursday, a friend of mine turned 50, so several friends of her's, including myself, all met up to celebrate the occasion. At around 9:30, a friend of mine and I both chipped in $5 to play some songs on the jukebox. Four hours and 231 skips later, we gave up on hearing the songs we had selected, and went home knowing we had just wasted $5. This wasn't the first time such a thing had happened to me (and many others), and due to that, I'll be boycotting jukeboxes. Why? The scam known as TouchTunes. You see, here's how the plot typically breaks down. A person (or group of people) downloads the TouchTunes app on his/her phone, consumes one too many adult beverages, and due to this, has less care for spending extra money to hear the songs of their choosing right NOW. That's the thing with TouchTun...

Face guarding is legal in college football and the NFL

I just wanted to remind fans and announcers especially, that face guarding is legal in both college football and the NFL. It all comes down to contact. So long as a defender doesn't make contact with an intended receiver, he doesn't have to turn around to play the ball. I can't tell you how many times every week I hear announcers talk about face guarding being a penalty. It's not. I even heard one announcer yesterday state, "If the defender doesn't turn around and play the ball, the ref will call pass interference every time." That's simply not true. Courtesy of referee Bill LeMonnier, he says this with regard to the rule at the college level (answered on 8/12/13): "NCAA rules on pass interference require the face guarding to have contact to be a foul. No contact, no foul by NCAA rules." In the NFL rule book, this is written:  "Actions that constitute defensive pass interference include but are not limited to: (a) Contact by a ...