Skip to main content

ESPN/TMZ trying to stir controversy again

As I predicted earlier today, it sounds as if Philadelphia Eagles starting quarterback Michael Vick will sit in the team's upcoming game against Tampa Bay next Sunday. As I also predicted, sports-writers and analysts have felt the need to debate whether Vick or Nick Foles should be the starting quarterback for the team. What I didn't predict was a headline-grabbing statement made by ESPN's Adam Schefter which would have earned him a low D for honesty, and that's probably being kind.

Just a few minutes ago on Monday Night Countdown, Schefter announced that Foles would be starting for the injured Vick against Tampa Bay this coming Sunday. He then reported that Eagles coach Chip Kelly hasn't decided on who the starter will be beyond that game.

Earlier in the day, ESPN (led by Schefter and Phil Sheridan) reported that Chip Kelly had said this regarding a possible long-term change at quarterback:

"Can [Foles] win the starting job? If Nick goes out there and goes 100 for 100 ... sure."

For Schefter to report that Kelly sarcastically said that if Foles plays the greatest game in history, he has a chance to become the starter, and then later report that the coach has no idea which way he's leaning is dishonest. Come on, ESPN - be better than that. We already have a TMZ and one is already one too many.

http://espn.go.com/nfl/story/_/id/9786120/michael-vick-philadelphia-eagles-likely-tampa-bay-buccaneers
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Boycotting jukeboxes because of TouchTunes

I love music and enjoy hitting the bar(s) over the weekend, so naturally, when the mood strikes me, I've never been coy about playing some songs on the jukebox. This past Thursday, a friend of mine turned 50, so several friends of her's, including myself, all met up to celebrate the occasion. At around 9:30, a friend of mine and I both chipped in $5 to play some songs on the jukebox. Four hours and 231 skips later, we gave up on hearing the songs we had selected, and went home knowing we had just wasted $5. This wasn't the first time such a thing had happened to me (and many others), and due to that, I'll be boycotting jukeboxes. Why? The scam known as TouchTunes. You see, here's how the plot typically breaks down. A person (or group of people) downloads the TouchTunes app on his/her phone, consumes one too many adult beverages, and due to this, has less care for spending extra money to hear the songs of their choosing right NOW. That's the thing with TouchTun
2 comments
Read more

The difference between "looking" and "checking out"

I may be way off with these numbers, but it's my approximation that at least 75% of individuals whom are involved in a serious relationship feel it's perfectly acceptable to "check out" members of the opposite sex they're not involved with. Meanwhile, approximately 25% either don't feel this is acceptable or aren't sure about the matter. I hadn't thought about this matter for a while, but since I've been dating a woman for about 8 months, the topic has been pondered about some. When reading or hearing others discuss this very issue, I often times hear comments similar to the following: "It's human nature to look." "There's nothing wrong with checking others out. I'm sure he/she does it too!" "It's fine to do it. Just don't tell your boyfriend/girlfriend about it or do it in front of them!" "It's natural to find people attractive." When observing the array of comments, I i
Post a Comment
Read more

The verdict is in. To no one's surprise, Jonathan Hoenig has been found guilty of being an idiot.

Just recently, when discussing the Michael Brown shooting and whether or not race had anything to do with it, Fox News contributor Jonathan Hoenig said, "You know who talks about race? Racists." One moment while I provide Mr. Hoenig with the well deserved slow-clap. :: slow-claps for two seconds :: So, that was quite the line by Mr. Hoenig, wasn't it? "You know who talks about race? Racists." Well, wasn't he just talking about race? So, by his own words, I guess that makes him a racist. Also, if he wants to be consistent, does this mean that people whom talk about gender are sexists and people whom talk about sexual orientation are homophobes? With that line of thinking, Hoenig would engage in the following back-and-forths: Hoenig: "So, who are you voting for?" A woman: "The Democratic candidate, because he's been adamant about his support for equal rights for women." Hoenig: "You sexist feminist nazi!"
Post a Comment
Read more