Skip to main content

Vick vs. Foles quarterback controversy

In light of Nick Foles leading the Philadelphia Eagles to a pair of 4th quarter touchdowns in their 36-21 win over the New York Giants on Sunday, it was inevitable that the ever so fickle sports media would jump on that like a rabbit on pretty much anything.

While Vick was spectacular in the team's first two games, he's been rather average in the team's past three. However, at 2-3 and tied atop the NFC East, I still think he gives the team the best chance of making the playoffs this year. Foles is a very capable back-up, but until he develops better intermediate- to long-range passing skills, I have a hard time seeing him as a full-time starter in the league.

Also, Chip Kelly's offense revolves around speed. Vick gives him much more flexibility with the offensive play-calling due to this. The threat of Vick's running opens things up for LeSean McCoy in the backfield - much more so than when Foles is behind center.

The problem with Philadelphia's offense thus far this season is with receivers creating separation and a lack of production inside the red zone. Against the Chiefs, Broncos, and for much of the game against the Giants, Eagles wideouts had trouble getting open for their quarterbacks. Things will need to improve in that area in the weeks to come if the team wants to have more balance and consistency on the offensive side of the ball. Also, the team's lack of size at the skill positions has hampered it inside the red zone at certain points in the young season. Foles' two touchdown passes yesterday came by way of a great catch by Brent Celek and a great adjustment by DeSean Jackson.

Chip Kelly's offense works better with a run-first mentality. For as quickly as the team runs plays, it's beneficial for the clock to continually be running and this happens much more consistently with a run-first than a pass-first mentality. With Michael Vick behind center, the team is much more effective at running the football than with Nick Foles back there. With the read-option plays being called early and often, defenders have to respect Vick as a runner, which leaves bigger holes for McCoy to run through than if Foles were behind center. While Foles would be better suited than Vick for an Andy Reid-style offense, Vick is better suited for this kind of offense. If he's healthy, I think Kelly should stick with Vick as his starter.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Boycotting jukeboxes because of TouchTunes

I love music and enjoy hitting the bar(s) over the weekend, so naturally, when the mood strikes me, I've never been coy about playing some songs on the jukebox. This past Thursday, a friend of mine turned 50, so several friends of her's, including myself, all met up to celebrate the occasion. At around 9:30, a friend of mine and I both chipped in $5 to play some songs on the jukebox. Four hours and 231 skips later, we gave up on hearing the songs we had selected, and went home knowing we had just wasted $5. This wasn't the first time such a thing had happened to me (and many others), and due to that, I'll be boycotting jukeboxes. Why? The scam known as TouchTunes. You see, here's how the plot typically breaks down. A person (or group of people) downloads the TouchTunes app on his/her phone, consumes one too many adult beverages, and due to this, has less care for spending extra money to hear the songs of their choosing right NOW. That's the thing with TouchTun...

Face guarding is legal in college football and the NFL

I just wanted to remind fans and announcers especially, that face guarding is legal in both college football and the NFL. It all comes down to contact. So long as a defender doesn't make contact with an intended receiver, he doesn't have to turn around to play the ball. I can't tell you how many times every week I hear announcers talk about face guarding being a penalty. It's not. I even heard one announcer yesterday state, "If the defender doesn't turn around and play the ball, the ref will call pass interference every time." That's simply not true. Courtesy of referee Bill LeMonnier, he says this with regard to the rule at the college level (answered on 8/12/13): "NCAA rules on pass interference require the face guarding to have contact to be a foul. No contact, no foul by NCAA rules." In the NFL rule book, this is written:  "Actions that constitute defensive pass interference include but are not limited to: (a) Contact by a ...