Skip to main content

Healthcare.gov = Too much traffic = Unpopular (according to Fox News and company)

As many now know, yesterday was the first day people could check out their healthcare options under the Affordable Care Act at healthcare.gov. While there were numerous reports of people experiencing problems on the site, this was largely due to heavy traffic. This will occur on many sites, such as Twitter, on especially busy occasions. So how did some members of the Fox News team and other like-minded individuals take this? Obamacare is unpopular and has failed.

Allow me to explain something to Fox News and company - when people are having trouble logging into a site due to heavy traffic, that means the site has an extremely large number of visitors at that moment. This means the site was quite popular yesterday, glitches and all. 

With this kind of thinking, Fox News would probably think the following:

- "Traffic was bad because of the game? I guess not a lot of people went to the game then, huh? That's disappointing. It really is."

- "You had to wait in line all that time for the new item everyone is talking about? Must not be very popular then. Sales numbers are going to suck."

- "I didn't get in to see my doctor until an hour after it was scheduled! There's just no excuse for that kind of laziness! The place didn't seem very busy. I'm not sure why the room was so full of people, though. They were probably just there to read magazines and watch the soap operas that were playing."
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Boycotting jukeboxes because of TouchTunes

I love music and enjoy hitting the bar(s) over the weekend, so naturally, when the mood strikes me, I've never been coy about playing some songs on the jukebox. This past Thursday, a friend of mine turned 50, so several friends of her's, including myself, all met up to celebrate the occasion. At around 9:30, a friend of mine and I both chipped in $5 to play some songs on the jukebox. Four hours and 231 skips later, we gave up on hearing the songs we had selected, and went home knowing we had just wasted $5. This wasn't the first time such a thing had happened to me (and many others), and due to that, I'll be boycotting jukeboxes. Why? The scam known as TouchTunes. You see, here's how the plot typically breaks down. A person (or group of people) downloads the TouchTunes app on his/her phone, consumes one too many adult beverages, and due to this, has less care for spending extra money to hear the songs of their choosing right NOW. That's the thing with TouchTun
2 comments
Read more

The difference between "looking" and "checking out"

I may be way off with these numbers, but it's my approximation that at least 75% of individuals whom are involved in a serious relationship feel it's perfectly acceptable to "check out" members of the opposite sex they're not involved with. Meanwhile, approximately 25% either don't feel this is acceptable or aren't sure about the matter. I hadn't thought about this matter for a while, but since I've been dating a woman for about 8 months, the topic has been pondered about some. When reading or hearing others discuss this very issue, I often times hear comments similar to the following: "It's human nature to look." "There's nothing wrong with checking others out. I'm sure he/she does it too!" "It's fine to do it. Just don't tell your boyfriend/girlfriend about it or do it in front of them!" "It's natural to find people attractive." When observing the array of comments, I i
Post a Comment
Read more

The verdict is in. To no one's surprise, Jonathan Hoenig has been found guilty of being an idiot.

Just recently, when discussing the Michael Brown shooting and whether or not race had anything to do with it, Fox News contributor Jonathan Hoenig said, "You know who talks about race? Racists." One moment while I provide Mr. Hoenig with the well deserved slow-clap. :: slow-claps for two seconds :: So, that was quite the line by Mr. Hoenig, wasn't it? "You know who talks about race? Racists." Well, wasn't he just talking about race? So, by his own words, I guess that makes him a racist. Also, if he wants to be consistent, does this mean that people whom talk about gender are sexists and people whom talk about sexual orientation are homophobes? With that line of thinking, Hoenig would engage in the following back-and-forths: Hoenig: "So, who are you voting for?" A woman: "The Democratic candidate, because he's been adamant about his support for equal rights for women." Hoenig: "You sexist feminist nazi!"
Post a Comment
Read more