Skip to main content

As Mick Jagger might sing, Thomas Sowell - you can't always get what you want

Conservative columnist Thomas Sowell of the conservative Hoover Institution released an article today titled, "Who shut down the government?" I'm going to focus my attention one what I believe to be the key portion of the article, where Mr. Sowell writes the following:

"Since we cannot read minds, we cannot say who - if anybody - 'wants to shut down the government.' But we do know who had the option to keep the government running and chose not to. The money voted by the House of Representatives covered everything that the government does, except for Obamacare.
The Senate chose not to vote to authorize that money to be spent, because it did not include money for Obamacare. Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid says that he wants a 'clean' bill from the House of Representatives, and some in the media keep repeating the word 'clean' like a mantra. But what is unclean about not giving Harry Reid everything he wants?
If sen. Reid and President Obama refuse to accept the money required to run the government, because it leaves out the money they want to run Obamacare, that is their right. But that is also their responsibility. You cannot blame other people for not giving you everything you want. And it is a fraud to blame them when you refuse to use the money they did vote, even when it is ample to pay for everything else in the government."

Ah, so that's how it works, does it? A law passes both the House and the Senate, gets signed by the president, and upheld by the Supreme Court, but just before near full implementation of the law, House Republicans attempt to partially defund this law by sending such a bill over to the Senate, and since the Senate refused to accept the offer, the shutdown is on them and President Obama, eh? That's interesting.

So, according to Mr. Sowell, if I were to go through all the proper steps of buying a house, where everything was signed for and made official, if the seller then called me and said, "The only way you can still purchase this home is if you give up your car," it would then be my fault if I decided not to go through with it?

Perhaps Mr. Sowell should take his own advice - "You can't always get what you want."

Mr. Sowell, Barack Obama defeated John McCain in the 2008 presidential election. You can't always get what you want.

The healthcare reform bill passed both the House and the Senate before being signed by President Obama himself. You can't always get what you want.

Obama defeated Mitt Romney in the 2012 presidential election. You can't always get what you want.

The bill is law and is to almost be fully implemented as of January 1, 2014. You can't always get what you want.

How about trying to get what you want by making some changes within the Republican Party and through that, appealing to more voters in the coming elections, as opposed to attempting to redefine "losing" by failing during the election cycle and then shutting down the people's voices through the shutting down of the government they voted into office?

http://www.hpe.com/opinion/x559273386/Thomas-Sowell-Who-shut-down-the-government

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Boycotting jukeboxes because of TouchTunes

I love music and enjoy hitting the bar(s) over the weekend, so naturally, when the mood strikes me, I've never been coy about playing some songs on the jukebox. This past Thursday, a friend of mine turned 50, so several friends of her's, including myself, all met up to celebrate the occasion. At around 9:30, a friend of mine and I both chipped in $5 to play some songs on the jukebox. Four hours and 231 skips later, we gave up on hearing the songs we had selected, and went home knowing we had just wasted $5. This wasn't the first time such a thing had happened to me (and many others), and due to that, I'll be boycotting jukeboxes. Why? The scam known as TouchTunes. You see, here's how the plot typically breaks down. A person (or group of people) downloads the TouchTunes app on his/her phone, consumes one too many adult beverages, and due to this, has less care for spending extra money to hear the songs of their choosing right NOW. That's the thing with TouchTun...

Face guarding is legal in college football and the NFL

I just wanted to remind fans and announcers especially, that face guarding is legal in both college football and the NFL. It all comes down to contact. So long as a defender doesn't make contact with an intended receiver, he doesn't have to turn around to play the ball. I can't tell you how many times every week I hear announcers talk about face guarding being a penalty. It's not. I even heard one announcer yesterday state, "If the defender doesn't turn around and play the ball, the ref will call pass interference every time." That's simply not true. Courtesy of referee Bill LeMonnier, he says this with regard to the rule at the college level (answered on 8/12/13): "NCAA rules on pass interference require the face guarding to have contact to be a foul. No contact, no foul by NCAA rules." In the NFL rule book, this is written:  "Actions that constitute defensive pass interference include but are not limited to: (a) Contact by a ...