Skip to main content

Numbers obviously aren't Maine Governor Paul LePage's strong suit

When speaking to a conservative women's group last week in Falmouth, Republican Maine Governor Paul LePage said the following: "About 47 percent of able-bodied people in the state of Maine don't work. About 47 percent. It's really bad."

That is really bad. Do you know what's even worse? Governor LePage's grasp of numbers. Courtesy of Maine's labor department, the Bangor Daily News reported that 65% of able-bodied Mainers are working. The 35% whom aren't working are comprised mainly of retirees, the disabled, homemakers, and students.

The saying goes that "numbers don't lie." However, that's not entirely true. While it may be true that 35% of Mainers aren't currently working, which Republican politicians in the state may use for talking points, that very number and numbers like it are often times used to mislead the public on the whole story. Yes, if a person were to hear that 35% of able-bodied Mainers weren't working, he or she would likely be in shock at first. However, if this person then heard the rest of the story - that the 35% were mostly comprised of retirees, the disabled, homemakers, and students, then they'd likely come away feeling less stunned by the number.

This is what the Republican Party has done time and time again, especially since the 2012 election season when GOP candidate Mitt Romney insinuated that 47% of this country are takers, while 53% are givers. Again, while it may be true that 47% of people don't pay federal income taxes, a large majority of them pay other taxes, such as property and sales.

I especially hear this rhetoric when it comes to food stamps. The GOP has painted food stamp recipients as lazy, unemployed individuals whom steal people's hard-earned tax dollars. They'll then point to a certain percentage of people on food stamps, but will fail to show that a majority of food stamp recipients are elders and children, and that a very large majority of the remaining recipients have jobs.

It seems to me that the GOP's giver-and-taker rhetoric is simply trying to detract the public's attention from the loopholes and breaks the wealthiest of Americans get, as the pay gap between they and the rest of the country continues to expand and middle- and lower-class Americans point their fingers at one another for being allegedly lazy, as opposed to realizing that those catching the biggest breaks of all are the wealthiest among us.

http://thinkprogress.org/politics/2013/10/22/2814211/maine-gov-lepage-47-mainers-work/

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Boycotting jukeboxes because of TouchTunes

I love music and enjoy hitting the bar(s) over the weekend, so naturally, when the mood strikes me, I've never been coy about playing some songs on the jukebox. This past Thursday, a friend of mine turned 50, so several friends of her's, including myself, all met up to celebrate the occasion. At around 9:30, a friend of mine and I both chipped in $5 to play some songs on the jukebox. Four hours and 231 skips later, we gave up on hearing the songs we had selected, and went home knowing we had just wasted $5. This wasn't the first time such a thing had happened to me (and many others), and due to that, I'll be boycotting jukeboxes. Why? The scam known as TouchTunes. You see, here's how the plot typically breaks down. A person (or group of people) downloads the TouchTunes app on his/her phone, consumes one too many adult beverages, and due to this, has less care for spending extra money to hear the songs of their choosing right NOW. That's the thing with TouchTun

The difference between "looking" and "checking out"

I may be way off with these numbers, but it's my approximation that at least 75% of individuals whom are involved in a serious relationship feel it's perfectly acceptable to "check out" members of the opposite sex they're not involved with. Meanwhile, approximately 25% either don't feel this is acceptable or aren't sure about the matter. I hadn't thought about this matter for a while, but since I've been dating a woman for about 8 months, the topic has been pondered about some. When reading or hearing others discuss this very issue, I often times hear comments similar to the following: "It's human nature to look." "There's nothing wrong with checking others out. I'm sure he/she does it too!" "It's fine to do it. Just don't tell your boyfriend/girlfriend about it or do it in front of them!" "It's natural to find people attractive." When observing the array of comments, I i

The verdict is in. To no one's surprise, Jonathan Hoenig has been found guilty of being an idiot.

Just recently, when discussing the Michael Brown shooting and whether or not race had anything to do with it, Fox News contributor Jonathan Hoenig said, "You know who talks about race? Racists." One moment while I provide Mr. Hoenig with the well deserved slow-clap. :: slow-claps for two seconds :: So, that was quite the line by Mr. Hoenig, wasn't it? "You know who talks about race? Racists." Well, wasn't he just talking about race? So, by his own words, I guess that makes him a racist. Also, if he wants to be consistent, does this mean that people whom talk about gender are sexists and people whom talk about sexual orientation are homophobes? With that line of thinking, Hoenig would engage in the following back-and-forths: Hoenig: "So, who are you voting for?" A woman: "The Democratic candidate, because he's been adamant about his support for equal rights for women." Hoenig: "You sexist feminist nazi!"