Skip to main content

Yahoo's Eric Adelson was just waiting for the Philadelphia Eagles offense to fail

Whenever something new gets brought about in any field, it seems that the skeptics are just waiting for that moment it fails. It doesn't matter if the idea, strategy, or product had been successful fourteen consecutive times prior to that very moment, if it fails on attempt #15, the skeptics will shout in unison, "Ah-ha! See? I told you so!"

This seems to be the case with Yahoo sports-writer Eric Adelson, who, in light of the Philadelphia Eagles losing to the Dallas Cowboys 17-3 yesterday, wrote an article, titled, "Chip Kelly's warp speed attack doesn't look so revolutionary anymore in the NFL."

He starts his article with: "So about that Chip Kelly revolution..."

After bashing the Eagles, Adelson then lightens up and says this: "Kelly deserves to bring in more talent and make his way work, but this isn't Oregon anymore." Okay, he didn't lighten up a great deal. The skepticism is still well in tact.

Toward the end of his piece, Adelson says the following: "The past-paced offense needs time to adapt to the NFL, not the other way around."

While I'm sure Adelson enjoyed his Eagles-bashing session, let's get a few things straight here:

1. Before yesterday's game, the Eagles led the league in rushing yards (still do), and were among the league leaders in total yards and points. They've scored 30+ points in four of their seven games this season. They only did that once all of last season, in a 38-33 loss to the Dallas Cowboys.

2. The Eagles finished last year at 4-12. They're 3-4 at this point in the season and would only need to finish the year 2-7 to improve upon last year's record.

3. Philly has been banged up at wide receiver all year, losing starter Jeremy Maclin and others for the year. They're now also banged up at quarterback, with both Michael Vick and Nick Foles sidelined due to injuries.

4. This is Chip Kelly's first year in the NFL. He's made some rookie-like moves to this point in the season, but has been appearing to make some good adjustments. In any case, it's utterly impossible to prove the long-term effectiveness of a new coach's strategy based on a seven-game sample.

5. Believe it or not, but the Eagles are still in the hunt for the NFC East title, just one game back of Dallas, a half a game up on Washington, and two and a half up on the Giants.

There have been some definite bumps in the road for the Eagles offense, and there will continue to be, under first-year head coach Chip Kelly. However, skeptics like Eric Adelson should at least admit that the team's offensive production has vastly improved from last year to this year. In 16 games last season, the team eclipsed 30 points just once. In 7 games this season, its eclipsed that point four times. While doubts are understandable, credit should be given as well.

http://sports.yahoo.com/news/nfl--chip-kelly-s-warp-speed-attack-doesn-t-look-so-revolutionary-anymore-in-the-nfl-231637202.html

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Boycotting jukeboxes because of TouchTunes

I love music and enjoy hitting the bar(s) over the weekend, so naturally, when the mood strikes me, I've never been coy about playing some songs on the jukebox. This past Thursday, a friend of mine turned 50, so several friends of her's, including myself, all met up to celebrate the occasion. At around 9:30, a friend of mine and I both chipped in $5 to play some songs on the jukebox. Four hours and 231 skips later, we gave up on hearing the songs we had selected, and went home knowing we had just wasted $5. This wasn't the first time such a thing had happened to me (and many others), and due to that, I'll be boycotting jukeboxes. Why? The scam known as TouchTunes. You see, here's how the plot typically breaks down. A person (or group of people) downloads the TouchTunes app on his/her phone, consumes one too many adult beverages, and due to this, has less care for spending extra money to hear the songs of their choosing right NOW. That's the thing with TouchTun

The difference between "looking" and "checking out"

I may be way off with these numbers, but it's my approximation that at least 75% of individuals whom are involved in a serious relationship feel it's perfectly acceptable to "check out" members of the opposite sex they're not involved with. Meanwhile, approximately 25% either don't feel this is acceptable or aren't sure about the matter. I hadn't thought about this matter for a while, but since I've been dating a woman for about 8 months, the topic has been pondered about some. When reading or hearing others discuss this very issue, I often times hear comments similar to the following: "It's human nature to look." "There's nothing wrong with checking others out. I'm sure he/she does it too!" "It's fine to do it. Just don't tell your boyfriend/girlfriend about it or do it in front of them!" "It's natural to find people attractive." When observing the array of comments, I i

The verdict is in. To no one's surprise, Jonathan Hoenig has been found guilty of being an idiot.

Just recently, when discussing the Michael Brown shooting and whether or not race had anything to do with it, Fox News contributor Jonathan Hoenig said, "You know who talks about race? Racists." One moment while I provide Mr. Hoenig with the well deserved slow-clap. :: slow-claps for two seconds :: So, that was quite the line by Mr. Hoenig, wasn't it? "You know who talks about race? Racists." Well, wasn't he just talking about race? So, by his own words, I guess that makes him a racist. Also, if he wants to be consistent, does this mean that people whom talk about gender are sexists and people whom talk about sexual orientation are homophobes? With that line of thinking, Hoenig would engage in the following back-and-forths: Hoenig: "So, who are you voting for?" A woman: "The Democratic candidate, because he's been adamant about his support for equal rights for women." Hoenig: "You sexist feminist nazi!"