Skip to main content

Anti-LGBT comments aplenty at the Values Voter Summit

At the Values Voter Summit this past weekend, as has been typical at such events in recent years, several hard-core conservatives decided to make outrageous statements at the expense of the LGBT community. Most of them I had heard before, so I'll focus my attention on the two which stood out from the rest to me.

The first such comment comes courtesy of the Radiance Foundation's Ryan Bomberger, who said that he believes homophobia to be a myth, saying there is no such thing as kleptophobia either.

Right, because those whom don't approve of people with a stealing problem are almost identical to those whom don't approve of equal rights for gay couples. Disapproving of a crime is the same thing as disapproving of homosexuality.

With this kind of twisted logic, Mr. Bomberger may also believe the following:

- "There's no such thing as homophobia. People who don't approve of murderers aren't murderophobics, are they?"

- "There's no such thing as homophobia. I don't approve of rape. Does that make me a rapeophobic?"

- "If there was such a thing as homophobia, there would also be insidertradingophobia, and guess what? There's not!"

My favorite remark comes courtesy of former Arkansas Governor and current Fox News talking head Mike Huckabee, who said that in light of California's new law which protects transgender students, that if the law had been around when he was in high school, all the boys would have pretended to be transgender so they could go into the girls' locker room, closing the tangent with, "Isn't that the craziest thing you've ever heard?"

Uh, yeah, and whose mind came up with that idea? Mike Huckabee. I love those kinds of comments the most. Here we have someone who's so against equal marriage rights for homosexuals and finds the "lifestyle" so disturbing that he resorts to fallacies such as the slippery slope and comes up with a very unrealistic scenario which is far more disturbing than gay marriage or homosexuality in general. Well done, Mr. Huckabee. Well done, indeed.

http://thinkprogress.org/lgbt/2013/10/15/2779641/values-voter-summit-anti-lgbt/

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Boycotting jukeboxes because of TouchTunes

I love music and enjoy hitting the bar(s) over the weekend, so naturally, when the mood strikes me, I've never been coy about playing some songs on the jukebox. This past Thursday, a friend of mine turned 50, so several friends of her's, including myself, all met up to celebrate the occasion. At around 9:30, a friend of mine and I both chipped in $5 to play some songs on the jukebox. Four hours and 231 skips later, we gave up on hearing the songs we had selected, and went home knowing we had just wasted $5. This wasn't the first time such a thing had happened to me (and many others), and due to that, I'll be boycotting jukeboxes. Why? The scam known as TouchTunes. You see, here's how the plot typically breaks down. A person (or group of people) downloads the TouchTunes app on his/her phone, consumes one too many adult beverages, and due to this, has less care for spending extra money to hear the songs of their choosing right NOW. That's the thing with TouchTun

The difference between "looking" and "checking out"

I may be way off with these numbers, but it's my approximation that at least 75% of individuals whom are involved in a serious relationship feel it's perfectly acceptable to "check out" members of the opposite sex they're not involved with. Meanwhile, approximately 25% either don't feel this is acceptable or aren't sure about the matter. I hadn't thought about this matter for a while, but since I've been dating a woman for about 8 months, the topic has been pondered about some. When reading or hearing others discuss this very issue, I often times hear comments similar to the following: "It's human nature to look." "There's nothing wrong with checking others out. I'm sure he/she does it too!" "It's fine to do it. Just don't tell your boyfriend/girlfriend about it or do it in front of them!" "It's natural to find people attractive." When observing the array of comments, I i

The verdict is in. To no one's surprise, Jonathan Hoenig has been found guilty of being an idiot.

Just recently, when discussing the Michael Brown shooting and whether or not race had anything to do with it, Fox News contributor Jonathan Hoenig said, "You know who talks about race? Racists." One moment while I provide Mr. Hoenig with the well deserved slow-clap. :: slow-claps for two seconds :: So, that was quite the line by Mr. Hoenig, wasn't it? "You know who talks about race? Racists." Well, wasn't he just talking about race? So, by his own words, I guess that makes him a racist. Also, if he wants to be consistent, does this mean that people whom talk about gender are sexists and people whom talk about sexual orientation are homophobes? With that line of thinking, Hoenig would engage in the following back-and-forths: Hoenig: "So, who are you voting for?" A woman: "The Democratic candidate, because he's been adamant about his support for equal rights for women." Hoenig: "You sexist feminist nazi!"