Skip to main content

Arrigo Sacchi: "I'm not a racist, but..."

Former Italy soccer coach Arrigo Sacchi has found himself in hot water due to some controversial comments he recently made while speaking at an awards ceremony, where he said following:

"I'm certainly not racist and my history as a coach demonstrates that ... but look at the Viareggio [youth] tournament I would say that there are too many black players. Italy has no dignity, no pride. It should not be possible that our teams should have 15 foreign players in the squad."

After facing the inevitable backlash from his comments, Sacchi attempted to clarify his remarks by speaking to Gazzetta dello Sport and saying this:

"I have been misrepresented, how could I be racist?

I just said I saw a game featuring a team who fielded four coloured boys. My history speaks for itself, I always coached teams with different colours and I bought many, both at Milan and at Madrid.

I just wanted to point out that we are losing our national pride and identity."

I'm not sure which comment was worse, the original or the clarification attempt. What Sacchi essentially stated was this:

Original comment: "I'm certainly not racist, but there are too many black players."

Clarification attempt: "How could I be racist? I just said I saw a game featuring a team who had fielded four coloured boys."

Given the nature of that original comment and the lousy clarification attempt which followed it, expect Arrigo Sacchi to make the following statements and "clarifications" at some point in his life:

Original comment: "I'm certainly not sexist, but there are too many women working nowadays."

Clarification attempt: "How could I be sexist? I just said broads and bitches are making too much money."


Original comment: "I'm certainly not xenophobic, but there are way too many Muslims in the world."

Clarification attempt: "How could I be xenophobic? I just said most Muslims are funny-looking terrorists with names like Abdul Ahmad Rashad Muhammad Allah Qaeda Jazeera."


Original comment: "I'm certainly not homophobic, but gays kind of bother me."

Clarification attempt: "How could I be homophobic? I just said gays are sick, gross, icky, and will be condemned to hell when all is said and done."


Original comment: "I'm certainly not intelligent, but..."

No, no "but" is needed there; I think he got that right...

http://www.theguardian.com/football/2015/feb/17/arrigo-sacchi-no-racist-too-many-blacks-youth-teams

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Boycotting jukeboxes because of TouchTunes

I love music and enjoy hitting the bar(s) over the weekend, so naturally, when the mood strikes me, I've never been coy about playing some songs on the jukebox. This past Thursday, a friend of mine turned 50, so several friends of her's, including myself, all met up to celebrate the occasion. At around 9:30, a friend of mine and I both chipped in $5 to play some songs on the jukebox. Four hours and 231 skips later, we gave up on hearing the songs we had selected, and went home knowing we had just wasted $5. This wasn't the first time such a thing had happened to me (and many others), and due to that, I'll be boycotting jukeboxes. Why? The scam known as TouchTunes. You see, here's how the plot typically breaks down. A person (or group of people) downloads the TouchTunes app on his/her phone, consumes one too many adult beverages, and due to this, has less care for spending extra money to hear the songs of their choosing right NOW. That's the thing with TouchTun...

Face guarding is legal in college football and the NFL

I just wanted to remind fans and announcers especially, that face guarding is legal in both college football and the NFL. It all comes down to contact. So long as a defender doesn't make contact with an intended receiver, he doesn't have to turn around to play the ball. I can't tell you how many times every week I hear announcers talk about face guarding being a penalty. It's not. I even heard one announcer yesterday state, "If the defender doesn't turn around and play the ball, the ref will call pass interference every time." That's simply not true. Courtesy of referee Bill LeMonnier, he says this with regard to the rule at the college level (answered on 8/12/13): "NCAA rules on pass interference require the face guarding to have contact to be a foul. No contact, no foul by NCAA rules." In the NFL rule book, this is written:  "Actions that constitute defensive pass interference include but are not limited to: (a) Contact by a ...