Skip to main content

Genius Ben Carson: "I'm going to compare everything I dislike to the Holocaust or slavery."

I continue to be amazed by how an intelligent former neurosurgeon like Ben Carson can regularly come across as both delusional and moronic. It seems that whenever the GOP candidate gets asked about something he dislikes, he feels the need to compare it to either the Holocaust or slavery.

When he was asked about the Affordable Care Act (Obamacare), what'd he compare it to? Slavery.

When he was asked about gun control, what'd he compare it to? The Holocaust.

Just this past Sunday, when Meet the Press host Chuck Todd asked Carson about abortion, here's what one of the GOP front-runners had to say:

"Think about this. During slavery - and I know that one of those words you're not supposed to say - but I'm saying it. During slavery, a lot of the slave owners thought they had the right to do whatever they wanted to that slave, anything that they chose to do. And what if the abolitionists had said, 'You know, I don't believe in slavery, I think it's wrong. But you guys do whatever you want to do.' Where would we be?"

That's right, Ben Carson compared abortion to slavery. Carson's statement is idiotic on multiple fronts, but especially when it comes to the unintentional irony within it. He more specifically compares women who undergo abortions to slave-owners, because "...they thought they had the right to do whatever they wanted to that slave, anything that they chose to do." Outside of the belief that women shouldn't be told what they can or can't do with their bodies once they become pregnant, what's one of the pro-choice community's most uttered arguments to uphold the Roe v. Wade Supreme Court ruling? That, in the cases of rape, incest, or health issues, women shouldn't be forced to go through with a pregnancy. In other words, some of these "slave-owners," as Ben Carson might refer to them, were violently forced to have sex with men whom impregnated them. Using Carson's analogy, these "slave-owners" only became "slave-owners" by unwillingly being men's "slaves." That'd be like to say an actual slave-owner became that way by being a slave. Yes, twisted logic to say the least.

Ben Carson was right about one thing. When he said, "During slavery - and I know that one of those words you're not supposed to say...," he may want to take his own advice. When one feels the urge to compare something to the Holocaust or slavery, it's best to keep their mouths shut, because whatever they're thinking about saying, it'll make them come across as both delusional and moronic, which is how Ben Carson came across here and at many other points over the course of his campaign.

Since I highly doubt Mr. Carson will heed his own his own advice, expect him to say the following things at some point during primary season:

- "You know, if the Jews didn't have to pay taxes, that Hitler guy would have never had them killed."

- "When I think about atheism and people not following the rules of a sacred book like the Bible, the first word that pops to mind is slavery."

- "When you think about it, Benghazi was a lot like the Holocaust."

- "Slaves didn't own guns, so if you don't own a gun, you're basically a slave."

- "What do Planned Parenthood, slavery, and the Holocaust have in common? Everything!"

http://gawker.com/reasonable-person-ben-carson-compares-women-seeking-abo-1738559113

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Boycotting jukeboxes because of TouchTunes

I love music and enjoy hitting the bar(s) over the weekend, so naturally, when the mood strikes me, I've never been coy about playing some songs on the jukebox. This past Thursday, a friend of mine turned 50, so several friends of her's, including myself, all met up to celebrate the occasion. At around 9:30, a friend of mine and I both chipped in $5 to play some songs on the jukebox. Four hours and 231 skips later, we gave up on hearing the songs we had selected, and went home knowing we had just wasted $5. This wasn't the first time such a thing had happened to me (and many others), and due to that, I'll be boycotting jukeboxes. Why? The scam known as TouchTunes. You see, here's how the plot typically breaks down. A person (or group of people) downloads the TouchTunes app on his/her phone, consumes one too many adult beverages, and due to this, has less care for spending extra money to hear the songs of their choosing right NOW. That's the thing with TouchTun...

Face guarding is legal in college football and the NFL

I just wanted to remind fans and announcers especially, that face guarding is legal in both college football and the NFL. It all comes down to contact. So long as a defender doesn't make contact with an intended receiver, he doesn't have to turn around to play the ball. I can't tell you how many times every week I hear announcers talk about face guarding being a penalty. It's not. I even heard one announcer yesterday state, "If the defender doesn't turn around and play the ball, the ref will call pass interference every time." That's simply not true. Courtesy of referee Bill LeMonnier, he says this with regard to the rule at the college level (answered on 8/12/13): "NCAA rules on pass interference require the face guarding to have contact to be a foul. No contact, no foul by NCAA rules." In the NFL rule book, this is written:  "Actions that constitute defensive pass interference include but are not limited to: (a) Contact by a ...