Skip to main content

Lack of vacation days leads to another government shutdown

Two years after Ted Cruz and the his fellow Republicans shut down the federal government in an attempt to take away millions of people's healthcare and just days following their attempt to shut down the government in an attempt to transform women into stepford wives across the country, Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell announced he and the rest of the GOP will in fact be shutting the government down again, but for a different reason:

"We're old, we're tired, and we need a seriously long vacation. Look, people don't realize how hard it is to work 130 days a year for $174,000, as opposed to 250 days a year for $50,000. We work about 30-35% of the year and, in my opinion, that's 20-25% too much. I can understand why some people might get upset at us for this, like last time, when we cost the country $20 billion or so, but we're not the ones they should be upset about; it's those low-income moochers off the government and the hard-working taxpayers. I mean, these moochers get, on average, $130 a month in food stamps. That's over $1,500 a year! Us in Congress? We make that in about one working day, in the third of the year we actually do work! So, come on, people, who are you going to get mad at, the working poor mooching $1,500 a year off you or Congresspeople, who take over 200 days off work per year, and make that kind of money in a single day on the job? That's what I thought! It's like my buddy Rand Paul once said, 'The harder you work, the more money you make,' and the people in Congress, with our $174,000 salaries, working 130 days a year, are direct proof of that!"

Democratic Massachusetts Senator Elizabeth Warren spoke out loudly against the shutdown, saying, "Those lazy scum-sucking bastards! I'm so angry right now! Who are the biggest moochers? They are! Those motherf**king pieces of sh*t! F**k them!"

Following Senator Warren's tirade, Republican Iowa Representative Steve King had this to say:

"Those words by Senator Warren were uncalled for. I think this shutdown happened because of the profanity she used and God punishing our country as a result. Elizabeth may have said those words after the shutdown started, but whatever... Tomato, potato..."


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Boycotting jukeboxes because of TouchTunes

I love music and enjoy hitting the bar(s) over the weekend, so naturally, when the mood strikes me, I've never been coy about playing some songs on the jukebox. This past Thursday, a friend of mine turned 50, so several friends of her's, including myself, all met up to celebrate the occasion. At around 9:30, a friend of mine and I both chipped in $5 to play some songs on the jukebox. Four hours and 231 skips later, we gave up on hearing the songs we had selected, and went home knowing we had just wasted $5. This wasn't the first time such a thing had happened to me (and many others), and due to that, I'll be boycotting jukeboxes. Why? The scam known as TouchTunes. You see, here's how the plot typically breaks down. A person (or group of people) downloads the TouchTunes app on his/her phone, consumes one too many adult beverages, and due to this, has less care for spending extra money to hear the songs of their choosing right NOW. That's the thing with TouchTun

The difference between "looking" and "checking out"

I may be way off with these numbers, but it's my approximation that at least 75% of individuals whom are involved in a serious relationship feel it's perfectly acceptable to "check out" members of the opposite sex they're not involved with. Meanwhile, approximately 25% either don't feel this is acceptable or aren't sure about the matter. I hadn't thought about this matter for a while, but since I've been dating a woman for about 8 months, the topic has been pondered about some. When reading or hearing others discuss this very issue, I often times hear comments similar to the following: "It's human nature to look." "There's nothing wrong with checking others out. I'm sure he/she does it too!" "It's fine to do it. Just don't tell your boyfriend/girlfriend about it or do it in front of them!" "It's natural to find people attractive." When observing the array of comments, I i

The verdict is in. To no one's surprise, Jonathan Hoenig has been found guilty of being an idiot.

Just recently, when discussing the Michael Brown shooting and whether or not race had anything to do with it, Fox News contributor Jonathan Hoenig said, "You know who talks about race? Racists." One moment while I provide Mr. Hoenig with the well deserved slow-clap. :: slow-claps for two seconds :: So, that was quite the line by Mr. Hoenig, wasn't it? "You know who talks about race? Racists." Well, wasn't he just talking about race? So, by his own words, I guess that makes him a racist. Also, if he wants to be consistent, does this mean that people whom talk about gender are sexists and people whom talk about sexual orientation are homophobes? With that line of thinking, Hoenig would engage in the following back-and-forths: Hoenig: "So, who are you voting for?" A woman: "The Democratic candidate, because he's been adamant about his support for equal rights for women." Hoenig: "You sexist feminist nazi!"