Skip to main content

Lack of vacation days leads to another government shutdown

Two years after Ted Cruz and the his fellow Republicans shut down the federal government in an attempt to take away millions of people's healthcare and just days following their attempt to shut down the government in an attempt to transform women into stepford wives across the country, Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell announced he and the rest of the GOP will in fact be shutting the government down again, but for a different reason:

"We're old, we're tired, and we need a seriously long vacation. Look, people don't realize how hard it is to work 130 days a year for $174,000, as opposed to 250 days a year for $50,000. We work about 30-35% of the year and, in my opinion, that's 20-25% too much. I can understand why some people might get upset at us for this, like last time, when we cost the country $20 billion or so, but we're not the ones they should be upset about; it's those low-income moochers off the government and the hard-working taxpayers. I mean, these moochers get, on average, $130 a month in food stamps. That's over $1,500 a year! Us in Congress? We make that in about one working day, in the third of the year we actually do work! So, come on, people, who are you going to get mad at, the working poor mooching $1,500 a year off you or Congresspeople, who take over 200 days off work per year, and make that kind of money in a single day on the job? That's what I thought! It's like my buddy Rand Paul once said, 'The harder you work, the more money you make,' and the people in Congress, with our $174,000 salaries, working 130 days a year, are direct proof of that!"

Democratic Massachusetts Senator Elizabeth Warren spoke out loudly against the shutdown, saying, "Those lazy scum-sucking bastards! I'm so angry right now! Who are the biggest moochers? They are! Those motherf**king pieces of sh*t! F**k them!"

Following Senator Warren's tirade, Republican Iowa Representative Steve King had this to say:

"Those words by Senator Warren were uncalled for. I think this shutdown happened because of the profanity she used and God punishing our country as a result. Elizabeth may have said those words after the shutdown started, but whatever... Tomato, potato..."


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Boycotting jukeboxes because of TouchTunes

I love music and enjoy hitting the bar(s) over the weekend, so naturally, when the mood strikes me, I've never been coy about playing some songs on the jukebox. This past Thursday, a friend of mine turned 50, so several friends of her's, including myself, all met up to celebrate the occasion. At around 9:30, a friend of mine and I both chipped in $5 to play some songs on the jukebox. Four hours and 231 skips later, we gave up on hearing the songs we had selected, and went home knowing we had just wasted $5. This wasn't the first time such a thing had happened to me (and many others), and due to that, I'll be boycotting jukeboxes. Why? The scam known as TouchTunes. You see, here's how the plot typically breaks down. A person (or group of people) downloads the TouchTunes app on his/her phone, consumes one too many adult beverages, and due to this, has less care for spending extra money to hear the songs of their choosing right NOW. That's the thing with TouchTun...

Face guarding is legal in college football and the NFL

I just wanted to remind fans and announcers especially, that face guarding is legal in both college football and the NFL. It all comes down to contact. So long as a defender doesn't make contact with an intended receiver, he doesn't have to turn around to play the ball. I can't tell you how many times every week I hear announcers talk about face guarding being a penalty. It's not. I even heard one announcer yesterday state, "If the defender doesn't turn around and play the ball, the ref will call pass interference every time." That's simply not true. Courtesy of referee Bill LeMonnier, he says this with regard to the rule at the college level (answered on 8/12/13): "NCAA rules on pass interference require the face guarding to have contact to be a foul. No contact, no foul by NCAA rules." In the NFL rule book, this is written:  "Actions that constitute defensive pass interference include but are not limited to: (a) Contact by a ...