Skip to main content

If they win the election, the GOP promises a permanent government shutdown

While it's quite common for presidential nominees to make promises to their constituents about what they'll do if elected to office, the Republican Party has decided to go a different route. In a statement released by the Republican National Committee (RNC) yesterday, the party promised that, if their nominee is elected president, they'll permanently shut down the federal government.

In the statement, RNC Chairman Reince Priebus said this:

"If we win the next election, it's going to be a historic victory. Why is this you might ask? What is it Democrats always tell people? 'We're going to try to get things done to improve people's lives and in essence prove the government can be the source for some good and blah blah blah,' right? What is it us Republicans always say? 'Government can't be trusted; it's evil; it's pretty much worthless,' right? Yet when Republicans get elected to office, they still try to get things done on occasion, and if you really think about it, that's not consistent with our ideals. So, if the GOP nominee gets elected this coming election, our promise to the American people is this: we will permanently shut down the federal government. Our stance has been that the government sucks and is good for nothing, so if you elect our candidate, we're going to prove that to you by permanently shutting this whole operation down. Sure, Democrats want to show you what we can do as a government to make your lives better, but Republicans want to show you what we can't do to make your lives worse. What do you really want, America? Hope that things can get better, only for there to be a chance those dreams will be destroyed right before your very eyes, or to be told life sucks, and for that fate to be all but inevitable? Vote for us, America, and we'll prove to you the government is worthless, because we'll be the ones running it! God bless you and God bless the greatest country in the history of the world, the United States of America!"

Democratic National Committee chair Debbie Wasserman Schultz has since responded to the RNC's statement, saying, "Thanks, Reince; I couldn't have said it better myself!"

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Boycotting jukeboxes because of TouchTunes

I love music and enjoy hitting the bar(s) over the weekend, so naturally, when the mood strikes me, I've never been coy about playing some songs on the jukebox. This past Thursday, a friend of mine turned 50, so several friends of her's, including myself, all met up to celebrate the occasion. At around 9:30, a friend of mine and I both chipped in $5 to play some songs on the jukebox. Four hours and 231 skips later, we gave up on hearing the songs we had selected, and went home knowing we had just wasted $5. This wasn't the first time such a thing had happened to me (and many others), and due to that, I'll be boycotting jukeboxes. Why? The scam known as TouchTunes. You see, here's how the plot typically breaks down. A person (or group of people) downloads the TouchTunes app on his/her phone, consumes one too many adult beverages, and due to this, has less care for spending extra money to hear the songs of their choosing right NOW. That's the thing with TouchTun

The difference between "looking" and "checking out"

I may be way off with these numbers, but it's my approximation that at least 75% of individuals whom are involved in a serious relationship feel it's perfectly acceptable to "check out" members of the opposite sex they're not involved with. Meanwhile, approximately 25% either don't feel this is acceptable or aren't sure about the matter. I hadn't thought about this matter for a while, but since I've been dating a woman for about 8 months, the topic has been pondered about some. When reading or hearing others discuss this very issue, I often times hear comments similar to the following: "It's human nature to look." "There's nothing wrong with checking others out. I'm sure he/she does it too!" "It's fine to do it. Just don't tell your boyfriend/girlfriend about it or do it in front of them!" "It's natural to find people attractive." When observing the array of comments, I i

The verdict is in. To no one's surprise, Jonathan Hoenig has been found guilty of being an idiot.

Just recently, when discussing the Michael Brown shooting and whether or not race had anything to do with it, Fox News contributor Jonathan Hoenig said, "You know who talks about race? Racists." One moment while I provide Mr. Hoenig with the well deserved slow-clap. :: slow-claps for two seconds :: So, that was quite the line by Mr. Hoenig, wasn't it? "You know who talks about race? Racists." Well, wasn't he just talking about race? So, by his own words, I guess that makes him a racist. Also, if he wants to be consistent, does this mean that people whom talk about gender are sexists and people whom talk about sexual orientation are homophobes? With that line of thinking, Hoenig would engage in the following back-and-forths: Hoenig: "So, who are you voting for?" A woman: "The Democratic candidate, because he's been adamant about his support for equal rights for women." Hoenig: "You sexist feminist nazi!"