Skip to main content

Math Professor Jason Chaffetz

It's largely known Utah Representative Jason Chaffetz has a way with numbers, and due to that, has decided to take the next step forward and become a college math professor.

Earlier this year, Representative Chaffetz blew the minds of many when he lectured Planned Parenthood foes and supporters on the family planning organization's services, providing a chart which showcased that, while cancer screening & prevention services have decreased over the past 7 years, abortion procedures have increased in that same time-frame, and due to that, the 327,000 abortions Planned Parenthood was responsible for in 2013 was greater than the 935,573 cancer screening & prevention services the organization provided in that same year.

Given that, the Utah Representative was kind enough to send me a copy of his first class lecture, which will go as follows: 

"For our first class, I'm going to talk to you about numbers, but not just any numbers; I'm going to talk to you about special numbers, big numbers, small numbers, all kinds of numbers. I especially want to talk to you about comparing numbers. Is 1,000,000 less than 7? Is it greater than 7? Is it equal to 7? Keeping that in mind, Benghazi. To the best of my knowledge, 0 Americans were killed in Benghazi attacks in the year 2011, but sadly, 4 were killed there in 2012. So, in other words, we saw a huge increase in American deaths in Benghazi between those two years. When it comes to gun violence, it was reported that, in 2009, 31,593 people died of gun violence, but that number went down to 31,347 in 2009. Here's the chart showing what I just told you. As you can see, before 2012, that number in Benghazi was 0, but it shot up to 4 in 2012. But deaths via gun violence went down from 2009-2010, which means there were fewer gun-related deaths in 2010 than there were Benghazi-related deaths in 2012, because 31,347 is less than 4. Are there any questions?"

After reading the lecture, I called Representative Chaffetz and asked him, "If the math from your lecture is correct, is the narrator from the Flonase commercial incorrect when he says, '6 is greater than 1'?" In response, the Utah Representative said, "Well, what's the chart say?" Flonase has since decided to alter its tagline to, "6 is greater than 1, unless you're Jason Chaffetz!"

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Boycotting jukeboxes because of TouchTunes

I love music and enjoy hitting the bar(s) over the weekend, so naturally, when the mood strikes me, I've never been coy about playing some songs on the jukebox. This past Thursday, a friend of mine turned 50, so several friends of her's, including myself, all met up to celebrate the occasion. At around 9:30, a friend of mine and I both chipped in $5 to play some songs on the jukebox. Four hours and 231 skips later, we gave up on hearing the songs we had selected, and went home knowing we had just wasted $5. This wasn't the first time such a thing had happened to me (and many others), and due to that, I'll be boycotting jukeboxes. Why? The scam known as TouchTunes. You see, here's how the plot typically breaks down. A person (or group of people) downloads the TouchTunes app on his/her phone, consumes one too many adult beverages, and due to this, has less care for spending extra money to hear the songs of their choosing right NOW. That's the thing with TouchTun

The difference between "looking" and "checking out"

I may be way off with these numbers, but it's my approximation that at least 75% of individuals whom are involved in a serious relationship feel it's perfectly acceptable to "check out" members of the opposite sex they're not involved with. Meanwhile, approximately 25% either don't feel this is acceptable or aren't sure about the matter. I hadn't thought about this matter for a while, but since I've been dating a woman for about 8 months, the topic has been pondered about some. When reading or hearing others discuss this very issue, I often times hear comments similar to the following: "It's human nature to look." "There's nothing wrong with checking others out. I'm sure he/she does it too!" "It's fine to do it. Just don't tell your boyfriend/girlfriend about it or do it in front of them!" "It's natural to find people attractive." When observing the array of comments, I i

The verdict is in. To no one's surprise, Jonathan Hoenig has been found guilty of being an idiot.

Just recently, when discussing the Michael Brown shooting and whether or not race had anything to do with it, Fox News contributor Jonathan Hoenig said, "You know who talks about race? Racists." One moment while I provide Mr. Hoenig with the well deserved slow-clap. :: slow-claps for two seconds :: So, that was quite the line by Mr. Hoenig, wasn't it? "You know who talks about race? Racists." Well, wasn't he just talking about race? So, by his own words, I guess that makes him a racist. Also, if he wants to be consistent, does this mean that people whom talk about gender are sexists and people whom talk about sexual orientation are homophobes? With that line of thinking, Hoenig would engage in the following back-and-forths: Hoenig: "So, who are you voting for?" A woman: "The Democratic candidate, because he's been adamant about his support for equal rights for women." Hoenig: "You sexist feminist nazi!"