Skip to main content

Bowl game disappointment

Of all sports, I'd have to say that college football is my favorite, with curling being a close second. Having said that, though, I've been rather disappointed with the bowl games this year. Of the 33 bowl games, 10 have been decided by one possession. Of the 9 games that have been played since New Year's Day, only 2 have been decided by one possession. Baylor and UCLA had all the makings of a fun shootout in the Holiday Bowl, but while Baylor kept up their part of the deal, UCLA laid an egg in a 49-26 blowout by the Bears over the Bruins. Speaking of eggs, that's what West Virginia laid against Syracuse in their 38-14 loss in the Pinstripe Bowl. The typically pesky Air Force Falcons got pummeled by Rice 33-14. USC forgot to show up against Georgia Tech in their 21-7 loss to the Yellow Jackets in the Sun Bowl. Purdue had no business being in a New Year's Day bowl game, but still, they should have put up a better fight than they did, losing 58-14 to then 7-5 Oklahoma State. Northern Illinois didn't appear to belong in a BCS bowl game and got clobbered in the 2nd half by Florida State, losing 31-10 to the Seminoles. Louisville looked fully interested and motivated to play in the Sugar Bowl, but their opponent - the Florida Gators - didn't look like they really wanted to be there and it showed, in the Cardinals' 33-23 win over the heavily favored Gators. The Fiesta Bowl became less and less interesting as the game progressed, with Oregon beating Kansas State 35-17. Then in a Big XII rematch, Texas A&M dominated Oklahoma 41-13 in the Cotton Bowl. I hate to sound like a pessimist, but it wouldn't surprise me to see Alabama beat Notre Dame by at least a couple scores in tomorrow night's national championship game. With a couple exceptions, there haven't been too many great finishes in the bowl games so far. For whatever reason, it's felt as if the games this year have just generated less excitement than in previous years, for me at least. Perhaps it's the fact there are 35 bowl games and even a 6-7 team was rewarded this year with a bowl bid (Georgia Tech). Perhaps it's the seemingly constant changing bowl names, some which are comical (the Idaho Potato Bowl? Really?). Perhaps it's the extraordinarily long layoff for some teams, which makes them more prone to showing rust, especially in the first half of these bowl games. Whatever it is, I can't wait for the playoff to start, and hopefully the expansion of it.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Boycotting jukeboxes because of TouchTunes

I love music and enjoy hitting the bar(s) over the weekend, so naturally, when the mood strikes me, I've never been coy about playing some songs on the jukebox. This past Thursday, a friend of mine turned 50, so several friends of her's, including myself, all met up to celebrate the occasion. At around 9:30, a friend of mine and I both chipped in $5 to play some songs on the jukebox. Four hours and 231 skips later, we gave up on hearing the songs we had selected, and went home knowing we had just wasted $5. This wasn't the first time such a thing had happened to me (and many others), and due to that, I'll be boycotting jukeboxes. Why? The scam known as TouchTunes. You see, here's how the plot typically breaks down. A person (or group of people) downloads the TouchTunes app on his/her phone, consumes one too many adult beverages, and due to this, has less care for spending extra money to hear the songs of their choosing right NOW. That's the thing with TouchTun

The difference between "looking" and "checking out"

I may be way off with these numbers, but it's my approximation that at least 75% of individuals whom are involved in a serious relationship feel it's perfectly acceptable to "check out" members of the opposite sex they're not involved with. Meanwhile, approximately 25% either don't feel this is acceptable or aren't sure about the matter. I hadn't thought about this matter for a while, but since I've been dating a woman for about 8 months, the topic has been pondered about some. When reading or hearing others discuss this very issue, I often times hear comments similar to the following: "It's human nature to look." "There's nothing wrong with checking others out. I'm sure he/she does it too!" "It's fine to do it. Just don't tell your boyfriend/girlfriend about it or do it in front of them!" "It's natural to find people attractive." When observing the array of comments, I i

The verdict is in. To no one's surprise, Jonathan Hoenig has been found guilty of being an idiot.

Just recently, when discussing the Michael Brown shooting and whether or not race had anything to do with it, Fox News contributor Jonathan Hoenig said, "You know who talks about race? Racists." One moment while I provide Mr. Hoenig with the well deserved slow-clap. :: slow-claps for two seconds :: So, that was quite the line by Mr. Hoenig, wasn't it? "You know who talks about race? Racists." Well, wasn't he just talking about race? So, by his own words, I guess that makes him a racist. Also, if he wants to be consistent, does this mean that people whom talk about gender are sexists and people whom talk about sexual orientation are homophobes? With that line of thinking, Hoenig would engage in the following back-and-forths: Hoenig: "So, who are you voting for?" A woman: "The Democratic candidate, because he's been adamant about his support for equal rights for women." Hoenig: "You sexist feminist nazi!"