Skip to main content

Right-leaning Heritage Foundation's Economic Freedom Index appears to like universal healthcare

Remember how many big-name Republicans went after Obamacare, saying it was trampling on our freedoms and the first step toward socialism?

Even former Senator and current president of the right-wing Heritage Foundation - Jim DeMint - referred to Obamacare as "a cancer" and said that it "is fundamentally inconsistent with liberty."

I only mention DeMint specifically because of the recently released 2013 Heritage Economic Freedom Index, where the conservative-leaning group ranks countries based on their level of freedom from an economic standpoint.

Number 10 on the list of most free countries, according to the Heritage Foundation, is the United States. This is both surprising and unsurprising. It's surprising, given the fact that the liberty-trampling Obamacare (according to many conservatives) looks like it's here to stay. However, many of these same conservatives who decry Obamacare for that alleged reason also lay claim that the U.S. is the freest, greatest country in the history of the world or something to that effect. However great the contradiction, the U.S. snuck into the top ten in this list.

Who else made the top ten? I'm glad I asked. Counting down from the number 9 to number 1 spots, the nine other countries making the top ten of the Heritage Foundation's Economic Freedom Index are: Denmark, Mauritius, Chile, Canada, Switzerland, New Zealand, Australia, Singapore, and Hong Kong.

How many of these countries have some type of universal healthcare? Oh, all of them. In fact, the majority of these countries, even post-Obamacare, have a more expansive healthcare system than the United States. So, how is it that Obamacare is such an intrusion on our liberties, yet we're still ranked 10th according to this conservative group on our level of economic freedom, and the nine countries in front of us in that department have just as expansive if not a more expansive healthcare system than we do? So, yeah, how does that work exactly?

It would have been one thing for the Heritage Foundation to have ranked the United States down a ways on their list of economic freedom and countries whom possess universal healthcare systems were ranked down with them. This would have shown consistency between their talking points and what they actually believe. However, after hearing their extremely critical words of Obamacare and reading the right-wing Heritage Foundation's Economic Freedom Index, I'm hard-pressed to find that consistency and with that, am finding it difficult to make any sense of the matter. The only possible reason I can come up with is that these conservatives truly do believe, even while possessing some semblance of universal healthcare, the likes of: Hong Kong, Singapore, Australia, New Zealand, Switzerland, Canada, Chile, Mauritius, Denmark, and the United States are the freest countries in the world, but they also know how to rile their base by bashing Obamacare and presenting it as the monster that it isn't, as the right-leaning Heritage Foundation's freedom index showcases.

http://thinkprogress.org/health/2013/01/11/1429241/conservative-think-tank-ranks-government-run-health-care-as-compatible-with-freedom/

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Boycotting jukeboxes because of TouchTunes

I love music and enjoy hitting the bar(s) over the weekend, so naturally, when the mood strikes me, I've never been coy about playing some songs on the jukebox. This past Thursday, a friend of mine turned 50, so several friends of her's, including myself, all met up to celebrate the occasion. At around 9:30, a friend of mine and I both chipped in $5 to play some songs on the jukebox. Four hours and 231 skips later, we gave up on hearing the songs we had selected, and went home knowing we had just wasted $5. This wasn't the first time such a thing had happened to me (and many others), and due to that, I'll be boycotting jukeboxes. Why? The scam known as TouchTunes. You see, here's how the plot typically breaks down. A person (or group of people) downloads the TouchTunes app on his/her phone, consumes one too many adult beverages, and due to this, has less care for spending extra money to hear the songs of their choosing right NOW. That's the thing with TouchTun

The difference between "looking" and "checking out"

I may be way off with these numbers, but it's my approximation that at least 75% of individuals whom are involved in a serious relationship feel it's perfectly acceptable to "check out" members of the opposite sex they're not involved with. Meanwhile, approximately 25% either don't feel this is acceptable or aren't sure about the matter. I hadn't thought about this matter for a while, but since I've been dating a woman for about 8 months, the topic has been pondered about some. When reading or hearing others discuss this very issue, I often times hear comments similar to the following: "It's human nature to look." "There's nothing wrong with checking others out. I'm sure he/she does it too!" "It's fine to do it. Just don't tell your boyfriend/girlfriend about it or do it in front of them!" "It's natural to find people attractive." When observing the array of comments, I i

The verdict is in. To no one's surprise, Jonathan Hoenig has been found guilty of being an idiot.

Just recently, when discussing the Michael Brown shooting and whether or not race had anything to do with it, Fox News contributor Jonathan Hoenig said, "You know who talks about race? Racists." One moment while I provide Mr. Hoenig with the well deserved slow-clap. :: slow-claps for two seconds :: So, that was quite the line by Mr. Hoenig, wasn't it? "You know who talks about race? Racists." Well, wasn't he just talking about race? So, by his own words, I guess that makes him a racist. Also, if he wants to be consistent, does this mean that people whom talk about gender are sexists and people whom talk about sexual orientation are homophobes? With that line of thinking, Hoenig would engage in the following back-and-forths: Hoenig: "So, who are you voting for?" A woman: "The Democratic candidate, because he's been adamant about his support for equal rights for women." Hoenig: "You sexist feminist nazi!"