Skip to main content

Utah man + rifle + pistol + JC Penney's = ?

In light of all the gun-control talk, about a week ago, a 22-year old man by the name of  Joseph Kelley decided he'd be doing the country a favor if he strapped an unloaded rifle onto his back and brought along a loaded Glock pistol for good measure to a JC Penney's store in Utah.

Kelley was trying to make the point that weapons aren't dangerous when handled by good, law-abiding citizens such as himself.

Kelley obviously isn't the brightest crayon in the box - not even a dark gray. It's quite something for a person to hear about the tragedy in Newtown, Connecticut, see the terror in the children's, parents', and teachers' eyes, to hear talk about the government potentially passing stricter gun laws, and to one morning decide, "You know what I'm going to do? I'm going to bring a rifle and a pistol into a JC Penney's store, where parents and their children will be shopping, and won't strike fear into anyone, because people should know just by looking at me - a regular guy with a rifle strapped his back as he walks into a retail store - that I'm a good person. I'm doing this in the name of the U.S. Constitution, in the name of the 2nd Amendment, and in the name of stupidity and insanity! Fear not, kids and their mothers! I am here to protect you."

With that kind of rationale, I can just see the following story not long after a town was traumatized by a number of their citizens getting raped by a deranged man:

::man walks into a Target completely naked, with a condom on his johnson::

Local newsperson Josanna Nosource: "Why on earth did you do this, sir?"

Donald Chubby: "I just wanted to prove to everyone that not all people with penises are dangerous when they're handled by good, law-abiding citizens such as myself. I even brought protection, in case the moment struck another person and myself. It is kind of cold in here, though, so I'd need some help with that."

Yeah, I'm sure both of these guys and their "guns" frightened some, traumatized others, and provided multiple people with new reality television show ideas. Stay tuned...

http://thinkprogress.org/justice/2013/01/19/1472811/jc-penney-guns/

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Boycotting jukeboxes because of TouchTunes

I love music and enjoy hitting the bar(s) over the weekend, so naturally, when the mood strikes me, I've never been coy about playing some songs on the jukebox. This past Thursday, a friend of mine turned 50, so several friends of her's, including myself, all met up to celebrate the occasion. At around 9:30, a friend of mine and I both chipped in $5 to play some songs on the jukebox. Four hours and 231 skips later, we gave up on hearing the songs we had selected, and went home knowing we had just wasted $5. This wasn't the first time such a thing had happened to me (and many others), and due to that, I'll be boycotting jukeboxes. Why? The scam known as TouchTunes. You see, here's how the plot typically breaks down. A person (or group of people) downloads the TouchTunes app on his/her phone, consumes one too many adult beverages, and due to this, has less care for spending extra money to hear the songs of their choosing right NOW. That's the thing with TouchTun

The difference between "looking" and "checking out"

I may be way off with these numbers, but it's my approximation that at least 75% of individuals whom are involved in a serious relationship feel it's perfectly acceptable to "check out" members of the opposite sex they're not involved with. Meanwhile, approximately 25% either don't feel this is acceptable or aren't sure about the matter. I hadn't thought about this matter for a while, but since I've been dating a woman for about 8 months, the topic has been pondered about some. When reading or hearing others discuss this very issue, I often times hear comments similar to the following: "It's human nature to look." "There's nothing wrong with checking others out. I'm sure he/she does it too!" "It's fine to do it. Just don't tell your boyfriend/girlfriend about it or do it in front of them!" "It's natural to find people attractive." When observing the array of comments, I i

The verdict is in. To no one's surprise, Jonathan Hoenig has been found guilty of being an idiot.

Just recently, when discussing the Michael Brown shooting and whether or not race had anything to do with it, Fox News contributor Jonathan Hoenig said, "You know who talks about race? Racists." One moment while I provide Mr. Hoenig with the well deserved slow-clap. :: slow-claps for two seconds :: So, that was quite the line by Mr. Hoenig, wasn't it? "You know who talks about race? Racists." Well, wasn't he just talking about race? So, by his own words, I guess that makes him a racist. Also, if he wants to be consistent, does this mean that people whom talk about gender are sexists and people whom talk about sexual orientation are homophobes? With that line of thinking, Hoenig would engage in the following back-and-forths: Hoenig: "So, who are you voting for?" A woman: "The Democratic candidate, because he's been adamant about his support for equal rights for women." Hoenig: "You sexist feminist nazi!"