Skip to main content

Let's hold off on passing judgment of Manti Te'o

Word has just broke that the story concerning Notre Dame Heisman-trophy finalist Manti Te'o's girlfriend's death was a hoax. As reported by Deadspin, there was no documentation of one Lennay Kekua dying or ever even existing. The two supposedly met via Twitter and engaged in an online relationship for about a year. What appears to have happened is one of two things - either a person (or group of people) played a hoax on Te'o for whatever sick reason, or Te'o was part of the hoax, in an attempt to garner favorable publicity.

I'm now seeing this story pop up just about everywhere. I've seen it mentioned 3+ times on Facebook already just amongst my group of friends. When searching "Manti Te'o" and "hoax" on Google, 116,000 results now show. It seems as if a majority of people believe Te'o knew about the hoax and was in on it. The reasoning? "He had to have known about it. How could anyone be so naive?"

I think we should hold off before casting judgment on Te'o. Is it possible he knew about the hoax and was in on it? Yes. However, we don't have all the facts before us yet and haven't heard Te'o himself respond to all the questions surrounding this breaking news. If it is true that Te'o knew about the hoax and lied to the country about it for the duration of last season, that would be incredibly sad and disappointing. However, I don't think we can ignore the possibility that he perhaps didn't know about the hoax, and the media (and people in general) should hold off on demonizing the guy before we know the full truth.

Is it possible for someone to be "naive" like that? Yes, it is. Let's just look at this story. Let's just assume for a second that Te'o wasn't aware of the hoax and was rather naive about the situation; he wouldn't be the only one who was naive regarding this story. What about the media? The people at home? Especially the media? Where was the investigative journalism? Why are we only finding out now - on January 16th of 2013 - after the college football season, that the story we heard about all season regarding Manti Te'o and the death of his girlfriend was a hoax? If Te'o was naive regarding this hoax and not in on it himself, the media would only be projecting to say that the Notre Dame linebacker was too naive. The fact of the matter would be that the media would have eaten up the story just as Te'o, and many people at home did. The media wanted to believe the story. It was a great, powerful, and inspirational story. They wanted it to be true. The people at home love powerful stories, so we too were inspired by it. In this possible scenario, Te'o too wanted to believe the story himself. If it comes to light that he was the victim of a hoax, I hope that others whom ate up the story along side Te'o don't cast judgment on him, especially the media. It's one thing for Te'o to believe the story himself and quite another for the media to report it to the homes of everyone in this country. I personally hope that for his sake, Te'o was the victim of this atrocious act. However, I will wait until all the facts are released and he answers questions before deciding whether or not I feel he was complicit in the act. I hope others, especially in the media, follow suit.

http://www.usatoday.com/story/sports/ncaaf/2013/01/16/manti-teo-girlfriend-hoax-deadspin/1840415/

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Boycotting jukeboxes because of TouchTunes

I love music and enjoy hitting the bar(s) over the weekend, so naturally, when the mood strikes me, I've never been coy about playing some songs on the jukebox. This past Thursday, a friend of mine turned 50, so several friends of her's, including myself, all met up to celebrate the occasion. At around 9:30, a friend of mine and I both chipped in $5 to play some songs on the jukebox. Four hours and 231 skips later, we gave up on hearing the songs we had selected, and went home knowing we had just wasted $5. This wasn't the first time such a thing had happened to me (and many others), and due to that, I'll be boycotting jukeboxes. Why? The scam known as TouchTunes. You see, here's how the plot typically breaks down. A person (or group of people) downloads the TouchTunes app on his/her phone, consumes one too many adult beverages, and due to this, has less care for spending extra money to hear the songs of their choosing right NOW. That's the thing with TouchTun

The difference between "looking" and "checking out"

I may be way off with these numbers, but it's my approximation that at least 75% of individuals whom are involved in a serious relationship feel it's perfectly acceptable to "check out" members of the opposite sex they're not involved with. Meanwhile, approximately 25% either don't feel this is acceptable or aren't sure about the matter. I hadn't thought about this matter for a while, but since I've been dating a woman for about 8 months, the topic has been pondered about some. When reading or hearing others discuss this very issue, I often times hear comments similar to the following: "It's human nature to look." "There's nothing wrong with checking others out. I'm sure he/she does it too!" "It's fine to do it. Just don't tell your boyfriend/girlfriend about it or do it in front of them!" "It's natural to find people attractive." When observing the array of comments, I i

The verdict is in. To no one's surprise, Jonathan Hoenig has been found guilty of being an idiot.

Just recently, when discussing the Michael Brown shooting and whether or not race had anything to do with it, Fox News contributor Jonathan Hoenig said, "You know who talks about race? Racists." One moment while I provide Mr. Hoenig with the well deserved slow-clap. :: slow-claps for two seconds :: So, that was quite the line by Mr. Hoenig, wasn't it? "You know who talks about race? Racists." Well, wasn't he just talking about race? So, by his own words, I guess that makes him a racist. Also, if he wants to be consistent, does this mean that people whom talk about gender are sexists and people whom talk about sexual orientation are homophobes? With that line of thinking, Hoenig would engage in the following back-and-forths: Hoenig: "So, who are you voting for?" A woman: "The Democratic candidate, because he's been adamant about his support for equal rights for women." Hoenig: "You sexist feminist nazi!"