Skip to main content

The Republican Party - the party of symbols and slogans

I've been both flustered and fascinated by this. Why is it that it seems symbols and bumper-sticker slogans hold such greater value to conservative Republicans than to liberal Democrats? Why do they spend so much time caring that a symbol of a cross be displayed in as many places as possible? That they sport an American flag on a shirt or other articles of clothing? That drivers know via a sticker they support the troops, believe in freedom, and love God? I've never understood this and with every election that passes, it appears to be occurring with more frequency as the Republican Party moves further and further to the right.

To outsiders, the American flag is just a piece of cloth, which showcases stars and stripes and the colors red, white, and blue. To Americans, this piece of cloth holds greater significance than to the outsiders. However, I often times wonder how many people whom sport the flag so frequently on clothing and the like actually think about why they are doing so. It's felt as if the flag has been a symbol, a code word for "freedom," without thinking about what it actually took to attain said liberties. In actuality, it's just a piece of cloth, unless it truly means something to an individual, and I often times wonder if many people whom plaster the flag all over themselves so frequently do so simply because they've been told it's patriotic, as opposed to it actually meaning something to them personally. The more one tries to outwardly prove something to others, the more I have to wonder if it's all for show. Wrapping oneself in a flag doesn't make a person patriotic. Yelling to the world that one is patriotic doesn't make it so. One has to prove this through actions backing up said words, and it takes far more than dressing like a symbolic piece of cloth to do this.

With the cross - again, to outsiders, it's just a piece of wood. To Christians, it holds far greater significance than that. But why do so many focus their attention on this symbol being displayed ubiquitously? If a person wears a cross around his or her neck, does this mean he or she is a Christian? No, not necessarily. If a person has crosses spread all about his or her home, does this mean the person is a Christian? No. Again, people can yell that they're a Christian on national television and can live in a house they shaped as a cross, but unless their actions back up these words and symbols, they're pretty meaningless.

It's nice to say we support the troops through bumper stickers, but what are we actually doing for the troops to show we support them? It doesn't mean much to a soldier fighting overseas to protect our freedoms that a person driving a Ford Taurus in Topeka, Kansas has a sticker placed on the back bumper of his or her car which says, "I support our troops."

So why has it felt like the Republican Party has become more and more taken by symbols and slogans through the years? Why has it become of greater importance to tell people they're patriotic, Christian, and that they support the troops than to actually illustrate this? Words and symbols hold very little value on their own unless there is meaning and substance behind them. I wish more people would understand that. The words "I love you," no matter how much a husband relays those three words unto his wife, mean absolutely nothing if he beats, lies to, or cheats on her. The words "I love this country," "I am a proud Christian," and "I support the troops" mean little to nothing unless they are backed by action.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Boycotting jukeboxes because of TouchTunes

I love music and enjoy hitting the bar(s) over the weekend, so naturally, when the mood strikes me, I've never been coy about playing some songs on the jukebox. This past Thursday, a friend of mine turned 50, so several friends of her's, including myself, all met up to celebrate the occasion. At around 9:30, a friend of mine and I both chipped in $5 to play some songs on the jukebox. Four hours and 231 skips later, we gave up on hearing the songs we had selected, and went home knowing we had just wasted $5. This wasn't the first time such a thing had happened to me (and many others), and due to that, I'll be boycotting jukeboxes. Why? The scam known as TouchTunes. You see, here's how the plot typically breaks down. A person (or group of people) downloads the TouchTunes app on his/her phone, consumes one too many adult beverages, and due to this, has less care for spending extra money to hear the songs of their choosing right NOW. That's the thing with TouchTun...

Mentioned on Crooks and Liars and Hinterland Gazette!

Due to some tweets of mine, I got mentioned on the following two sites (all my tweets can be viewed here -  https://twitter.com/CraigRozniecki ): https://crooksandliars.com/2019/04/trump-gives-stupid-advice-george https://hinterlandgazette.com/2019/03/istandwithschiff-is-trending-after-donald-trump-led-gop-attack-on-adam-schiff-backfires-spectacularly.html

Face guarding is legal in college football and the NFL

I just wanted to remind fans and announcers especially, that face guarding is legal in both college football and the NFL. It all comes down to contact. So long as a defender doesn't make contact with an intended receiver, he doesn't have to turn around to play the ball. I can't tell you how many times every week I hear announcers talk about face guarding being a penalty. It's not. I even heard one announcer yesterday state, "If the defender doesn't turn around and play the ball, the ref will call pass interference every time." That's simply not true. Courtesy of referee Bill LeMonnier, he says this with regard to the rule at the college level (answered on 8/12/13): "NCAA rules on pass interference require the face guarding to have contact to be a foul. No contact, no foul by NCAA rules." In the NFL rule book, this is written:  "Actions that constitute defensive pass interference include but are not limited to: (a) Contact by a ...