Skip to main content

Comparing the 2008 and 2012 presidential elections

We're exactly two months past the presidential election and all the votes have finally been tallied. Here's a rundown of the results, both from 2008 and 2012, with the differences between the two elections in parentheses.

Overall '08
Obama: 66,882,230 (53%)
McCain: 58,343,671 (46%)
Difference: Obama +8,538,559

Overall '12
Obama: 65,899,557 (51%) (-982,673)
Romney: 60,931,949 (47%) (+2,588,278)
Difference: Obama +4,967,608 (-3,570,951)


AL '08
Obama: 813,479 (39%)
McCain: 1,266,546 (61%)
Difference: Obama -453,067

AL '12
Obama: 795,696 (38%)  (-17,783)
Romney: 1,255,925 (61%) (-10,621)
Difference: Obama -460,229 (-7,162)


AK '08
Obama: 123,594 (38%)
McCain: 193,841 (60%)
Difference: Obama -70,247

AK '12
Obama: 122,640 (41%) (-954)
Romney: 164,676 (55%) (-29,165)
Difference: Obama -42,036 (+28,211)


AZ '08
Obama: 1,034,707 (45%)
McCain: 1,230,111 (54%)
Difference: Obama -195,404

AZ '12
Obama: 1,025,232 (45%) (-9,475)
Romney: 1,233,654 (54%) (+3,543)
Difference: Obama -208,422 (-13,018)


AR '08
Obama: 422,310 (39%)
McCain: 638,017 (59%)
Difference: Obama -215,707

AR '12
Obama: 394,409 (37%) (-27,901)
Romney: 647,744 (61%) (+9,727)
Difference: Obama -253,335 (-37,628)


CA '08
Obama: 8,274,473 (61%)
McCain: 5,011,781 (37%)
Difference: Obama +3,262,692

CA '12
Obama: 7,854,285 (60%) (-420,188)
Romney: 4,839,958 (37%) (-171,823)
Difference: Obama +3,014,327 (-248,365)

CO '08
Obama: 1,288,576 (54%)
McCain: 1,073,589 (46%)
Difference: Obama +214,987

CO '12
Obama: 1,322,998 (51%) (+34,422)
Romney: 1,185,050 (46%) (+111,461)
Difference: Obama +137,948 (-77,039)


CT '08
Obama: 997,772 (61%)
McCain: 629,428 (38%)
Difference: Obama +368,344

CT '12
Obama: 905,083 (58%) (-92,689)
Romney: 634,892 (41%) (+5,464)
Difference: Obama: +270,191 (-98,153)


DE '08
Obama: 255,459 (62%)
McCain: 152,374 (37%)
Difference: Obama +103,085

DE '12
Obama: 242,584 (59%) (-12,875)
Romney: 165,484 (40%) (+13,110)
Difference: Obama +77,100 (-25,985)


DC '08
Obama: 245,800 (93%)
McCain: 17,357 (7%)
Difference: Obama +228,443

DC '12
Obama: 267,070 (91%) (+21,270)
Romney: 21,381 (7%) (+4,024)
Difference: Obama +245,689 (+17,246)


FL '08
Obama: 4,282,074 (51%)
McCain: 4,045,624 (48%)
Difference: Obama +236,450

FL '12
Obama: 4,237,756 (50%) (-44,318)
Romney: 4,163,447 (49%) (+117,823)
Difference: Obama +74,309 (-162,141)


GA '08
Obama: 1,844,123 (47%)
McCain: 2,048,759 (52%)
Difference: Obama -204,636

GA '12
Obama: 1,773,827 (45%) (-70,296)
Romney: 2,078,688 (53%) (+29,929)
Difference: Obama -304,861 (-100,225)


HI '08
Obama: 325,871 (72%)
McCain: 120,566 (27%)
Difference: Obama +205,305

HI '12
Obama: 306,658 (71%) (-19,213)
Romney: 121,015 (28%) (+449)
Difference: Obama +185,643 (-19,662)


ID '08
Obama: 236,440 (36%)
McCain: 403,012 (61%)
Difference: Obama -166,572

ID '12
Obama: 212,787 (33%) (-23,653)
Romney: 420,911 (65%) (+17,899)
Difference: Obama -208,124 (-41,552)


IL '08
Obama: 3,419,673 (62%)
McCain: 2,031,627 (37%)
Difference: Obama +1,388,046

IL '12
Obama: 3,019,512 (58%) (-400,161)
Romney: 2,135,216 (41%) (+103,589)
Difference: Obama +884,296 (-503,750)


IN '08
Obama: 1,374,039 (50%)
McCain: 1,345,648 (49%)
Difference: Obama +28,391

IN '12
Obama: 1,152,887 (44%) (-221,152)
Romney: 1,420,543 (54%) (+74,895)
Difference: Obama -267,656 (-296,047)


IA '08
Obama: 828,940 (54%)
McCain: 682,379 (45%)
Difference: Obama +146,561

IA '12
Obama: 822,544 (52%) (-6,396)
Romney: 730,617 (46%) (+48,238)
Difference: Obama +91,927 (-54,634)


KS '08
Obama: 514,765 (42%)
McCain: 699,655 (57%)
Difference: Obama -184,890

KS '12
Obama: 440,726 (38%) (-74,039)
Romney: 692,634 (60%) (-7,021)
Difference: Obama -251,908 (-67,018)


KY '08
Obama: 751,985 (41%)
McCain: 1,048,462 (58%)
Difference: Obama -296,477

KY '12
Obama: 679,370 (38%) (-72,615)
Romney: 1,087,190 (60%) (+38,728)
Difference: Obama -407,820 (-111,343)


LA '08
Obama: 782,989 (40%)
McCain: 1,148,275 (59%)
Difference: Obama -365,286

LA '12
Obama: 809,141 (41%) (+26,152)
Romney: 1,152,262 (58%) (+3,987)
Difference: Obama -343,121 (+22,165)


ME '08
Obama: 421,923 (58%)
McCain: 295,273 (40%)
Difference: Obama +126,650

ME '12
Obama: 401,306 (56%) (-20,617)
Romney: 292,276 (41%) (-2,997)
Difference: Obama +109,030 (-17,620)


MD '08
Obama: 1,629,467 (62%)
McCain: 959,862 (37%)
Difference: Obama +669,605

MD '12
Obama: 1,677,844 (62%) (+48,377)
Romney: 971,869 (36%) (+12,007)
Difference: Obama +705,975 (+36,370)


MA '08
Obama: 1,904,097 (62%)
McCain: 1,108,854 (36%)
Difference: Obama +795,243

MA '12
Obama: 1,921,290 (61%) (+17,193)
Romney: 1,188,314 (38%) (+79,460)
Difference: Obama +732,976 (-62,267)


MI '08
Obama: 2,872,579 (57%)
McCain: 2,048,639 (41%)
Difference: Obama +823,940

MI '12
Obama: 2,564,569 (54%) (-308,010)
Romney: 2,115,256 (45%) (+66,617)
Difference: Obama +449,313 (-374,627)


MN '08
Obama: 1,573,354 (54%)
McCain: 1,275,409 (44%)
Difference: Obama +297,945

MN '12
Obama: 1,546,167 (53%) (-27,187)
Romney: 1,320,225 (45%) (+44,816)
Difference: Obama +225,942 (-72,003)


MS '08
Obama: 554,662 (43%)
McCain: 724,597 (56%)
Difference: Obama -169,935

MS '12
Obama: 562,949 (44%) (+8,287)
Romney: 710,746 (55%) (-13,851)
Difference: Obama -147,797 (+22,138)


MO '08
Obama: 1,441,911 (49%)
McCain: 1,445,814 (50%)
Difference: Obama -3,903

MO '12
Obama: 1,223,796 (44%) (-218,115)
Romney: 1,482,440 (54%) (+36,626)
Difference: Obama -258,644 (-254,741)


NE '08
Obama: 333,319 (42%)
McCain: 452,979 (57%)
Difference: Obama -119,660

NE '12
Obama: 302,081 (38%) (-31,238)
Romney: 475,064 (60%) (+22,085)
Difference: Obama -172,983 (-53,323)


NV '08
Obama: 533,736 (55%)
McCain: 412,827 (43%)
Difference: Obama +120,909

NV '12
Obama: 531,373 (52%) (-2,363)
Romney: 463,567 (46%) (+50,740)
Difference: Obama +67,806 (-53,103)


NH '08
Obama: 384,826 (54%)
McCain: 316,534 (45%)
Difference: Obama +68,292

NH '12
Obama: 369,561 (52%) (-15,265)
Romney: 329,918 (46%) (+13,384)
Difference: Obama +39,643 (-28,649)


NJ '08
Obama: 2,215,422 (57%)
McCain: 1,613,207 (42%)
Difference: Obama +602,215

NJ '12
Obama: 2,122,786 (58%) (-92,636)
Romney: 1,478,088 (41%) (-135,119)
Difference: Obama +644,698 (+42,483)


NM '08
Obama: 472,422 (57%)
McCain: 356,832 (42%)
Difference: Obama +115,590

NM '12
Obama: 415,335 (53%) (-57,087)
Romney: 335,788 (43%) (-21,044)
Difference: Obama +79,547 (-36,043)


NY '08
Obama: 4,804,701 (63%)
McCain: 2,752,728 (36%)
Difference: Obama +2,051,973

NY '12
Obama: 4,471,871 (63%) (-332,830)
Romney: 2,485,432 (35%) (-267,296)
Difference: Obama +1,986,439 (-65,534)


NC '08
Obama: 2,142,651 (50%)
McCain: 2,128,474 (49%)
Difference: Obama +14,177

NC '12
Obama: 2,178,391 (48%) (+35,740)
Romney: 2,270,395 (50) (+141,921)
Difference: Obama -92,004 (-106,181)


ND '08
Obama: 141,278 (45%)
McCain: 168,601 (53%)
Difference: Obama -27,323

ND '12
Obama: 124,966 (39%) (-16,312)
Romney: 188,320 (58%) (+19,719)
Difference: Obama -63,354 (-36,031)


OH '08
Obama: 2,933,388 (52%)
McCain: 2,674,491 (47%)
Difference: Obama +258,897

OH '12
Obama: 2,827,621 (51%) (-105,767)
Romney: 2,661,407 (48%) (-16,084)
Difference: Obama +166,214 (-92,683)


OK '08
Obama: 502,496 (34%)
McCain: 960,165 (66%)
Difference: Obama -457,669

OK '12
Obama: 443,547 (33%) (-58,949)
Romney: 891,325 (67%) (-68,840)
Difference: Obama -447,778 (+9,891)


OR '08
Obama: 1,037,291 (57%)
McCain: 738,475 (41%)
Difference: Obama +298,816

OR '12
Obama: 970,488 (54%) (-66,803)
Romney: 754,175 (42%) (+15,700)
Difference: Obama +216,313 (-82,503)


PA '08
Obama: 3,276,363 (55%)
McCain: 2,655,885 (44%)
Difference: Obama +620,478

PA '12
Obama: 2,990,274 (52%) (-286,089)
Romney: 2,680,434 (47%) (+24,549)
Difference: Obama +309,840 (-310,638)


RI '08
Obama: 296,571 (63%)
McCain: 165,391 (35%)
Difference: Obama +131,180

RI '12
Obama: 279,677 (63%) (-16,894)
Romney: 157,204 (35%) (-8,187)
Difference: Obama +122,473 (-8,707)


SC '08
Obama: 862,449 (45%)
McCain: 1,034,896 (54%)
Difference: Obama -172,447

SC '12
Obama: 865,941 (44%) (+3,492)
Romney: 1,071,645 (55%) (+36,749)
Difference: Obama -205,704 (-33,257)


SD '08
Obama: 170,924 (45%)
McCain: 203,054 (53%)
Difference: Obama - 32,130

SD '12
Obama: 145,039 (40%) (-25,885)
Romney: 210,610 (58%) (+7,556)
Difference: Obama -65,571 (-33,441)


TN '08
Obama: 1,087,437 (42%)
McCain: 1,479,178 (57%)
Difference: Obama -391,741

TN '12
Obama: 960,709 (39%) (-126,728)
Romney: 1,462,330 (59%) (-16,848)
Difference: Obama -501,621 (-109,880)


TX '08
Obama: 3,528,633 (44%)
McCain: 4,479,328 (55%)
Difference: Obama -950,695

TX '12
Obama: 3,308,124 (41%) (-220,509)
Romney: 4,569,843 (57%) (+90,515)
Difference: Obama -1,261,719 (-311,024)


UT '08
Obama: 327,670 (34%)
McCain: 596,030 (63%)
Difference: Obama -268,360

UT '12
Obama: 251,813 (25%) (-75,857)
Romney: 740,600 (73%) (+144,570)
Difference: Obama -488,787 (-220,427)


VT '08
Obama: 219,262 (68%)
McCain: 98,974 (31%)
Difference: Obama +120,288

VT '12
Obama: 199,239 (67%) (-20,023)
Romney: 92,698 (31%) (-6,276)
Difference: Obama +106,541 (-13,747)


VA '08
Obama: 1,959,532 (53%)
McCain: 1,725,005 (47%)
Difference: Obama +234,527

VA '12
Obama: 1,971,820 (51%) (+12,288)
Romney: 1,822,522 (47%) (+97,517)
Difference: Obama +149,298 (-85,229)


WA '08
Obama: 1,750,848 (58%)
McCain: 1,229,216 (41%)
Difference: Obama +521,632

WA '12
Obama: 1,755,396 (56%) (+4,548)
Romney: 1,290,670 (41%) (+61,454)
Difference: Obama +464,726 (-56,906)


WV '08
Obama: 303,857 (43%)
McCain: 397,466 (56%)
Difference: Obama -93,609

WV '12
Obama: 238,269 (36%) (-65,588)
Romney: 417,655 (62%) (+20,189)
Difference: Obama -179,386 (-85,777)


WI '08
Obama: 1,677,211 (56%)
McCain: 1,262,393 (43%)
Difference: Obama +414,818

WI '12
Obama: 1,620,985 (53%) (-56,226)
Romney: 1,410,966 (46%) (+148,573)
Difference: Obama +210,019 (-204,799)


WY '08
Obama: 82,868 (33%)
McCain: 164,958 (65%)
Difference: Obama -82,090

WY '12
Obama: 69,286 (28%) (-13,582)
McCain: 170,962 (69%) (+6,004)
Difference: Obama -101,676 (-19,586)

I'm a numbers guys (and geography), so I find this kind of thing to be interesting. In an election year when the incumbent president still sees unemployment numbers near 8.0%, the economy gradually pulling out of a recession but not as quickly as some would like, and an opposition party that seems to despise the president with every fiber of their being, in most election years, the odds would have been against Barack Obama from winning a second term. As could be expected, he lost many votes from 2008 to 2012, but not enough to lose the race. In fact, while Romney garnered about 2.5 million more votes than did John McCain in the 2008 election, the guy earned fewer votes than McCain in thirteen states: Alabama, Alaska, California, Kansas, Maine, Mississippi, New Mexico, New York, Ohio, Oklahoma, Rhode Island, Tennessee, and Vermont. Obama, meanwhile, actually picked up more votes than he had in 2008 in nine states (including D.C.): Louisiana, Maryland, Massachusetts, Mississippi, North Carolina, South Carolina, Virginia, Washington, and also the District of Columbia. Obama fared better in terms of overall difference in seven states (including D.C.): Alaska, Louisiana, Maryland, Mississippi, New Jersey, Oklahoma, and D.C. It'll be interesting to see if either party is able to start making trends of some of these numbers, like Obama in the state of Alaska. We'll also have to see if North Carolina continues to be a battleground state, but lean slightly red or if the Democrats can truly make it a toss-up state every four years. Will they finally start being more competitive in Arizona, and possibly in Georgia? For the Republican Party, was 2012 an aberration with regard to making such a big dent in the Democratic advantage in Pennsylvania or will it go on to become more of a toss-up state in the years to come? Will they be able to make Minnesota and Michigan more competitive in the years to come? Take control of Virginia following two consecutive losses there? Make Wisconsin a true toss-up state? It'll be interesting to discover the answers to these very questions and others in the years to come. Fortunately, we won't have to go through this whole spiel for another four years. No matter how much I like or dislike a certain candidate, I really have no need to hear them approve their own message fifteen times a day.

http://www.cnn.com/ELECTION/2008/results/president/

https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/lv?key=0AjYj9mXElO_QdHpla01oWE1jOFZRbnhJZkZpVFNKeVE&toomany=true#gid=19

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Boycotting jukeboxes because of TouchTunes

I love music and enjoy hitting the bar(s) over the weekend, so naturally, when the mood strikes me, I've never been coy about playing some songs on the jukebox. This past Thursday, a friend of mine turned 50, so several friends of her's, including myself, all met up to celebrate the occasion. At around 9:30, a friend of mine and I both chipped in $5 to play some songs on the jukebox. Four hours and 231 skips later, we gave up on hearing the songs we had selected, and went home knowing we had just wasted $5. This wasn't the first time such a thing had happened to me (and many others), and due to that, I'll be boycotting jukeboxes. Why? The scam known as TouchTunes. You see, here's how the plot typically breaks down. A person (or group of people) downloads the TouchTunes app on his/her phone, consumes one too many adult beverages, and due to this, has less care for spending extra money to hear the songs of their choosing right NOW. That's the thing with TouchTun

The difference between "looking" and "checking out"

I may be way off with these numbers, but it's my approximation that at least 75% of individuals whom are involved in a serious relationship feel it's perfectly acceptable to "check out" members of the opposite sex they're not involved with. Meanwhile, approximately 25% either don't feel this is acceptable or aren't sure about the matter. I hadn't thought about this matter for a while, but since I've been dating a woman for about 8 months, the topic has been pondered about some. When reading or hearing others discuss this very issue, I often times hear comments similar to the following: "It's human nature to look." "There's nothing wrong with checking others out. I'm sure he/she does it too!" "It's fine to do it. Just don't tell your boyfriend/girlfriend about it or do it in front of them!" "It's natural to find people attractive." When observing the array of comments, I i

The verdict is in. To no one's surprise, Jonathan Hoenig has been found guilty of being an idiot.

Just recently, when discussing the Michael Brown shooting and whether or not race had anything to do with it, Fox News contributor Jonathan Hoenig said, "You know who talks about race? Racists." One moment while I provide Mr. Hoenig with the well deserved slow-clap. :: slow-claps for two seconds :: So, that was quite the line by Mr. Hoenig, wasn't it? "You know who talks about race? Racists." Well, wasn't he just talking about race? So, by his own words, I guess that makes him a racist. Also, if he wants to be consistent, does this mean that people whom talk about gender are sexists and people whom talk about sexual orientation are homophobes? With that line of thinking, Hoenig would engage in the following back-and-forths: Hoenig: "So, who are you voting for?" A woman: "The Democratic candidate, because he's been adamant about his support for equal rights for women." Hoenig: "You sexist feminist nazi!"