Skip to main content

Victimless crime?

I've been hearing and reading some sportswriters, analysts, and even comedians lay claim that the Manti Te'o case fits the bill of a victimless crime.

Assuming for a moment that Te'o only briefly lied about his girlfriend at the Heisman Trophy ceremony because he was embarrassed by his findings two days earlier when receiving a strange phone call from the woman who had pretended to be his girlfriend and who he was told had died of leukemia two months earlier, how would this be a victimless crime?

This college kid thought he had found a special connection with a woman online. They supposedly spent a lot of time communicating, opened up about having feelings for one another, etc. Not long after he was informed of his grandmother dying, he was told that this girlfriend of his had perished from leukemia. Two people he felt extremely close to, to his knowledge, died within a week of each other. Two months later, he received a phone call from the woman who had allegedly died of leukemia. He was then to appear on national television two days later with regard to being a finalist for the Heisman Trophy. Not until now are all the details starting to be released about the whole ordeal.

A person pranked his/her way to getting close with Te'o, prompting him to develop feelings for "her," only to be heartbroken about news of her demise via leukemia, and to find out a couple months later it was all a lie. Think about how stunned, confused, and emotionally torn apart this 21-year old kid was following all of these events. Who knows how long these events will linger in the mind, heart, and psyche of Te'o - if he'll be able to trust another again, form a tight-knit bond with a person, etc. Given all of that, how in the world was Te'o not a victim?

Also, to a lesser extent, I have to imagine the woman whose photos the main hoaxer used to pursue Te'o has to feel slightly used and victimized as well. The hoaxer was not given permission to use the photos and this woman now finds out that they were used to lie to a famous football player - to reel him into having feelings for her, only to be told that she died of leukemia, before finding out about the hoax a couple months later.

I can even think of a third victim - the American people, whom had to experience the incompetence of ESPN and the rest of the sports media, in reporting this hoax through the duration of the college football season, being told of the story like it was fact, when it obviously wasn't.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Boycotting jukeboxes because of TouchTunes

I love music and enjoy hitting the bar(s) over the weekend, so naturally, when the mood strikes me, I've never been coy about playing some songs on the jukebox. This past Thursday, a friend of mine turned 50, so several friends of her's, including myself, all met up to celebrate the occasion. At around 9:30, a friend of mine and I both chipped in $5 to play some songs on the jukebox. Four hours and 231 skips later, we gave up on hearing the songs we had selected, and went home knowing we had just wasted $5. This wasn't the first time such a thing had happened to me (and many others), and due to that, I'll be boycotting jukeboxes. Why? The scam known as TouchTunes. You see, here's how the plot typically breaks down. A person (or group of people) downloads the TouchTunes app on his/her phone, consumes one too many adult beverages, and due to this, has less care for spending extra money to hear the songs of their choosing right NOW. That's the thing with TouchTun

The difference between "looking" and "checking out"

I may be way off with these numbers, but it's my approximation that at least 75% of individuals whom are involved in a serious relationship feel it's perfectly acceptable to "check out" members of the opposite sex they're not involved with. Meanwhile, approximately 25% either don't feel this is acceptable or aren't sure about the matter. I hadn't thought about this matter for a while, but since I've been dating a woman for about 8 months, the topic has been pondered about some. When reading or hearing others discuss this very issue, I often times hear comments similar to the following: "It's human nature to look." "There's nothing wrong with checking others out. I'm sure he/she does it too!" "It's fine to do it. Just don't tell your boyfriend/girlfriend about it or do it in front of them!" "It's natural to find people attractive." When observing the array of comments, I i

The verdict is in. To no one's surprise, Jonathan Hoenig has been found guilty of being an idiot.

Just recently, when discussing the Michael Brown shooting and whether or not race had anything to do with it, Fox News contributor Jonathan Hoenig said, "You know who talks about race? Racists." One moment while I provide Mr. Hoenig with the well deserved slow-clap. :: slow-claps for two seconds :: So, that was quite the line by Mr. Hoenig, wasn't it? "You know who talks about race? Racists." Well, wasn't he just talking about race? So, by his own words, I guess that makes him a racist. Also, if he wants to be consistent, does this mean that people whom talk about gender are sexists and people whom talk about sexual orientation are homophobes? With that line of thinking, Hoenig would engage in the following back-and-forths: Hoenig: "So, who are you voting for?" A woman: "The Democratic candidate, because he's been adamant about his support for equal rights for women." Hoenig: "You sexist feminist nazi!"