Skip to main content

Another illogical pro-gun Facebook meme

It's just another day, and I see another pro-gun Facebook meme being posted which has failed-in-Critical-Thinking-class written all over it (figuratively speaking, of course).

The meme says the following:

"When there's a bombing, 
we blame the BOMBER.

When there's a drunk-driving accident,
we blame the DRIVER.

Why, when there's a shooting,
do we blame the GUN?"

Both of these comparisons fail miserably. First off, creating a bomb is illegal. Wonder why Congress doesn't push for more bomb-control legislation? Because there isn't a need for any, since making bombs is illegal. It is legal for most people of a certain age to purchase and own a gun. This is why some members of Congress have pushed for stricter gun-control laws. This lack of logic brings back memories of my Critical Thinking professor, where he would blurt out, "Fail!" at such a lousy comparison.

With regard to driving, like with purchasing a gun, it is legal for most people of a certain age. However, there are more obstacles to get through when it comes to legally being able to drive an automobile than to own a firearm, in a majority of states anyhow. Drivers are required to have X hours of training, to pass a visual, written, and driver's test, and then to get their license renewed every four years and possibly go through the same process again if they've had any troubles on the road. Whether there's an accident or not, though, driving under the influence of alcohol is illegal. There are laws in place to prevent people from driving while intoxicated. These laws could be referred to as drunk-driving-control laws. In other words, they're already in place, as opposed to stricter gun-control legislation, so once again, this comparison fails on multiple levels.

Also, I think many far-right gun enthusiasts fail to see the two essential components to scenarios like the three I mentioned before. 

It's not just the bomber's fault or the bomb's fault. Without a bomb, there would be no bomber.

It's not just the driver's fault or the alcohol's fault. Without the alcohol, there would be no drunk-driver.

It's not just the shooter's fault or the gun's fault. Without the firearm, there would be no shooter.

Yeah, like with other such memes before it, this one has failed-in-Critical-Thinking-class written all over it...

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Boycotting jukeboxes because of TouchTunes

I love music and enjoy hitting the bar(s) over the weekend, so naturally, when the mood strikes me, I've never been coy about playing some songs on the jukebox. This past Thursday, a friend of mine turned 50, so several friends of her's, including myself, all met up to celebrate the occasion. At around 9:30, a friend of mine and I both chipped in $5 to play some songs on the jukebox. Four hours and 231 skips later, we gave up on hearing the songs we had selected, and went home knowing we had just wasted $5. This wasn't the first time such a thing had happened to me (and many others), and due to that, I'll be boycotting jukeboxes. Why? The scam known as TouchTunes. You see, here's how the plot typically breaks down. A person (or group of people) downloads the TouchTunes app on his/her phone, consumes one too many adult beverages, and due to this, has less care for spending extra money to hear the songs of their choosing right NOW. That's the thing with TouchTun...

Face guarding is legal in college football and the NFL

I just wanted to remind fans and announcers especially, that face guarding is legal in both college football and the NFL. It all comes down to contact. So long as a defender doesn't make contact with an intended receiver, he doesn't have to turn around to play the ball. I can't tell you how many times every week I hear announcers talk about face guarding being a penalty. It's not. I even heard one announcer yesterday state, "If the defender doesn't turn around and play the ball, the ref will call pass interference every time." That's simply not true. Courtesy of referee Bill LeMonnier, he says this with regard to the rule at the college level (answered on 8/12/13): "NCAA rules on pass interference require the face guarding to have contact to be a foul. No contact, no foul by NCAA rules." In the NFL rule book, this is written:  "Actions that constitute defensive pass interference include but are not limited to: (a) Contact by a ...