Skip to main content

Who's to blame for the rise of the Tea Party? Just ask an Ohio Republican...

I read a letter-to-the-editor in the Columbus Dispatch today which really made me wonder at what point in the denial process are many Republicans. The title of the writing was, "Don't blame the GOP for the Tea Party," and the one paragraph which stood out from the rest was the final one in the piece, where this was written:

"Those who criticize the tea party must realize that this group came to legitimacy in 2010 only as an opposite and equal reaction to Democratic leadership’s decision to demagogue, demonize and dictate rather than cooperate with moderates of all stripes in thoughtfully addressing our ever-growing list of national challenges.

BOB BARTHOLOMEW

Hilliard"

Mr. Bartholomew is absolutely right. This is why Tea Partiers are sending their own candidates to challenge traditional Republicans in primaries, because the reason for their existence is due to the Democrats and their agenda. It's also why even some traditional Republicans have admitted that the party is at war with itself between traditional conservatives and Tea Partiers - because of the darn Democrats!

In all seriousness, Mr. Bartholomew is right about one thing, which is that the Tea Party does appear to be the polar opposite of the Democrat Party. Obamacare has proven this to a T. While the Tea Party doesn't want the government to function, which their shutdown illustrated, the Democrat Party wants the government to function and help better the lives of people. So, congratulations, Mr. Bartholomew, for allowing your party to move so far to the right that a separate party was created in an attempt to combat "moderate" Republicans in Congress and replace them with candidates so far to the right, they make Rush Limbaugh not need Viagra anymore. Also, congratulations on believing it's the Democrats whom are to blame for this, because they want a functioning government, and lord help us, according to Tea Partiers, our Founding Fathers never wanted such a thing. Excuse me for a moment while I attempt to live in a similar la-la land as yourself, but only in my neverneverland, Fox News and right-wing talk radio don't exist.

http://www.dispatch.com/content/stories/editorials/2013/12/03/1-bartholomew-sat-gk1ps2m7-10.html

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Boycotting jukeboxes because of TouchTunes

I love music and enjoy hitting the bar(s) over the weekend, so naturally, when the mood strikes me, I've never been coy about playing some songs on the jukebox. This past Thursday, a friend of mine turned 50, so several friends of her's, including myself, all met up to celebrate the occasion. At around 9:30, a friend of mine and I both chipped in $5 to play some songs on the jukebox. Four hours and 231 skips later, we gave up on hearing the songs we had selected, and went home knowing we had just wasted $5. This wasn't the first time such a thing had happened to me (and many others), and due to that, I'll be boycotting jukeboxes. Why? The scam known as TouchTunes. You see, here's how the plot typically breaks down. A person (or group of people) downloads the TouchTunes app on his/her phone, consumes one too many adult beverages, and due to this, has less care for spending extra money to hear the songs of their choosing right NOW. That's the thing with TouchTun...

Face guarding is legal in college football and the NFL

I just wanted to remind fans and announcers especially, that face guarding is legal in both college football and the NFL. It all comes down to contact. So long as a defender doesn't make contact with an intended receiver, he doesn't have to turn around to play the ball. I can't tell you how many times every week I hear announcers talk about face guarding being a penalty. It's not. I even heard one announcer yesterday state, "If the defender doesn't turn around and play the ball, the ref will call pass interference every time." That's simply not true. Courtesy of referee Bill LeMonnier, he says this with regard to the rule at the college level (answered on 8/12/13): "NCAA rules on pass interference require the face guarding to have contact to be a foul. No contact, no foul by NCAA rules." In the NFL rule book, this is written:  "Actions that constitute defensive pass interference include but are not limited to: (a) Contact by a ...