Skip to main content

GOP: "Too many regulations in West Virginia!"

As many have heard by now, there was a very unfortunate chemical spill in West Virginia last week, which has left more than 300,000 people without safe water. They've been unable to drink water, shower with it, brush their teeth with it, use it for anything except flush the toilet.

Due to a lack of such regulations in the Mountaineer state, the Elk River storage facility hadn't been inspected since 1991 - a full 23 years ago!

Speaking for common sense, West Virginia Senator Jay Rockefeller (Democrat) called for tougher regulations, saying this:

"Our legislature is in session, so the legislature should take action. But if they don't, then we have to get Congress all over it."

So, what did Republican House Speaker John Boehner have to say about new regulations in the wake of the spill? Just the following:

"The issue is this: We have enough regulations on the books. And what the administration ought to be doing is actually doing their jobs. Why wasn't this plant inspected since 1991? ... I am entirely confident that there are ample regulations already on the books to protect the health and safety of the American people. Somebody ought to be held accountable here. What we try to do is look at those regulations that we think are cumbersome, are over the top, and that are costing the economy jobs. That's where our focus continues to be."

In this quote, Boehner comes across as more ridiculous than a diabetic going on a Cinnabon diet. Allow me to recap what the House Speaker is essentially saying:

"West Virginia already has tons of regulations! The fact this plant was inspected 23 years ago should be proof enough! So, come on, we don't need more regulations! By the way, why wasn't this plant inspected since 1991? Someone should be held accountable for this! For having too many regulations and too few inspections! Regulations cost people jobs. That's what we have to focus on - not people's health. If people die, so be it. It's all about the jobs. And if we halt all these regulations, which forced this plant to be looked at 23 years ago, and continue with inspections, so that it gets looked at more, then we'll all be happy."

In other news, Boehner and his GOP brethren have bragged about cutting the Environmental Protection Agency's funding by 20% since 2010. It's quite the strategy - defund groups responsible for regulation and then point the finger elsewhere when that lack of regulation results in events such as the chemical spill in West Virginia. It'd be like following scenario:

Setting: A college classroom

Professor Mike Isa Dick: "Okay class... I'm about to hand you all your final exams. You'll have til the end of class to finish it. I will not allow anyone to continue taking it after class is over in two hours, so for any questions that go unanswered, they will be marked wrong. If you have any questions, I probably won't be able to answer them, but please, don't hesitate to ask. Best of luck!"

::he hands out the exams, before taking one away from a student::

Raymond Gurney: "May I have my test back please?"

Professor Dick: "No, sorry"

Raymond: "Why not?"

Professor Dick: "I feel I've handed out enough tests already. This should be good enough."

Raymond: "Wait... What?!?"

::after the teacher has graded the tests, he hands one back to Raymond::

Raymond: "A 0%? But you took my test away! That's not fair!"

Professor Dick: "Don't give me any of that! It's all your fault, mister!"

Raymond: "But I came to class on time, came prepared, and you took my test away from me before I even had a chance to look at it!"

Professor Dick: "Yeah, it sucks to be you, doesn't it?"


John Boehner to the people of West Virginia: "Yeah, it sucks to be you, doesn't it?"

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/01/14/john-boehner-chemical-spill_n_4595897.html

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Boycotting jukeboxes because of TouchTunes

I love music and enjoy hitting the bar(s) over the weekend, so naturally, when the mood strikes me, I've never been coy about playing some songs on the jukebox. This past Thursday, a friend of mine turned 50, so several friends of her's, including myself, all met up to celebrate the occasion. At around 9:30, a friend of mine and I both chipped in $5 to play some songs on the jukebox. Four hours and 231 skips later, we gave up on hearing the songs we had selected, and went home knowing we had just wasted $5. This wasn't the first time such a thing had happened to me (and many others), and due to that, I'll be boycotting jukeboxes. Why? The scam known as TouchTunes. You see, here's how the plot typically breaks down. A person (or group of people) downloads the TouchTunes app on his/her phone, consumes one too many adult beverages, and due to this, has less care for spending extra money to hear the songs of their choosing right NOW. That's the thing with TouchTun

The difference between "looking" and "checking out"

I may be way off with these numbers, but it's my approximation that at least 75% of individuals whom are involved in a serious relationship feel it's perfectly acceptable to "check out" members of the opposite sex they're not involved with. Meanwhile, approximately 25% either don't feel this is acceptable or aren't sure about the matter. I hadn't thought about this matter for a while, but since I've been dating a woman for about 8 months, the topic has been pondered about some. When reading or hearing others discuss this very issue, I often times hear comments similar to the following: "It's human nature to look." "There's nothing wrong with checking others out. I'm sure he/she does it too!" "It's fine to do it. Just don't tell your boyfriend/girlfriend about it or do it in front of them!" "It's natural to find people attractive." When observing the array of comments, I i

The verdict is in. To no one's surprise, Jonathan Hoenig has been found guilty of being an idiot.

Just recently, when discussing the Michael Brown shooting and whether or not race had anything to do with it, Fox News contributor Jonathan Hoenig said, "You know who talks about race? Racists." One moment while I provide Mr. Hoenig with the well deserved slow-clap. :: slow-claps for two seconds :: So, that was quite the line by Mr. Hoenig, wasn't it? "You know who talks about race? Racists." Well, wasn't he just talking about race? So, by his own words, I guess that makes him a racist. Also, if he wants to be consistent, does this mean that people whom talk about gender are sexists and people whom talk about sexual orientation are homophobes? With that line of thinking, Hoenig would engage in the following back-and-forths: Hoenig: "So, who are you voting for?" A woman: "The Democratic candidate, because he's been adamant about his support for equal rights for women." Hoenig: "You sexist feminist nazi!"