Skip to main content

Irony - The Bachelor style

Allow me to introduce to you the new star of the not-very-realistic reality television show The Bachelor. His name is Juan Pablo Galavis and is just the latest centerpiece of a show which depicts the art of sleeping around to find one true love as the best possible route. Yes, when I think about setting a good example for kids, the first thing that springs to mind is this very show. Speaking of which, Mr. Galavis was recently asked if featuring a gay bachelor on the show would be a good idea or not. His response was as follows:

"No... I respect [gay people] but, honestly, I don't think it's a good example for kids..."

No, of course not... But simultaneously dating and fooling around with ten different women is... Anyway, Mr. Galavis, you were saying?

"Obviously people have their husband and wife and kids and that is how we are brought up. Now there is fathers having kids and all that, and it is hard for me to understand that too in the sense of a household having peoples... Two parents sleeping in the same bed and the kid going into bed... It is confusing in a sense."

Yes, this quote of his is quite confusing, as it doesn't make a lot of sense. Fathers are having kids now? This is news to me. Does Mr. Galavis truly think that the Arnold Schwarzenegger film Junior was based off a true story? Anyway, Mr. Galavis, I have a feeling I cut you off again. Is there anything else you'd like to add?

"There's this thing about gay people... it seems to me, and I don't know if I'm mistaken or not... but they're more 'pervert' in a sense. And to me the show would be too strong... too hard to watch."

Very eloquently stated, Mr. Galavis... By the way, is your father George W. Bush by any chance? So, it's more "pervert" for a gay bachelor to simultaneously date and fool around with ten different guys to find his "true love" than it is for a heterosexual bachelor to simultaneously date and fool around with ten different women? How is that exactly? Speaking of hard to watch, given these less-than-poetic quotes, it'd be extremely difficult for me to watch Juan Pablo Galavis in the show this season.

In all honestly, I detest the show The Bachelor and wish it would finally come to its demise. However, while it's still airing, I have a difficult time understanding a star on the show decrying the possibility of a homosexual bachelor being given a chance in the future. It would have been one thing for Pope Francis to have made such a comment and quite another for a man simultaneously dating and fooling around with many different women, saying, "Hey, yo, a gay dude as the bachelor? That's just not right, man. That sends the wrong message to the kids. Oh, I gotta go. I gotta go out with these five chicks and see which one makes out the best. Wish me luck!"

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/01/18/juan-pablo-gay-bachelor_n_4622691.html

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Boycotting jukeboxes because of TouchTunes

I love music and enjoy hitting the bar(s) over the weekend, so naturally, when the mood strikes me, I've never been coy about playing some songs on the jukebox. This past Thursday, a friend of mine turned 50, so several friends of her's, including myself, all met up to celebrate the occasion. At around 9:30, a friend of mine and I both chipped in $5 to play some songs on the jukebox. Four hours and 231 skips later, we gave up on hearing the songs we had selected, and went home knowing we had just wasted $5. This wasn't the first time such a thing had happened to me (and many others), and due to that, I'll be boycotting jukeboxes. Why? The scam known as TouchTunes. You see, here's how the plot typically breaks down. A person (or group of people) downloads the TouchTunes app on his/her phone, consumes one too many adult beverages, and due to this, has less care for spending extra money to hear the songs of their choosing right NOW. That's the thing with TouchTun...

Mentioned on Crooks and Liars and Hinterland Gazette!

Due to some tweets of mine, I got mentioned on the following two sites (all my tweets can be viewed here -  https://twitter.com/CraigRozniecki ): https://crooksandliars.com/2019/04/trump-gives-stupid-advice-george https://hinterlandgazette.com/2019/03/istandwithschiff-is-trending-after-donald-trump-led-gop-attack-on-adam-schiff-backfires-spectacularly.html

Face guarding is legal in college football and the NFL

I just wanted to remind fans and announcers especially, that face guarding is legal in both college football and the NFL. It all comes down to contact. So long as a defender doesn't make contact with an intended receiver, he doesn't have to turn around to play the ball. I can't tell you how many times every week I hear announcers talk about face guarding being a penalty. It's not. I even heard one announcer yesterday state, "If the defender doesn't turn around and play the ball, the ref will call pass interference every time." That's simply not true. Courtesy of referee Bill LeMonnier, he says this with regard to the rule at the college level (answered on 8/12/13): "NCAA rules on pass interference require the face guarding to have contact to be a foul. No contact, no foul by NCAA rules." In the NFL rule book, this is written:  "Actions that constitute defensive pass interference include but are not limited to: (a) Contact by a ...