Skip to main content

Thanks to Facebook, I feel sorry for babies nowadays

I'm going to sound ancient here in a moment, but do you remember the good ol' days when our baby pictures were only shown off during the following occasions?

1. During family gatherings - Our parents would attempt to embarrass us with our childhood photo albums. Fortunately, most of the family had already seen these pictures, so our faces became increasingly desensitized to blushing with each and every such occasion.

2. High school gradation party - Not only were family members around to peruse the childhood pics, but add friends and even some teachers to that ever-growing list! Once again, the level of embarrassment typically didn't get out-of-hand since at such parties, the students are usually so busy welcoming and talking to people, they rarely have time to look through their photo albums with friends, family, or teachers. If a high school teacher, whom you had a crush on, was looking through such an album as you passed by, though, then that could be another story altogether. The student's cheeks may then put Rudolph's nose to shame.

3. Folks-meeting-the-girlfriend/boyfriend - It seems to be every mother's dream to one day show her son's/daughter's girlfriend/boyfriend their childhood photo album(s). Yes, this can be cause for embarrassment, especially if the feelings are strong. However, outside of some post-album teasing, the redness in the cheeks usually subsides within an hour or two.

Since I've yet to get married, these are really the only three such occasions when my photo albums have been shared with people, and I'm just fine with that. Anymore, though, I can't tell you how many such pictures I see on my Facebook newsfeed. I honestly can't remember the last day when I didn't see someone's baby or little kid shown to the Facebook world. These kids have absolutely no idea what their parents are doing. I can just imagine their reactions in 10-20 years when they become members of Facebook, start dating, going to college, etc. He or she will receive a comment on a picture their mother shared to her Facebook friends, which will say something along the lines of this: "Wow! Look at you! I can remember when I first saw you as a baby! I can't believe how big you've gotten!"

The child will then see the comment and engage in the following conversation with his/her mother:

Child: "Hey, mom? Who was that person commenting on my picture?"

Mother: "Oh, just a Facebook friend of mine, sweetie. We've never actually met. He's kind of a friend of a friend of a friend of a friend, really."

Child: "Wait - so you've never met him?"

Mother: "No, not that I know of - why?"

Child: "Well, then, how does he know what I looked like as a baby?"

Mother: "Because of all the pictures I posted of you on Facebook, of course."

Child: "So, there are hundreds of people who have seen my baby pictures where I'm completely naked and crying and stuff?"

Mother: "Yes, I suppose so. Actually, that number may be in the thousands, since I know many people re-shared the pictures I shared."

Child: "What? ...and you don't know a lot of these people?"

Mother: "I know maybe half of them, I'd say."

Child: "Oh my God, mom!"

Mother: "Is something wrong, my dear?"

Child: "Ugh!"


Yeah, remember those times when people were obsessed with camcorders? They'd tape their children doing everything except for sleeping and then attempt to show people these awful videos, which no one wanted to watch - especially their kids? This new Facebook-sharing-baby-photos obsession kind of reminds me of that. In fact, on some levels, it's gotten worse, because I've even heard of spats deriving from such posts.

New mother: "Whoa! I just posted three photos of my baby and she didn't like a single one of them! How dare her! I guess she isn't my bestie anymore!"

Yeah, that or she wasn't at the computer, didn't check her newsfeed, or something a bit more likely than just ignoring the photos completely.

This is one reason I don't particularly like Facebook sometimes. Why not spend more time showing our significant others and children we love them as opposed to trying to show others that we do?

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Boycotting jukeboxes because of TouchTunes

I love music and enjoy hitting the bar(s) over the weekend, so naturally, when the mood strikes me, I've never been coy about playing some songs on the jukebox. This past Thursday, a friend of mine turned 50, so several friends of her's, including myself, all met up to celebrate the occasion. At around 9:30, a friend of mine and I both chipped in $5 to play some songs on the jukebox. Four hours and 231 skips later, we gave up on hearing the songs we had selected, and went home knowing we had just wasted $5. This wasn't the first time such a thing had happened to me (and many others), and due to that, I'll be boycotting jukeboxes. Why? The scam known as TouchTunes. You see, here's how the plot typically breaks down. A person (or group of people) downloads the TouchTunes app on his/her phone, consumes one too many adult beverages, and due to this, has less care for spending extra money to hear the songs of their choosing right NOW. That's the thing with TouchTun

The difference between "looking" and "checking out"

I may be way off with these numbers, but it's my approximation that at least 75% of individuals whom are involved in a serious relationship feel it's perfectly acceptable to "check out" members of the opposite sex they're not involved with. Meanwhile, approximately 25% either don't feel this is acceptable or aren't sure about the matter. I hadn't thought about this matter for a while, but since I've been dating a woman for about 8 months, the topic has been pondered about some. When reading or hearing others discuss this very issue, I often times hear comments similar to the following: "It's human nature to look." "There's nothing wrong with checking others out. I'm sure he/she does it too!" "It's fine to do it. Just don't tell your boyfriend/girlfriend about it or do it in front of them!" "It's natural to find people attractive." When observing the array of comments, I i

The verdict is in. To no one's surprise, Jonathan Hoenig has been found guilty of being an idiot.

Just recently, when discussing the Michael Brown shooting and whether or not race had anything to do with it, Fox News contributor Jonathan Hoenig said, "You know who talks about race? Racists." One moment while I provide Mr. Hoenig with the well deserved slow-clap. :: slow-claps for two seconds :: So, that was quite the line by Mr. Hoenig, wasn't it? "You know who talks about race? Racists." Well, wasn't he just talking about race? So, by his own words, I guess that makes him a racist. Also, if he wants to be consistent, does this mean that people whom talk about gender are sexists and people whom talk about sexual orientation are homophobes? With that line of thinking, Hoenig would engage in the following back-and-forths: Hoenig: "So, who are you voting for?" A woman: "The Democratic candidate, because he's been adamant about his support for equal rights for women." Hoenig: "You sexist feminist nazi!"