Skip to main content

The pen is mightier than the sword and the stick is mightier than the gun in Virginia

In the state of Virginia, it's prohibited for visitors to bring American flags and signs attached to sticks to the state legislature, because sticks can be used as weapons. Guns, meanwhile, can be carried into Virginia's state legislature, because, well, you've all heard the phrase, right? "Guns don't kill people; American flags on sticks do."

Members of the group Moms Demand Action for Gun Sense in America found this out on Martin Luther King Day this past Monday, when they attempted to walk inside the state capitol, but were told they couldn't bring anything attached to the deadliest weapon known to man - a stick.

Meanwhile, members of the gun rights group Virginia Citizens Defense League (and other like groups) organized a "Guns Save Lives" day on that same day and had no problem entering the capitol with anything from handguns to assault rifles, because guns are obviously as harmless as a dead fly.

With regard to the odd series of events, MDA (Moms Demand Action) member Gena Reeder had this to say:

"We are sending a message that you cannot hand carry an American flag into a state capitol, but you can bring a loaded weapon. Are guns becoming more patriotic than an American flag?"

Evidently... As a matter of fact, I'd like for us to all stand up, remove our caps, and place our right hand over our heart, and just repeat after me.

I pledge allegiance to the guns of the United States of America, and to the loony bin for which it stands, one nation under hypnosis, quite divisible, with insanity and Clozapine for all.

Alright, you can all sit back down now if you'd like. Well, I hate to cut this short, but I've been invited to take part in an old western fast draw. While my opponent will just be armed with a gun, I'll be carrying around my always reliable stick. Given Virginia's logic, I'm thinking the Vegas odds will definitely be in my favor. Wish my luck!

http://thinkprogress.org/justice/2014/01/24/3198821/state-capitols-guns-flags/

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Boycotting jukeboxes because of TouchTunes

I love music and enjoy hitting the bar(s) over the weekend, so naturally, when the mood strikes me, I've never been coy about playing some songs on the jukebox. This past Thursday, a friend of mine turned 50, so several friends of her's, including myself, all met up to celebrate the occasion. At around 9:30, a friend of mine and I both chipped in $5 to play some songs on the jukebox. Four hours and 231 skips later, we gave up on hearing the songs we had selected, and went home knowing we had just wasted $5. This wasn't the first time such a thing had happened to me (and many others), and due to that, I'll be boycotting jukeboxes. Why? The scam known as TouchTunes. You see, here's how the plot typically breaks down. A person (or group of people) downloads the TouchTunes app on his/her phone, consumes one too many adult beverages, and due to this, has less care for spending extra money to hear the songs of their choosing right NOW. That's the thing with TouchTun

The difference between "looking" and "checking out"

I may be way off with these numbers, but it's my approximation that at least 75% of individuals whom are involved in a serious relationship feel it's perfectly acceptable to "check out" members of the opposite sex they're not involved with. Meanwhile, approximately 25% either don't feel this is acceptable or aren't sure about the matter. I hadn't thought about this matter for a while, but since I've been dating a woman for about 8 months, the topic has been pondered about some. When reading or hearing others discuss this very issue, I often times hear comments similar to the following: "It's human nature to look." "There's nothing wrong with checking others out. I'm sure he/she does it too!" "It's fine to do it. Just don't tell your boyfriend/girlfriend about it or do it in front of them!" "It's natural to find people attractive." When observing the array of comments, I i

The verdict is in. To no one's surprise, Jonathan Hoenig has been found guilty of being an idiot.

Just recently, when discussing the Michael Brown shooting and whether or not race had anything to do with it, Fox News contributor Jonathan Hoenig said, "You know who talks about race? Racists." One moment while I provide Mr. Hoenig with the well deserved slow-clap. :: slow-claps for two seconds :: So, that was quite the line by Mr. Hoenig, wasn't it? "You know who talks about race? Racists." Well, wasn't he just talking about race? So, by his own words, I guess that makes him a racist. Also, if he wants to be consistent, does this mean that people whom talk about gender are sexists and people whom talk about sexual orientation are homophobes? With that line of thinking, Hoenig would engage in the following back-and-forths: Hoenig: "So, who are you voting for?" A woman: "The Democratic candidate, because he's been adamant about his support for equal rights for women." Hoenig: "You sexist feminist nazi!"