Skip to main content

Want to read dumb conversations? Check out ESPN.com...

There are times I'll skim through comments posted below articles. Once in a while, they'll contain decent, civilized discussions. However, such conversations seem to typically be with regard to the touchy topics of politics and religion. When it comes to sports, it's less likely to come across one of these talks than it is to discover a winning lottery ticket while drunk at a bar called "Gettin' U Sh*tfaced."

While I'm a definite sports lover, I am not obsessed with any one team or player. I watch sports because I enjoy the passion, physicality, competition, and most of all, strategy and execution. I often times view sports like I would movies. The ones I enjoy the most have a good flow to them, possess an interesting plot, and leave me out of breath after an exhilarating climax. Even then, though, I often times have to roll my eyes at ESPN and the like, because like most cable news channels anymore, ESPN comes across more as a hybrid of a sports channel and TMZ than a pure sports/news network. While it's perfectly fine to report on injuries, trades, arrests, and other news-related stories, more and more, I'm reading headlines where I have to double-check to make sure I'm signed into ESPN.com and not NationalEnquirer.com or TheOnion.com.

Just today, I read an article about how Miami Heat superstar LeBron James is "jealous" of Oklahoma City front-man Kevin Durant. Why? Because Durant typically has more shot attempts than James. Of course, from the headline, no one could be sure just the reason for which James was supposedly jealous of Durant. While I rolled my eyes at the headline, curiosity got the best of me and I had to roll my eyes even further when reading the actual story.

I then decided to skim through some comments below the article and found more typos in the first handful of comments than I had seen in the previous week combined. I also read more insults thrown between parties than I had heard on Fox News for the previous couple of weeks. How I wish these people would be more passionate about real world problems than about guys shooting a ball through a hoop.

Here's just a taste of how these lovely conversations go:

Person #1: "Another outstanding non sports worthy article about Lebron. You ESPN never cease to amaze me!!! Great job!!!!"

Person #2: "Y do u feel the need to post about it? Go to another site if ur unhappy"

Person #3: "You bash ESPN. What the hell do you think ESPN stands for? You sir are a moron. And if you don't like what you see then keep scrolling you troll. Go read something that is above your standards ya douche"

Person #4: "and he is a complete whiny, flopping betch that plays without something Jordan, Jeter, Tebow have- integrity."

Person #5: "youre a moron if you think Jordan and Jeter are saints"

...and so it goes... Feeling down and want to feel a bit better about yourself? Then I'd suggest either watching The Jerry Springer Show or reading through comments on ESPN.com. Within three minutes, you'll think, "Wow! I guess I really am pretty smart! Life isn't so bad after all! Ah, I feel a headache coming due to these idiots. Should I take some Advil or get a drink? Decisions, decisions..."

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Boycotting jukeboxes because of TouchTunes

I love music and enjoy hitting the bar(s) over the weekend, so naturally, when the mood strikes me, I've never been coy about playing some songs on the jukebox. This past Thursday, a friend of mine turned 50, so several friends of her's, including myself, all met up to celebrate the occasion. At around 9:30, a friend of mine and I both chipped in $5 to play some songs on the jukebox. Four hours and 231 skips later, we gave up on hearing the songs we had selected, and went home knowing we had just wasted $5. This wasn't the first time such a thing had happened to me (and many others), and due to that, I'll be boycotting jukeboxes. Why? The scam known as TouchTunes. You see, here's how the plot typically breaks down. A person (or group of people) downloads the TouchTunes app on his/her phone, consumes one too many adult beverages, and due to this, has less care for spending extra money to hear the songs of their choosing right NOW. That's the thing with TouchTun

The difference between "looking" and "checking out"

I may be way off with these numbers, but it's my approximation that at least 75% of individuals whom are involved in a serious relationship feel it's perfectly acceptable to "check out" members of the opposite sex they're not involved with. Meanwhile, approximately 25% either don't feel this is acceptable or aren't sure about the matter. I hadn't thought about this matter for a while, but since I've been dating a woman for about 8 months, the topic has been pondered about some. When reading or hearing others discuss this very issue, I often times hear comments similar to the following: "It's human nature to look." "There's nothing wrong with checking others out. I'm sure he/she does it too!" "It's fine to do it. Just don't tell your boyfriend/girlfriend about it or do it in front of them!" "It's natural to find people attractive." When observing the array of comments, I i

The verdict is in. To no one's surprise, Jonathan Hoenig has been found guilty of being an idiot.

Just recently, when discussing the Michael Brown shooting and whether or not race had anything to do with it, Fox News contributor Jonathan Hoenig said, "You know who talks about race? Racists." One moment while I provide Mr. Hoenig with the well deserved slow-clap. :: slow-claps for two seconds :: So, that was quite the line by Mr. Hoenig, wasn't it? "You know who talks about race? Racists." Well, wasn't he just talking about race? So, by his own words, I guess that makes him a racist. Also, if he wants to be consistent, does this mean that people whom talk about gender are sexists and people whom talk about sexual orientation are homophobes? With that line of thinking, Hoenig would engage in the following back-and-forths: Hoenig: "So, who are you voting for?" A woman: "The Democratic candidate, because he's been adamant about his support for equal rights for women." Hoenig: "You sexist feminist nazi!"