Skip to main content

Super Bowl Prediction

Sunday, February 2nd

Game: Seattle vs. Denver

Pick: Denver - This is a football lover's dream match-up right here, as it pairs off the league's best offense (Denver) with the league's best defense (Seattle). While I typically favor a great defense against a great offense, these great offenses don't typically have Peyton Manning, who, in his record-shattering season, appears to be on a mission for his second Super Bowl ring. Giving him an extra week of watching film is almost unfair for the Seahawks defense, who, in spite of their great season, haven't faced an offense nearly the caliber of Denver. I also liked how Denver's defense stepped up against Tom Brady and the New England Patriots on Sunday. The Seattle Seahawks were again unspectacular on offense, but just good enough to eek out a win against the San Francisco 49ers. Taking all these things into consideration, for the time being, I'm going to go with the Denver Broncos in a 27-24 win over the Seattle Seahawks. I say "for the time being," because if the game-time forecast in New York is scheduled to be extremely cold and snowy, I think this gives an advantage to the Seahawks. They tend to run the ball far more efficiently than the Broncos and their run defense is typically superior to Denver's as well. But, until I hear that the forecast is going to be lousy come game-time, I'll take the Broncos by a field goal.

Result:

Record:

Overall Playoff Record: 6-4 (.600)

Regular Season Record: 163-92-1 (.639)

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Boycotting jukeboxes because of TouchTunes

I love music and enjoy hitting the bar(s) over the weekend, so naturally, when the mood strikes me, I've never been coy about playing some songs on the jukebox. This past Thursday, a friend of mine turned 50, so several friends of her's, including myself, all met up to celebrate the occasion. At around 9:30, a friend of mine and I both chipped in $5 to play some songs on the jukebox. Four hours and 231 skips later, we gave up on hearing the songs we had selected, and went home knowing we had just wasted $5. This wasn't the first time such a thing had happened to me (and many others), and due to that, I'll be boycotting jukeboxes. Why? The scam known as TouchTunes. You see, here's how the plot typically breaks down. A person (or group of people) downloads the TouchTunes app on his/her phone, consumes one too many adult beverages, and due to this, has less care for spending extra money to hear the songs of their choosing right NOW. That's the thing with TouchTun...

Mentioned on Crooks and Liars and Hinterland Gazette!

Due to some tweets of mine, I got mentioned on the following two sites (all my tweets can be viewed here -  https://twitter.com/CraigRozniecki ): https://crooksandliars.com/2019/04/trump-gives-stupid-advice-george https://hinterlandgazette.com/2019/03/istandwithschiff-is-trending-after-donald-trump-led-gop-attack-on-adam-schiff-backfires-spectacularly.html

Face guarding is legal in college football and the NFL

I just wanted to remind fans and announcers especially, that face guarding is legal in both college football and the NFL. It all comes down to contact. So long as a defender doesn't make contact with an intended receiver, he doesn't have to turn around to play the ball. I can't tell you how many times every week I hear announcers talk about face guarding being a penalty. It's not. I even heard one announcer yesterday state, "If the defender doesn't turn around and play the ball, the ref will call pass interference every time." That's simply not true. Courtesy of referee Bill LeMonnier, he says this with regard to the rule at the college level (answered on 8/12/13): "NCAA rules on pass interference require the face guarding to have contact to be a foul. No contact, no foul by NCAA rules." In the NFL rule book, this is written:  "Actions that constitute defensive pass interference include but are not limited to: (a) Contact by a ...