Skip to main content

New Mexico Representative Steve Pearce continues to help the GOP attract women voters

Remember how, after the 2012 elections, the Republican Party talked about re-branding themselves of being more tolerant? Of trying to attract more voters, such as women and minorities? How's that going? Some words of advice for the GOP - it doesn't help to just say you're going to re-brand if you don't actually follow through with it. It's not going to help a marriage if an alcoholic husband says he's going to clean up his act, all the while he's doing shots of vodka.

Since the GOP started their re-branding efforts, they've continued to attract women voters by attempting to: Take away their reproductive rights, take away their contraceptive rights, make it more difficult to vote, and fight against equal pay for equal work. Yes, they're that smooth. New Mexico Representative Steve Pearce recently continued this lovely trend for his party.

In Pearce's new memoir, he wrote the following:

"The husband's part is to show up during the times of deep stress, take the leadership role and be accountable for the outcome, blaming no one else. The wife's submission is not a matter of superior versus inferior; rather, it is self-imposed as a matter of obedience to the Lord and of love for her husband."

That's bound to go over well with women voters, especially after I translate what Pearce really meant with his quote:

"I love women. As a matter of fact, the whole Republican Party loves women. We have been unfairly branded as the anti-woman party, but that's simply not true. We're the God party. We get our instructions from the Bible, and as I stand here looking at a teleprompter, what was true 3,000 years ago should still be true today. Our rankings according to this ancient book are: 1) God, 2) the husband, 3) the kids, 4) the pet, and 5) the maid/wife. This isn't about superiority or inferiority. It's just God's law - 3,500 years ago. It's a husband's job to be responsible, dominant, and macho, and it's the wife's job to always say yes to the man. So, ladies, I'm here to be the first to show off the GOPs new anti-drug, pro-women slogan. Here it is... 'Just say no to drugs, just say yes to your husbands.' Thank you! God bless you, and God bless slave women, I mean, the United States of America!"

http://thinkprogress.org/justice/2014/01/23/3193811/gop-congressman-wife-voluntarily-submit/

Comments

  1. I missed this on Think Progress and thank goodness because it ultimately brought me to your site! It is smart, sassy and factual -- all the things I like and my colleague and I work to include on elect2care.com. Thanks so much for signing up for my Twitter account associated with it. I've just added you, and will get to your Facebook and other accounts as well. We've got to scream these messages from the rooftops until people start to get it!

    Jan
    www.elect2care.com

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hey Jan,

      Thanks a bunch for your kind comments and for following me on here and Twitter. I've started following your site/blog as well, and also liked your Facebook page.

      Yeah, between this comment and Mike Hucakbee's yesterday with regard to women not being able to control their libido, the far-right has been on a roll this week with the fairer sex. Just last week, another such individual (Ken Buck - Colorado) compared pregnancy to cancer. Like what's written in my Twitter profile, I seriously believe a Long Island Iced Tea party is more sane than the Tea Party.

      Anyway, thanks again and keep it up with the facts! To the far-right, that's like Kryptonite!

      Delete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Boycotting jukeboxes because of TouchTunes

I love music and enjoy hitting the bar(s) over the weekend, so naturally, when the mood strikes me, I've never been coy about playing some songs on the jukebox. This past Thursday, a friend of mine turned 50, so several friends of her's, including myself, all met up to celebrate the occasion. At around 9:30, a friend of mine and I both chipped in $5 to play some songs on the jukebox. Four hours and 231 skips later, we gave up on hearing the songs we had selected, and went home knowing we had just wasted $5. This wasn't the first time such a thing had happened to me (and many others), and due to that, I'll be boycotting jukeboxes. Why? The scam known as TouchTunes. You see, here's how the plot typically breaks down. A person (or group of people) downloads the TouchTunes app on his/her phone, consumes one too many adult beverages, and due to this, has less care for spending extra money to hear the songs of their choosing right NOW. That's the thing with TouchTun

The difference between "looking" and "checking out"

I may be way off with these numbers, but it's my approximation that at least 75% of individuals whom are involved in a serious relationship feel it's perfectly acceptable to "check out" members of the opposite sex they're not involved with. Meanwhile, approximately 25% either don't feel this is acceptable or aren't sure about the matter. I hadn't thought about this matter for a while, but since I've been dating a woman for about 8 months, the topic has been pondered about some. When reading or hearing others discuss this very issue, I often times hear comments similar to the following: "It's human nature to look." "There's nothing wrong with checking others out. I'm sure he/she does it too!" "It's fine to do it. Just don't tell your boyfriend/girlfriend about it or do it in front of them!" "It's natural to find people attractive." When observing the array of comments, I i

The verdict is in. To no one's surprise, Jonathan Hoenig has been found guilty of being an idiot.

Just recently, when discussing the Michael Brown shooting and whether or not race had anything to do with it, Fox News contributor Jonathan Hoenig said, "You know who talks about race? Racists." One moment while I provide Mr. Hoenig with the well deserved slow-clap. :: slow-claps for two seconds :: So, that was quite the line by Mr. Hoenig, wasn't it? "You know who talks about race? Racists." Well, wasn't he just talking about race? So, by his own words, I guess that makes him a racist. Also, if he wants to be consistent, does this mean that people whom talk about gender are sexists and people whom talk about sexual orientation are homophobes? With that line of thinking, Hoenig would engage in the following back-and-forths: Hoenig: "So, who are you voting for?" A woman: "The Democratic candidate, because he's been adamant about his support for equal rights for women." Hoenig: "You sexist feminist nazi!"